Mark Rathbun: Wright alleges that “by October (2009) Rathbun got hold of the letter (Paul Haggis’ Scientology resignation letter). Actually, I have an email dated 23 August where I am already talking to Haggis, not only do I have the letter I am giving Haggis detailed, meticulous instructions about how to present it deceptively to media contacts that I have established – this is two months prior to October. It didn’t as Wright states “find its way” to me; Paul Haggis sent it to me directly by email. Paul Haggis consulted with me every step of the way, how he should position this and how he should do this. Quote from Going Clear: “He (Rathbun) called Haggis who was shooting (film) in Pittsburgh and asked if he could publish the letter on his blog.” In fact, two months earlier than that Paul Haggis wrote to me (Rathbun) and made me the coordinating point on seeing to it that his letter was published. So, how could I be asking him to publish it two months later? I coached Haggis through every step of the way on the release of his letter. What a prima donna. This process went on for two months. (This was part of the phony narrative making Haggis look like he was operating on his own initiative, the John Wayne narrative. It was invented.)
Posted onJune 17, 2017|Comments Off on Going Clear, Part 16 – More Paul Haggis Inventions
Going Clear, Part 16 transcript:
Mark Rathbun: At page 319 Wright goes back to his narrative on Paul Haggis. Wright writes “Haggis was casting the movie The Next Three Days in the summer of 2009 and he asked Jason Beghe to read a part for his detective.”Wright writes about Haggis connecting back up with Jason Beghe. This is like a film script from Haggis. Quote: “‘I just want you to know I am no longer in Scientology,’ Beghe told Haggis when called. ‘Actually, I am one of its most outspoken critics; the church would be very unhappy if you hire me.” The whole thing sounds dramatic and daring on Haggis’ part. In reality, the matter was quite mundane. Wright omits that the reason Paul Haggis called Jason Beghe is because I already told Haggis that Jason was out of the church. I also asked Haggis to do ME (Mark Rathbun) a favor and find some work for Beghe who was nearing need of psychiatric care for anxiety of his long spell of no work in Hollywood. He was a wreck. His confidence was shot. That is all omitted. So the invent a ‘cold call’ by Paul Haggis to Beghe. They make Paul look like strong me like “hey, when I decide to cast somebody, I cast somebody.” Wright makes Haggis out to be John Wayne. Wright makes it look like Haggis is learning for the first time Jason is out of the church when he calls to cast him. Which is bullshit, because the only reason he is calling is because I already told him he was out of the church. I gave Haggis Jason Beghe’s entire history. I had Haggis watch all of Beghe’s antiScientology videos on Youtube – all before Haggis ever called Beghe, or even had the idea to call Beghe. It is like they (Wright and Haggis) are living a Hollywood fantasy. They make Haggis look some sort of macho guy. I mean, Haggis spoke to me for DAYS before he would make the Beghe call I asked him to make. This is all invention.
Mark Rathbun: This is where we show the underlying phony narrative going on with Wright’s book. Quote from “Going Clear”: “Because (Paul) Haggis stopped complained (Tommy) Davis felt the issue had been laid to rest. But, far from putting the matter Haggis began an investigation into the church. His inquiry, much of it conducted online, echoed the actions of the lead character he was writing for Russell Crowe in the Next Three Days ”, who goes on the internet to research a way to break his wife out.” This is such patent patronizing using his own created character to him (Haggis) look like a hero in a movie. The reason I earlier covered all this business on the subject of homosexuality (that was busting the myth that Scientology was ever even as homophobic as the American Psychological Association, much less any other religion in America) is there is all this emphasis on Paul Haggis so suddenly shocked that Scientology didn’t necessarily promote homosexuality (as his reason for becoming “disillusioned” with the church); It is false, this is false. First, he did not begin an investigation of Scientology after an alleged tiff with a church representative over Proposition 8 (Gay marriage initiative). To the contrary, Haggis sat on his butt. Write writes “what is so striking about Haggis’ investigation is that few prominent figures attached to the church have looked into the charges that have surrounded their institution for many years.” Again, Wright is going to lionize and dramatize this alleged altruistic nature that sets Paul Haggis apart from the rest of these scum Scientology celebrities who won’t look. Again, I am telling you Haggis did not do that. This is false. What actually happened was that a year after this intro (about Haggis’s alleged shock the Church did not lobby in favor of Proposition 8) that Wright created, I received a mailing list that had Paul Haggis’ email address on it. I initiated with him an initially anonymous email communication, directing his attention to media that I had participated in. I did it very cleverly to draw his interest to get him talking about it before he even knew who I was. This cat and mouse game went on for several days. He read the media I directed him to and only THEN did he begin to investigate (it has ZERO to do with any issue every remoted related to the created story about his alleged outrage about Scientology’s position concerning homosexuality).
