Is Corporate Media Dead?

Posted on November 13, 2024 by | Comments Off on Is Corporate Media Dead?

If you relied solely upon corporate media for your information, you would most likely be shocked and terrified to the core by last week’s election result.  After all, you would have been plied for many months with hoax after hoax claiming Trump is Hitler literally and Harris is Joy literally.  You would have bought into the narrative that Harris leads a ‘razor close’ race. You would have ‘known’ that if somehow Trump squeaked out a win, he would handily lose the popular vote, justifying all manner of quasi-legal and illegal resistance to his administration. Like the J 6 committee persecutor Jamie Raskin’s decertification promise, Raskin Revolt.  You think that punk has got the balls to try that stunt now?

So, what does a landslide popular vote mandate for Trump tell you about what the media has been telling you for the past eight years? I guarantee you this: if you have a sliver of a conscience and a hair of intellectual honesty your learning will be at PHD levels compared to the corporate media.

One of the most amazing facts of the past eight years has been corporate media’s (including its left leaning government sponsors) complete lack of self-inspection. A very well researched book by one of America’s premiere investigative journalists released in early 2017 graphically demonstrated the need for such reflection (See, Enemy of the People) Matt Taibbi, the author of Insane Ass Clown President, was known then as a left-leaning muckracker. Taibbi ably demonstrated that Trump won in 2016 primarily because he unapologetically declared corporate media as the enemy of the people because of its unswerving allegiance to preserving the American autocracy and attacking any dissent like a pack of starving wolves. Seven years have passed and Taibbi’s hoped-for media self-examination (despite much nudging by Taibbi himself) never came. Instead of examining what the losers and the media got wrong in 2016, they stepped up the demonization of their perceived enemies and idealization of their own losing political agenda. 

Corporate media became so censorship/propaganda directed during the 2016-2024 election cycles that an increasing public thirst for facts and truth led to the rise of a grassroots online citizen media.  By 2024 that alternative media far eclipsed corporate media’s reach. For example, former Fox host Tucker Carlson (fired for his increasingly populist oriented shows) opened shop online and soon was netting over 50 million viewers for premiere interviews – some reaching super bowl-like figures – numbers the networks are lucky to get even for a presidential debate.  Joe Rogan regularly attracts tens of millions of listeners to his interviews.  CNN by comparison is lucky to hit ½ a million in any given evening prime time. 

Libertarian political commentator Dave Smith recently summed up the feelings of regular Americans toward corporate media on the Joe Rogan Experience.

After the election, conservative pundit Matt Walsh declared: “Legacy media is officially dead. Their ability to set the narrative has been destroyed. Trump declared war on the media in 2016. Tonight he vanquished them completely. They will never be relevant again.”

Is Walsh right? If the media were capable of the self-examination and correction that Matt Taibbi encouraged seven years ago, perhaps Walsh overestimates.

Scott Jennings, the one counterbalancing conservative voice at CNN, put the question to the beast directly to its face:

On the immediate heels of the election there was but one indication I could find, and I looked, that the corporate media might have learned a lesson. Here is a violently anti-Trump propagandist having a three-minute Freudian slip of sorts:

But Joe couldn’t even make it through the same show without reverting to the race-bait grift, now blaming the alleged “misogyny” of Black and Latino men for the Democrat party woes:

Think about that one for a second. America’s number one race-baiting grifter Al Sharpton calling Black and Latino men misogynist by their very nature. It doesn’t get any more patently racist than that. And, yet the cognitive dissonance factory keeps on spewing its intellectually toxic waste. 

Looking inward was by far the exception and not the rule for the corporate media.

Upon declaring Trump the winner of the 2024 election the New York Times immediately regressed to chaos and terror peddling to its now confirmed minority following.

The Times gravely announced “AMERICA HIRES A STRONGMAN: This was the conquering of the nation not by force but by permission.  Now, America stands on the precipice of an authoritarian style or governance never before seen in its 248-year history.”

The Times then recorded its “top” opinion columnists to vent their Ivy league, grotesquely detached opinions that Trump winning = the “end of democracy.” (Note, kudos to the inimitable Walter Kirn for his witty, ironic commentary in the X post):

The Times cannot lie straight in bed. The experts in gaslighting tell you that never in America’s 250-year history have we face the coming autocratic rule; neatly omitting the very “autocrat” they rail against was President less than four years ago.  The pearl-clutching character of the Times’ top talent is embarrassing. 

NBC’s Insane-asylum bait Rachel Madcow was front and center for her deep-state sponsors, using the exact same coordinated term declaring that a democratic mandate of the electorate was a determination of a new form of government: “STRONGMAN AUTHORITARIAN” rule:

After the leftist honchos at New York Time and NBC pushed out the “Strongman” deep state talking points, the rest began screaming in unison for CENSORSHIP.  State sponsored PROPAGANDA marched lockstep to promote CENSORSHIP.

The witches at The View were back to attempting to terrorize women, while demanding censorship:

Biden’s White House spokesperson Psaki demanded we turn full blown East Germany:

MSNBC demanded Elon Musk’s scalp:

CNN laments the Rogan and Musk efforts to restore the 1st Amendment:

Joes Scarborough loses his mind ranting about censoring “disinformation”, while spewing bucket loads himself:

It would appear that corporate media has decided it will not or perhaps cannot change. They are acting like the financial slaves of oligarchic forces much more powerful than themselves. However, those forces face a financial conundrum. A definite majority of the country voted in defiance of corporate media’s narratives and dictates. Clearly more than half the country doesn’t give a whit what corporate media broadcasts day in and day out. To the degree that that majority sustains itself and increases, so too increases the necessity for financial sponsors to redirect their financials resources to channels that reach that majority.

As long as we live in a somewhat free market economy, the oligarchs holding the most chips are going to have to be the first to have a change of heart.  And it will be financial reasons that force them to, not ideological . There have been glimmerings of shifts in views of oligarchs like Bezos and Zuckerberg lately – but only after others cleared the way and helped remove potential financial disincentives.  If the government cannot nationalize social media and its citizen independent media and thereby control our minds directly with censorship and propaganda the money cannot sustainably continue to flow in the direction of censorship/propaganda outlets. 

The free market financial incentive above is diametrically opposed by the big government gravy train D.C. blob (that is millions of federal employees, Military-Industrial-complex, vast non-government organizations (NGO) taxpayer-funded networks).  It is utterly dependent upon the Censorship/propaganda industrial complex for its continued existence. It will be a Godzilla vs. King Kong colossal knock-down, drag-out struggle between the two with Trump in office. The government-state economy vs. the free-market economy. If the former wins there will be increasing censorship/propaganda from here on out. Should the latter prevail, the Bill of Rights has a chance.  

The ultimate answer to the original question “is corporate media dead?” will be determined by a single factor.  It is highlighted by an exchange Scientology’s leader once had with a couple of corporate news reporters. They asked him to define power. He replied that power is determined solely on the basis of whether folks listen to whoever it is that attempts to control affairs. So it will go with corporate media. It is dead to the degree the exodus of erstwhile viewers continues to grow. So far, so good:  see. Exodus from Corporate Media post election.

The purpose of this blog since March was to advocate making restoration of the 1st Amendment to the Constitution, particularly its free speech and press provisions, a central issue in the 2024 Presidential election. (see e.g.  Keeping It Simple In 2024)

Hopefully, we have made a step forward. In the meantime, with corporate media’s death-throes-like desperate appeals for censorship measures, it will do us good to recall from whence we came.  America’s premiere censorship/propaganda expert/whistleblower/educator Mike Benz sums it up best. In the course of doing so, he answers a question lingering for many today: how on earth were so many votes cast in 2020 for a party that did not even bother to hit the campaign trail, as compared to four years later when virtually every celebrity on the planet pimped non-stop for its candidate?

Comments Off on Is Corporate Media Dead?

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged , , , , ,

Election 2024 – Peaceful Protests or Insurrections?

Posted on November 2, 2024 by | Comments Off on Election 2024 – Peaceful Protests or Insurrections?

In the spring of 1959 Edward Hunter, an intelligence agent posing as a journalist, described to a Senate committee the discovery of a then-unknown technique called “mind attack” – a method for changing people’s minds to make them love things they once hated and/or hate things they once loved.  Mind attack (or mind control) tactics were further exposed in the 1970’s by L. Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology and a former U.S. naval office familiar with intelligence techniques. He published an essay in the 1970s that warned of a dastardly government intelligence trick of thought control through censorship and propaganda. He suggested the Intelligence Community (IC) had been utilizing this method for years and that unchecked it could have detrimental effects on society. The technique was propaganda execution by way of redefining words (Orwellian Newspeak if you will).  At that very time, Scientology was a recognized religion and was in the process of being redefined by Big Pharma and the IC as a ‘cult’. With that label comes suspension of civil rights and human liberties. Because it wasn’t other folks’ ox being obviously gored, few paid attention to the process but accepted the result. If you look you will learn that such techniques are being applied far more broadly today. Unless the level of state media and internet control is reversed, some of our most important societal leaders will ultimately be dismissed as quacks and cult members. Central to the operation is propaganda by redefinition of words.

The Neo Liberal Orders’ Censorship/Propaganda Industrial Complex (CPIC) is playing out George Orwell’s 1984 by implementing Newspeak. In 1984 Newspeak sums up as WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, and IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH.  Today we add to the lexicon, PLUTOCRACY IS DEMOCRACY, CENSORSHIP IS FREEDOM OF SPEECH, VIOLENCE/VANDALISM IS LAW/ORDER.

Many are seeing this, including heads of the sovereign states remaining defiant against the Neo Liberal Order push for global autocratic rule.  Here is Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban alerting to it earlier this year:

“In the past the communists employed a five-step procedure to subjugate us by stealth. Now the progressives are emulating them. With these five steps they are turning the organs of the state into tools of oppression.

First, they reformulate norms. George Orwell saw this, and described it thus: “War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.” The first step in the progressive liberals’ program of oppression is to take a norm and give it the precisely opposite meaning. “War is peace” is something that progressives also say today. “Peace facility”: this is the name of the Brussels financial fund from which they send the most destructive weapons to the front. “Migration is a resource”, they say—while crime rises, the threat of terrorism increases, and trust is drained from our societies.”

 A lot of this sinister word play is already firmly entrenched in the corporate media and organized education in America.  For example, a couple years ago we were overwhelmed with scare tactics to drop objections to the Biden Administration’s INFLATION REDUCTION ACT. Yet, since its shotgun passage, inflation has continued to be a scourge to all but the top .1 %. To those in the know, the result was obvious since the bill accelerated already out of control government spending. Recently a former Federal Reserve Bank governor was asked what can we possibly do to scale back runaway inflation. His only answer was to reign in the INFLATION REDUCTION ACT. I other words, what the establishment serves to us as the solution, in fact is the problem  Propaganda by redefinition of words at work. You see government stooges (from New Times columnists to all network talking head “experts”) scolding the masses that they can’t get it through their thick skulls “Bidenomics is killing it”, while increasing portions of the population go under to rising inflation and fewer job advancement opportunities. 