To give Larry Wright a break. After his initial Scientology story about Haggis in New Yorker (the predicate for his later book Going Clear), Paul Haggis phoned me and he said “Marty could you do me a big, big, big favor?” Because, of course he knew Larry Wright had chosen me to be the sort of surrogate for the Church (since the Church had no interest in dealing with him) – just so his due diligence would be done. So, Paul knew that I was a huge part of the Wright created Haggis/Scientology narrative. Haggis said to me, “look, for the sake of my image with my daughters, can you please avoid telling Larry Wright that it was you who prompted me to go do an investigation into the church?” I told him, “look man, I am not going to lie to Wright but I will deceive him by not originating it. Unless he specifically asks me point on, I will bob and weave, but I am telling you if I get asked straight up, I am not going to outright lie for.” Oh, Paul was profusely thanking me because it was very important for his image with his kids. Now, in retrospect, now that I have seen the whole Going Clear campaign and movie have rolled out, I am pretty sure that he couldn’t give a rat’s about his kids. Instead, it is important for his own public image because he rode this sort of rode this pro gay rights wave as a PR vehicle and to paint himself as heroic. This entire passage by Wright is critical to Haggis’ entire narrative and that is why he has got to pump it up, “What is so striking about Haggis’ investigation is that NO prominent Scientologist has ever charted and trailblazed the land that he decided unilaterally to go blaze.” The problem is, he didn’t. It didn’t happen.
Posted onJune 16, 2017|Comments Off on Going Clear, Part 14 Vexatious Litigants Lionized
Going Clear, Part 14 transcript:
Mark Rathbun: So then Wright goes into this guy Michael Pattinson. He’s a guy who claimed to be gay and discriminated against by Scientology. And he brought a lawsuit about it against the church and John Travolta…and I think me, and I think David Miscavige. I mean it was one of those nutcase lawsuits where he listed Bill Clinton who was the sitting president of the United States of America at the time of this lawsuit. Larry Wright doesn’t tell you that in his book. More like, “this is a very grave, important lawsuit on the issue of homosexuality that Michael Pattinson brought.” Wright writes “that case was voluntarily withdrawn after an avalanche of countersuits. Both Pattinson and his attorneys say they were driven into bankruptcy.” I was there when that lawsuit got filed and you know what it was good for? Comedic relief. And that is how the court viewed it. It was a complete shopping cart lady lawsuit. Yet, Wright makes it sound like legitimate thing here and that these people were somehow systematically destroyed for having the temerity to raise these “grave issues.” And the lawyer who filed the suit, one Graham Berry, was adjudicated by the Superior Court in Los Angeles to be a ’vexatious litigant.’ That meant Berry was required to have his pleadings read and vetted by the court before he could even lodge a new lawsuit. This case was so frivolous that the attorney who filed it lost his right to bring another lawsuit without prior judicial authorization. Wright did not share these inconvenient facts.
Posted onJune 15, 2017|Comments Off on Going Clear, Part 13 Lawrence Wright’s actual malice re IRS
Going Clear, Part 13 summary:
Rathbun details the two years of ‘living hell’ the IRS put the Church of Scientology through before deciding there was no remaining grounds by which they could deny it tax exemption. The IRS thoroughly examined every entity even marginally related to the church, including examining ten years of Founder L. Ron Hubbard’s taxes long after his death, including settlement of his estate. It was only after the IRS exhausted every lead through all of the books and activities of every entity that they concluded, “Ok, they’re all exempt.” It wasn’t that the church asked for or demanded every entity receive exemption; it was that the IRS insisted upon examining them. Wright was informed of all this. Not only did he not report it, he wondered aloud in his book how it was that the IRS ‘caved’ to the church’s alleged demand for across the board exemptions. Per Rathbun, Wright “never let the facts get in the way of his narrative.” Wright asserts it was odd the IRS granted exemption when the “courts had repeatedly ruled in its favor” against Scientology. In fact, Rathbun shared dozens of more then-recent decisions the church had been racking up against the IRS, decisions that put the IRS in an legally untenable position should it not afford Scientology a full consideration for exemption for the many years which had yet to be adjudicated. Rathbun details some of those decisions. None of it was mentioned in Wright’s book to maintain the fiction there was something untoward about the IRS’s 1993 tax exemption recognition of Scientology churches. Clearly, Wright was setting up an “authoritative” book to use for the purpose of attempting to have Scientology’s tax exemption removed. That later proved to be the case when Wright, his film Director Alex Gibney, and paid witness Mike Rinder strenuously campaigned to have exactly that done – on the basis of the book Going Clear and its movie adaptation. “I went through all of this with Wright, all of it, for many hours, including many follow up phone calls.” None of it made it in the book.