Today Big Brother, through its CPIC, is literally peddling STUPIDITY IS LITERACY. And they are coming for your children. The government is doing it through Orwellian titled “media literacy” programs. They are designed to inculcate school children with the idea that the only true information is Big Brother authorized information. In other words, discouraging curiosity, exploration, research, and critical thinking. They are trying to force kids to accept information only from the folks who tell them that they must agree to the INFLATION REDUCTION ACT while its implementation eats away their paychecks with more spiraling inflation. They are telling them that the only truth is what they are fed through government agencies, or their fully controlled news organs, to wit, Wikipedia, and the “legacy” or “mainstream” corporate media.

It is spreading like a cancer. Preeminent CPIC expert Mike Benz explains:

Hence, Ignorance is Literacy.

Remember the NLO (New Liberal Order) intelligentsia’s constant lament a few years ago: “how are we ever going to progress if we don’t agree on the facts?” (as they see them of course). Thus, the rise of the CPIC.  Censorship and Propaganda in unprecedented quantities notwithstanding, the NLO still can’t control minds sufficiently to stay in power. Thus, the need to reprogram our minds by rewriting the very language we’ve slowly and surely developed and become accustomed to over the past 10,000 years. At what point does enough become enough?

The other 4 Steps of modern-day mind control that Prime Minister Orban refers to above are also instructive:

The second step is to use the instruments of the state to start spreading this inverted normality. Anyone who thinks otherwise is problematic: there is something wrong with them. Anyone who thinks otherwise is either ignorant or insane. The perception must be created that listening to them would lead to some fatal catastrophe.

Then comes the third step, when they spread the word that because you hold dangerous views, you are also a security risk. They set some sort of fact-checker or democracy watchdog on you, and it is established that you do not share the views of normality that they preach, and that therefore you are a radical whose freedom of speech they need not hesitate to restrict.

Then, in the fourth step, they incite the liberal press to attack you. Activists are mobilized, and then you are silenced through litigation. This leads to the sphere of fake depictions of you on the internet, denunciation on social media, and a horde of civil society entities bombarding the courts and state bodies with accusations against you.

And if you survive all that, the fifth step is for state bodies to spring into action. They have received so many complaints and accusations that they are obliged to investigate you. This is how public bodies become the private institutions of the progressives. They find that the accusations in the media and the concerns of the watchdogs are well founded, they indict you, and in the end state bodies are used to silence you. This is what they do to Hungary in Brussels, and this is what they do to conservatives in progressive liberal European capitals. The same thing is happening in the United States, where court proceedings are being used to try to remove President Donald Trump from the ballot. This is what happened in the European Union when they tried to use administrative procedures to impose a travel ban on Tucker Carlson. It is happening in Germany, where political parties are being monitored by the intelligence services. And it happened in Finland, when they wanted to prosecute a politician and a bishop for quoting Scripture.

As it happens Orban turns out to be pretty accurate. What he did not predict was what comes next when all of the above doesn’t work. Well, we have now seen that too.

After the United States government (with its compliant corporate media) applied steps 1-5 above toward front-running candidate, former-president Donald Trump, they tried to murder him in cold blood on national television:

Two months later, with virtually no accountability assumed for its abject failures during the first assassination attempt, they tried again:

The first assassin had unexplained connections to the FBI: First Assassin .

The second assassin had unexplained connections to the CIA:

Short take:  Second Assassin summary

More in-depth take: Second Assassin more in-depth

One could call these connections ‘conspiracy  theories’, but that would be incorrect. They are far more concrete and factual than any explanation (or lack thereof) that government agencies have provided on the assassination attempts to date. 

Acting like a third world banana republic dictatorship, the United States government and its lapdog corporate media has all but buried the stories of back to back assassination attempts on President Trump, while they continue to promote further attempts.

On the eve of perhaps the most hotly contested Presidential election in United States history, what is next? 

The grand inquisitor of the infamous congressional J6 committee (Jamie Raskin) promises to deny the will of the people should they favor Trump on election day. Consequently, he contends the D.C. oligarchy is preparing for “Civil War conditions” (by the way difficult to find on Youtube or Bing videos):

Never mind that Raskin promises to do what he and the corporate media falsely tried and convicted Trump of in the J6 show trials. All of this hypocritical hocus pocus is possible only in an Orwellian world where the very definitions of words are fungible, depending on one’s political beliefs or affiliation. Should the left lose and CIA rent-a-riot squads take to the streets (ala summer of 2020, BLM/Antifa) extreme property destruction and violence will be called “mostly peaceful demonstrations.”  Should the left lose, if there is any completely peaceable conservative acts of protest the corporate media will call them “violent insurrection.”  In the official D.C. vernacular Insurrection will become Law and Order and vice versa depending on which train of thought prevails. 

To ensure that both sides of the aisle are equally incensed come election day, corporate media has come up with a far-fetched, pearl-clutching theory. On the eve of the election the New York Times (flanked by the Washington Post) issued a heavily promoted “story” that declared that conservatives expressing doubt of the fairness of the 2020 election undermines public confidence in the 2024 election. They conclude such views should have been censored by YouTube and because they were not, the 2024 election has somehow been compromised.

No matter what side you are on, brace yourself.  Big Brother’s colossal mismanagement of affairs guarantees that whichever side loses will believe and behave as if it were cheated. 

Comments Off on Election 2024 – Peaceful Protests or Insurrections?

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Propaganda Hit Man

Posted on October 15, 2024 by | Comments Off on Propaganda Hit Man

Alex Gibney sets his sights on bringing down Elon Musk

Alex Gibney seems to be fond of rushing to comply with oligarchy-friendly deadlines. He is reported to be feverishly attempting to get a major smear on Elon Musk released before the November election. Musk is the last bastion of free speech and press in America and believes President Trump is particularly motivated to restore those rights. Musk’s support might be Trump’s strongest chance of success. Thus, the oligarchy has clear motivation for taking Musk out of the running. Gibney has a history of delivering October surprises against Trump in particular; populists being anathema to continued oligarchy rule. If Gibney doesn’t make the deadline you can count on him leading the First-Amendment-burning pack post election.

In October 2020 Gibney rushed out his hit piece on Trump’s handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic. After it helped serve the oligarchy’s purpose of defeating Trump, virtually all of its major premises were proven utterly false (see Whistleblower Character Assassin).  Gibney as much as admitted his motivations in a “progressive” love fest with MSNBC’s Chris Hayes: “It [Trump Pandemic hit]  was intended to come out just before the election of 2020 as a referendum on Trump’s handling of the COVID crisis.”

Gibney’s documentary series Enemies: The President, Justice and the FBI came out (November 2018) a few months before Special Prosecutor Muller’s report on the Russia Hoax (April 2019).  In context, Gibney’s work looks like a patent attempt to influence the outcome of the investigation. It is a four-episode series. Gibney had some lackies at his production company direct the first three episodes. Those segments view like an FBI recruitment film. They are thoroughly left-leaning propaganda pieces exalting the FBI as a democracy-saving institution time and again. Gibney has his boys position the FBI as superior to the office to which its charter makes it serve at the pleasure of: the Presidency. It is pure autocratic propaganda (in the East German and Soviet traditions) in that it elevates the bureaucracy (read politburo) over the will of the people. Even elected Presidents must bow at the altar of the unelected deep state. Gibney gives a new meaning to shallow in using the Watergate and Iran-Contra scandals to serve as narratives for his conclusion: FBI career men equal good, elected Republican Presidents equal evil. All the while he continually – almost by subliminal deception – associates Trump to the alleged sins of Nixon and Reagan (as if they are the same corrupt being occupying three separate bodies). By this technique Gibney murders history, turning scoundrels into saints and turning populists into satans. 

Once this us vs. them, cowboys vs. indians simplistic look at history is established, Gibney takes over the reins to personally direct the final segment: a no-holds-barred WWE-like attempted take down of President Trump.

Gibney ham-fistedly pounds on his designated enemy while genuflecting at the feet of his deep state benefactors. Perhaps even worse than former communist bloc propaganda, within months of its release the events it reports as inevitable turns of history prove to be 180 degree opposite to reality (some of the commie prop took decades to discredit). Eventually, virtually every major thesis of Gibney’s propaganda is found to be erroneous in one definitive, authoritative report (see REPORT ON MATTERS RELATED TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES AND INVESTIGATIONS ARISING OUT OF THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS). This 100% discreditation of the foundation of the documentary is precisely what occurred with Gibney’s COVID-19 character assassination attempt, see Big Brother Storyteller II.

Enemies liberally uses a now well-worn propaganda technique that Gibney apparently stole from a couple of rookie filmmakers when going after Scientology.  See Gibney Propaganda Technique).  That is, Gibney’s cast consists of media people who narrate and comment, merrily mixing opinion and spin with ‘fact.’ Gibney compensates for the lack of evidence to support the official narrative by having his media hacks characterize the “evidence” he does submit. One recurring talking head is Garrett Graff known for many gigs as the smooth talking ‘expert’ on cheesy cable channel documentaries. Media analyst Howard Kurtz exposed how Graff wound up with that role, “Garrett Graff spent enough time as a campaign flack to learn the art of the politically adept reply.” That was precisely the skill Gibney called on, having Graff backfill evidentiary holes with slippery characterizations. 

The amateur-hour like opening frames are instructive of Gibney’s motives and methods:

Faceless, unattributed voice from nowhere (whiningly and ominously):

“The idea that the President would fire an FBI Director in the middle of the Russian investigation is unthinkable!”

Garret Graff (dramatically and incredulously): 

“This was the target of an investigation trying to choose the person who is investigating him.”

Gibney himself (with pearl-clutching concern):

“And what kind of constitutional problem is that to him?”

Graff (literally chuckling and guffawing like a junior high school punk giving someone a wedgie):

“A HUGE one, hardy, har, har, har!”

Let’s break that passage down.

The film’s first premise is false. It was very “thinkable” that a president would fire an FBI director who was actively leaking privileged communications to corporate media in an attempt to smear and harm the President with false charges, which is precisely what proved to be the case.

The second premise of the film was false. The President was not the target of the investigation, and he was not being investigated according to public statements then-recently made by that very FBI director who was fired.

The third premise of the film was a complete invention by Alex Gibney; there was no constitutional issue whatsoever. The FBI director serves at the pleasure of the President. End of story.  But, Gibney goes on for another hour desperately trying to stick it to Trump.

And that is just the intro, before the opening credits are even through rolling across the screen.

The very first frames of the body of the film show that traitorous FBI director James Comey literally yucking it up a year later with Stephen Colbert while sipping wine on television. Gibney then spends an hour trashing Trump on the innuendo (no facts, pure smear by association and demonization) of a documented liar. The ‘victim’ of Gibney’s piece turned out to be perhaps the most infamous prima donna drama queen of the 21st Century. 