Posted onJune 15, 2017|Comments Off on Going Clear, Part 12 – IRS and religion invention
Going Clear, Part 12 summary
Wright invents the ‘fact’ that the IRS in 1992 settlement negotiations was making a determination of whether or not Scientology was a religion, a task he adjudicates the IRS was ‘ill-equipped’ to do. Rathbun, recounts how he had explicitly, long prior to publication, demonstrated to Wright that his was not only not the case, but could not be the case. Scientology had won that determination in court in 1967, after years of the IRS attempting to challenge it. Since then, Rathbun told Wright, dozens of courts had reconfirmed that finding. It was such settled law that even the IRS wanted to make such an adjudication in 1992 they were powerless to do so. Yet, Wright alleges the “unqualified” IRS set out to do so in 1982.
Posted onJune 14, 2017|Comments Off on Going Clear, Part 11- IRS, fraudulent deceptions
Going Clear, Part 11 summary
Wrights weaves an invention-laden narrative that is false in sum and substance about Scientology’s history vis a vis the Internal Revenue service. Wright literally invents the origin of the problem with the IRS – an event that Rathbun demonstrates never occurred and could not have occurred. Wright lies about the Church’s alleged IRS liabilities. Based on these two inventions Wright dramatically concludes “The Founder had placed Scientology’s head on the executioner’s block.” Rathbun notes, “he literally invented two statements and then from them invented a conclusion.” Wright was informed that his misinformation that the church investigated the private lives of IRS agents was false, yet he published it anyway – with no source. His only source said it didn’t happen and he published it anyway. Rathbun details a dozen facts that Wright was informed were incorrect, yet Wright published anyway.
Posted onJune 14, 2017|Comments Off on Going Clear, Part 10 – Cult Awareness Network
Going Clear, Part 10 summary
Cult Awareness Network. Wright laments Cult Awareness Network being sued by individual Scientologists. But, he intentionally omits the substance of those suits. “The substance of it was that the Cult Awareness Network was being used literally as an arm of the Internal Revenue Service to investigate Scientology and Scientologists.” Cult Awareness Network (CAN) was serving as a propaganda arm for the IRS. And they were doing all this while enjoying tax exemption. But, by law they were required to present both sides of issues, in order to qualify as an exempt educational organization. The lawsuits were brought after Cult Awareness Network denied Scientologists membership in order to provide the other side of the Scientology story. “Not only would it refused to be balanced, they wouldn’t even let somebody participate who would provide the balance.” The lawsuits were meritorious under civil rights principles which CAN refused to abide. So, Wright forwards his propaganda by falsely promoting an anti-Scientology propaganda organization.
Posted onJune 13, 2017|Comments Off on Going Clear, Part 9 – 9 Lies in one Paragraph
Going Clear, Part 9: Wollersheim case, Nine scandalous lies in one paragraph.
Rathbun dissects 7 sentences in one paragraph that he demonstrates contains 9 lies. These concern events that Rathbun would have been a first-hand witness to had they occurred. He exposes a number of other inventions of Wright himself where he cites no witnesses or ones who have been thoroughly discredited. Had Wright checked any one of these charges with Rathbun – all concerned times and places Rathbun had direct knowledge of – Wright would have had his facts corrected. Not that it he would have. He knew Rathbun was the most credible witness and was present at the times and places recounted, yet never gave him the opportunity to corroborate or deny any of them. Wright even accuses the church of doing things that are physically impossible in this universe.
Posted onJune 13, 2017|Comments Off on Going Clear, Part 8 Questionable Sources
Going Clear, Part 8: Questionable Sources
Wright indicts and convicts L. Ron Hubbard and David Miscavige at the ages of 12 years old. Literally, Wright goes back that far to invent episodes in their lives to attack their characters. In the case of Miscavige, Wright spent 4 pages utilizing a source lacking credibility to accuse Miscavige of something that allegedly occurred 40 years earlier, making Miscavige 12 years old. Rathbun provides first-hand information that demonstrates the witness to lack credibility. Write takes innuendo, muses about, turning it into fact during the process.