Gibney follows with a virtual dog and pony show of deep state hacks and corporate media shills dramatically laying down every lie of the greatest hoax of the 21st Century; that is the big Russia Scare (see, A Guide To Understanding the Hoax of the Century).  Perhaps the biggest and most important whopper of them all was the Big Lie that was repeated over and over again by Comey, a plethora of FBI lackies, and the corporate media: The Russians hacked the DNC and provided the info to the Trump campaign. That served as the foundation for the bigger lie of a broad, verified Russian infiltration campaign to control the 2016 election outcome.

Gibney went into propaganda overdrive on this one. He provided a heap of special effects cyberworld graphics to dramatize the hack, while his talking heads filled in the gaps to implant the lie visually in viewers’ minds. He presented as if this was the official hands-on work of his revered G men. Gibney then goes into a retrospective likening the matter to Watergate, but far worse because with Trump, it had the added sex appeal of a foreign-enemy actor: “The Russians Are Coming!”.  So unanimous and uncritical have the state sponsored corporate media become, they continued to hammer these themes home over the next several years. 

It turned out that the Federal government never even made that connection Gibney portrays it as making, despite the Department of Justice’s (including the FBI) all hands on deck attempt to smear Trump. Instead, it was the cybersecurity firm hired by the Democrat National Committee (DNC) itself, Crowdstrike. Despite several years of effort, the DNC prevented the FBI from examining the DNC servers – the only way to potentially determine the source of a hack. When Crowdstrike’s CEO Shawn Henry was finally put under oath in a non-public Congressional Oversight Committee meeting, he had to admit  that they had no evidence of a Russian connection to the hack, let alone a channel leading to the Trump campaign.  Despite this, Committee Chairman, representative Adam Schiff of California, kept this admission secret during his serial MSNBC and CNN appearances to infer there was in fact secret evidence before the committee linking Russia to the hack and Russia to Trump. Let that sink in for a moment. Schiff, the ranking Committee member misinformed the public continually for several years while keeping the contrary evidence, Crowdstrike CEO’s testimony, under Congressional seal.

By the time other congress members managed to unseal the Crowdstrike testimony – 2 years after Gibney’s documentary – the damage had been done.  And of course, the corporate media never bothered to correct the record. Nor did Muller. Nor did Comey. Nor did the Department of Justice. Nor did the FBI. And of course, nor did Gibney; he just sat like the grinning cat who ate the canary, while he continued collecting royalty checks. 

Gibney assisted deep state spooks like James Clapper, James Comey, Bob Muller, and the state-controlled corporate media to smear Trump solely on the basis of Crowdstrike’s (DNC’s) Shawn Henry’s slippery, evasive innuendo. Gibney did this by not making it clear that Comey’s FBI and Muller never inspected the DNC servers; making it appear that Comey and Muller were Johnnies on the spot saving the republic with their own elbow grease. And of course Gibney abetted the obstruction of justice by burying the incestuous relationships that enabled the fraudulent narrative to hold water. In particular, Shawn Henry’s pre-Crowdstrike gig was this:  Executive Assistant to the Director of the FBI (Robert Muller).  Henry was hired by DNC lawyers Perkins Coie, the same firm that hired the author of the phony ‘British Intelligence’ dossier, Chistopher Steele; which served as justification to wiretap the Trump campaign and smear him with invented lies pre and post-election. (See REPORT ON MATTERS RELATED TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES AND INVESTIGATIONS ARISING OUT OF THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS)

It doesn’t get any more incestuous than this. Yet, Gibney actively suppresses the real sources and their relationships for his unadulterated smear piece. He covers for the inbreeders with this type of icon worshipping: “Bob Muller was the symbol of a non-partisan individual who keeps his head down, follows the facts wherever they lead and doesn’t care about making a name for himself.”

If you doubt any of the counter evidence presented, do your mind a favor and take a few minutes to study up on the matter here, NO PROOF OF RUSSIAN HACK, and here, Durham Report.

Even though the revered Muller struck out as far as making any significant connection between the Trump campaign and Russia, let alone Russian hacking, Gibney’s blatant attempt to pressure Muller seems to have had the intended result. Muller did what Muller always does. In the face of no evidence and no indictment, he still managed to smear his target (Trump) with a plethora of subjunctive hearsay (would, could, might have, probably, etc.); a dis-barrable offense were he not the darling of the deep state and its lapdog corporate media. Once again the Scientology canary-in-the-coalmine connection arises. Muller did the very same thing to the Scientologists in the late eighties and in the 2000’s: pursued them noisily and at great taxpayer expense, only to wind up smearing them with no indictment to show for it. Award winning journalist Peter Lance wrote a series of books exposing the negligent and corrupt nature of the Department of Justice in its mishandling of the war on terror from the early nineties leading all the way up to 9/11. Lance pulls the Wizard-of-Oz curtain on Muller demonstrating the 2010s corporate media worship of him was as phony as a three-dollar bill.  (see Peter Lance)

Just as he did in his hatchet job on Julian Assange and Chelsea Manning, Gibney could not resist accusing Trump of sex crimes by highlighting the never confirmed, since thoroughly debunked, DNC-purchased accusations:

“Unusual sexual activities with prostitutes in Russia…filmed by Russian intelligence for possible use as blackmail.”

Once again (see Whistleblower Character Assassin) Gibney betrays his sociopathic characteristic of “projection”; accusing others of his own intentions. His alter-ego Weiner says “Trump is the kind of guy who likes to make his own reality”, while Gibney weaves a literally created deep state narrative about Trump.

Ironically, the one minor critique mentioned by a talking head about Comey is an indictment against Gibney’s documentary itself:  “There is something really horrible about having a senior law enforcement official evaluating the conduct of somebody in public whom he is not going to charge; and I have a sort of civil liberties anxiety about that.”  (in reference to Comey’s 2016 press conference about not filing charges against Hillary Clinton)

News alert!  That is the entire basis and subject of Gibney’s documentary against Trump.  Simple and plain.  But it is worse. In Clinton’s case there was a boatload of evidence warranting prosecution. Comey’s justification for not indicting was that a jury might acquit her. As covered, in Trump’s case there was zero evidence.

Ultimately, the entire foundation of the Russia Hoax and Gibney’s film was found to be without merit.  In November 2019, after Muller struck out, the Department of Justice appointed a new Special Prosecutor, Robert Durham, to investigate what all the ‘Russians are Coming’ alarms were about.  Durham found that not only was collusion never proven, there was not even a legal basis for beginning the Russia Hoax investigation in the first instance:

“Indeed, based on the evidence gathered in the multiple exhaustive and costly federal investigations of these matters, including the instant investigation, neither U.S. law enforcement nor the Intelligence Community appears to have possessed any actual evidence of collusion in their holdings at the commencement of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.”

Even a short passage in the film that shows Congressman Devin Nunes rightfully challenging Comey’s hole-filled narrative, is met with a former Obama apparatchik condemning any consideration of absence of guilt (in a case investigated for many years rending zero evidence of guilt):

“If you think about the antics of Devin Nunes there is some deep, deep worries that there are people in Congress who don’t care about the law, who don’t care about the Constitution.”

In Gibney’s Orwellian deep state, a defense is categorized as a thought crime.

Over dramatic music and a slew of Nixon and Reagan shots subliminally blaming their alleged crimes on Trump, Gibney winds up the film with voice overs warning of the dissolution of the Republic if Trump is not taken out. In this macabre denouement Gibney’s alter-ego reveals his motivation and purposes. Weiner closes with “If we are going to make it (as a Republic)…we have to get through this in a way that our institutions and our rule of law are strengthened.”

And so, the Empire’s storyteller continues the attack on the will of the electorate and the Constitution with the authority of the politburo and its partisan dispensation of injustice on anyone who dares not to think in lockstep with it.

Comments Off on Propaganda Hit Man

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Whistleblower Character Assassin

Posted on September 26, 2024 by | Comments Off on Whistleblower Character Assassin

Filmmaker Alex Gibney

When asked about Alex Gibney’s in-progress documentary on himself, Elon Musk replied, “It’s a hit piece.”  Gibney’s reaction to that was, “How would you know?”

The answer is more than apparent on this blog.  Musk has done more than any other person to date to dismantle the burgeoning Censorship/Propaganda Industrial Complex. The very industry Gibney sucks the hind tit of for a living. Look no further than what Gibney did to Julian Assange and Wikileaks when they were at the forefront of restoring transparency and accountability to Big Brother.

When Wikileaks founder Assange exposed the sinister side of American empire in 2010, the national security state came unglued. Perhaps no one more accurately represented the security state (also known as IC “intelligence community”) at that time than Michael Hayden. Between 1998 and 2009 he had served on the three top spy positions on the planet, the head of the National Security Agency (NSA), the Director of the CIA and as the 1st Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence. Under his guidance the national security state was formed, including the passage of the Patriot Act and its systematic stripping of our civil rights. Incidentally, he remains atop the Big Brother console to this day as head of the Atlantic Council’s Censorship/Propaganda Industrial Complex. 

Who did Hayden and company call upon when Assange and Wikileaks were awakening the world to the atrocities of the unbridled security state/IC? The documentarian who would give the head of the security state the platform from which to justify the horrendous conduct revealed by Wikileaks, while also viciously assassinating the character of Assange. The same guy who did principal Big Brother propaganda work for the COVID-19 roll out: Alex Gibney. 

Nothing more graphically represented the importance of the 2010 Wikileaks disclosures than the following video. It captures US military personnel gunning down several innocent civilians, including a Reuter’s news agency employee a rescue worker and his two children. See,

The nation was shocked. And Gibney gave it his all to get the masses to cool their jets with his documentary “We Steal Secrets.”  He featured Michael Hayden himself to tell us how to view this very leaked film. Haydn said he could understand how such abuses of imperial power bothers some people but not someone in the know like himself: “You’ve got this scene, some are evidently troubled by the scene – frankly, I’m not.”  Gibney then invites Hayden to explain how Assange put so many more lives at risk than were wiped out in the video, that there really is nothing to see here folks. Clearly, Gibney wholeheartedly agrees with his master as he fails to even once push back on the single person most responsible for the conduct Wikileaks exposed. 

And as is Gibney’s wont (see Big Brother Storyteller), he is so anxious to be the first to get the deep state’s spin released he doesn’t bother to examine any harm that Hayden alleges Assange’s releases will certainly do. In the final analysis, no one ever produced a single sliver of evidence that a single hair on a single head was harmed as a result of Wikileaks’ exposes. To the contrary one could easily imagine tens of thousands of lives being saved by the disclosures, by having its intended reform effect on the offenders. 

Thus self-blinded, Gibney sets out to destroy the reputation of Assange. He strings together a chorus of clips from his favorite politicians toeing the CIA/NSA/Hayden line literally calling for Assange to be hung to death or assassinated. 

The film largely consists of Gibney belittling and condemning Assange as a sociopath who might well be entitled to such treatment. In doing so, he also does a number on Chelsea (aka Bradley) Manning who was the military whistleblower who forwarded the leaked material to Wikileaks for publication. Gibney is a proud woke mind virus carrier. Nonetheless, he hypocritically devotes a great deal of time trying to smear Manning with his struggle over gender identity. Gibney ruthlessly paints Manning – a genuine American hero on the order of Daniel Ellsberg – as a psychotic sexual deviant. Gibney does so in order to create the invented picture that Assange took advantage of Manning and set him up to take the rap for the leak while hogging all the glory to himself.  In doing so, Gibney kills two Ellsbergs with one stone.

Through outright sleaze and cheesy propaganda techniques Gibney invents the narrative that Assange baited Manning into releasing the material to Wikileaks. In reality, the New York Times and the Washington Post (the “liberal” fronts for Empire fuckery) turned down approaches from Manning before he turned to Wikileaks. Yet, Gibney’s expert use of the dark arts makes it appear as though if not for Assange’s fraudulent preying upon a weak, perverted mind, Manning never would be in the deep trouble he was by then in (in solitary confinement awaiting trial for Treason and worse before a US military tribunal).  

The same techniques used to assassinate Manning’s character are applied by Gibney in pursuing Assange as prey.  He ruthlessly explores Assange’s private sex life and goes to great length to indict and convict him for the alleged crime of intentionally breaking his condom during sex with more than willing partners (perhaps even sexual predators pursuing Assange). If you are wondering how that might constitute a prosecutable crime, Gibney’s invents the speculation that it would be a crime if Assange happened to knowingly be carrying around the AIDS virus. While the entire premise of Gibney’s prosecution (justification for the Swedish government pursuing Assange) hinged on that one invented possibility, Gibney (and no one else in the 14 years since) never presented a scintilla of evidence such was the actual case. Yet, through master use of the dark arts of cinematographic deception Gibney presents the picture of an AIDs ravaged madman travelling the world seeking to kill through sex.  

With those false premises established, Gibney then virtually lobbies for the criminal punishment of Julian Assange.  He accuses Assange of paranoia for suggesting that the U.S. government has Assange in its sights for the same treatment they were meting out to Chelsea Manning.  Gibney appears to want Assange to take the punishment Manning is taking; all the while calling Assange paranoid for sensing that is exactly the intent of Gibney and his deep state sponsors. 

The utter falsity of Gibney’s “paranoia” claims were more than proven over the next several years as the US ruthlessly pursued Assange through extradition (while its CIA director called for Assange’s assassination).  Completely contrary to the entire premise of Gibney’s invented outrage, Assange would wind up spending more time in confinement than Manning did (without ever being convicted of a single crime). Of course, Gibney helped accomplish this feat by virtue of other state-controlled media parroting Gibney’s deep-state smear for years. 

There is a pattern of Gibney’s over-anxious, impatient attack-dog work on behalf of the deep state.  He did the very same thing concerning the COVID-19 pandemic panic (see Big Brother Storyteller).  A rush to release the definitive government/big pharma COVID 19 narrative, followed by several years of the truth unfolding proving all his major premises to be wrong. He did the same with the Scientologists, tirelessly using his ‘documentary’ on them to lobby for removal of their IRS tax exemption, only for time to tell his invented premises for such draconian measures were fabrications. I have described before the fraud perpetuated and promoted by Larry Wright and Alex Gibney on that subject. (see blog posts between June 6 2017 through June 19 2017 and from July 16 2017 and August 8 2017).

As we shall later see, Gibney did the same with the Russia Hoax. The technique is, when chaos hits be the first to create a “documentary” to “prove” the deep state’s propaganda lines. Make the big lies look like truth through overboard dramatization in the guise of documentary film making. Use the ‘fact’ of the documentary to take designated targets down hard. While the facts begin to arise demonstrating the falsity of your work, dive into the next deep state crisis and rinse and repeat.

To demonstrate the 100% love, devotion and surrender nature of the deep state suck up, consider these facts. If the Manning/Assange leak were as expansive and potentially destructive as Gibney’s film claims, and Gibney is the flag-waving patriot he purports to be, then why did Gibney not investigate how two allegedly mentally ill, sex deviants managed to put the entire free world at risk all on their little lonesomes? That is, how could such alleged supermen as Michael Hayden be capable of such incompetent, treasonous insecurity?  That, Gibney does not investigate. Instead, he only covers deep-state ass. Again, he turns to his master Hayden to explain away the pesky matter of how on earth such a massive breach could occur. Hayden blames reforms imposed in response to the deep state’s colossal incompetence (at best) demonstrated during the events leading to 911. 

Hayden:

“After 9/11 we were accused of not being willing to share information rapidly and facilely enough and we’ve pushed that very far forward. In terms of our focus the default option in a practical sense has been to share it, rather than caging in information and making it more difficult to flow.”

In other words, “any attempt to point out an error on the Intelligence Community will be met with glue meeting rubber. That is, your catching us out on a mistake will result in you being guilty of our next crime.”

Remarkably, not only does Gibney not push back on such haughty arrogance, he lets Hayden shore up alleged CIA infallibility with this:

“When they catch us making a mistake, we admit it. When they have a valid point—even when it’s buried deep below a heap of not-so-valid points—we try to pull it out, brush it off, and address it.”

With that Gibney enters the Orwellian ranks, “war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength.”

State-controlled media would of course cloyingly go along for the ride as per usual.

And that of course buried any dissent to Gibney’s propaganda work.  But, at the time of its release many credible sources expressed outrage at Gibney’s servile cowardice. 

The Nation had the following to say of “We Steal Secrets”:

“Unfortunately, just as today’s debate is already being diluted by focusing on Snowden’s psychology and motives, We Steal Secrets gets sidetracked by character issues… The debate that the film has stirred up consists mainly of an exchange of invective between Gibney and Assange, in which Gibney and his allies compare the WikiLeaks creator to a cult leader, while Assange and his allies accuse the director of mounting a smear campaign that benefits the US government. The upshot is that we have gotten neither the film nor the debate we need.”

Award winning researcher and journalist Alexa O’Brien wrote:

“What was Gibney relying on for his costly ‘string of pearls’ reportage, beyond his hackneyed entourage of unexamined glory-boats, bearing witness on the silver screen to their privileged punditry—that is, talking about themselves amongst themselves for their own benefit– certainly not the public’s—or future generations?”

“Gibney’s exercise discovers nothing, and reveals nothing. His tabloid motion graphic is a regurgitation of stock footage, unsubstantiated innuendo, and unexamined allegation.”

“What Gibney has done here is not art; it is a cheap trick.”

And veteran war correspondent Chris Hedges wrote the following:

“Alex Gibney’s new film, “We Steal Secrets,” is about WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange. It dutifully peddles the state’s contention that WikiLeaks is not a legitimate publisher and that Bradley Manning, who allegedly passed half a million classified Pentagon and State Department documents to WikiLeaks, is not a legitimate whistle-blower. It interprets acts of conscience and heroism by Assange and Manning as misguided or criminal. It holds up the powerful—who are responsible for the plethora of war crimes Manning and Assange exposed–as, by comparison, trustworthy and reasonable.”

“The film at many points is a trashy exercise in tabloid journalism. Gibney panders to popular culture’s taste for cheap pop psychology and obsession with sex, salacious gossip and trivia.”

Finally, Hedges recognizes the illness underlying the propaganda techniques employed:

“The vast structural sin Assange and Manning fought is ignored. The primacy of personal piety over justice is the inversion of morality. It is the sickness of our age.”

Remarkably, on this rare occasion when Gibney was held to account for his demonstration of the sickness of our age he petulantly defended his tabloid appetites. Unfortunately for him he protested too much and as much as admitted to the truth of what the Nation, O’Brien and Hedges pointed out:

“Just because someone tries to right a wrong or just because somebody tries to hold powerful people to account, it doesn’t mean that person is above the law.” – Alex Gibney

Under that ‘rationale’, Gibney is free to pursue whistleblowers into their prison cells and beyond.  

Given how Gibney approached whistleblowers Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange, what are the odds he’ll take a deep dive into Elon Musk’s sex life?  One thing is certain, Gibney will make the gullible afraid of Mr. Musk, very afraid. 

I have seen up close and personal how deftly Gibney wields the art of cinematography to create realities that do no exist, and to dramatize them to the point of creating revulsion and terror in viewers. For a short lesson on Gibney’s trickery, see what he did to the Scientologists; creating a “guttural, deep emotional fear and terror of something that does not exist”, Going Clear Movie.

Comments Off on Whistleblower Character Assassin

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rescue The Republic

Posted on September 19, 2024 by | Comments Off on Rescue The Republic

Maybe there is hope that the firm grip of Big Brother might be wrestled loose:

Home

Comments Off on Rescue The Republic

Posted in Uncategorized

Freedom of Speech and Conscience

Posted on September 17, 2024 by | Comments Off on Freedom of Speech and Conscience

Finally, the issue is going to be put front and center at least by one of the four remaining members of Presidential election tickets. JD Vance declared the following on X yesterday:

For the next 7 weeks of this campaign, I will vigorously defend your right to speak your mind.

As those following this blog know, that is precisely what we have been advocating, see e.g. Keeping It Simple in 2024. In a lengthy post Vance cites the recent outrageous Thought Control being waged on the American public by the mainstream media and its State sponsors. See, JD Vance puts Free Speech front and center.

As we have discussed here for months, Vance is noticing the vicious result when organized government censorship is combined with organized government continual propaganda. It is very dangerous mix. The message to the public is: If you disagree you not only deserve to be censored and deprogrammed, but if you persist in resistance to the machine, you deserve to be dead.

On the very day of Vance’s post, Leftist Oligarch Hillary Clinton advocated locking up those who utter speech that doesn’t align with the Oligarchy’s approved narratives,

And it ain’t just that prehistoric cretin:

Hopefully, Vance will follow through with the promise to “vigorously defend your right to speak your mind.” Clearly, it is in need of the most vigorous of defenses.

Comments Off on Freedom of Speech and Conscience

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged , , , , ,

Big Brother Storyteller II

Posted on September 1, 2024 by | Comments Off on Big Brother Storyteller II

(Reference: Big Brother’s Storyteller)

Documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney is practiced at the art of taking obvious government issued propaganda narratives, and dressing them up to make them look somehow edgy, original and provocative. He is like an accomplished dramatist posing as a documentarian. Like the first spook storyteller we covered, Lawrence Wright (Big Brother’s Storyteller), he did yeoman’s work in promoting the deep state narrative concerning the COVID pandemic.

Gibney’s documentary, “Totally Under Control” (TUC), is the sort of political hack, partisan perversion you would expect from erstwhile Soviet Communist outlets like Pravda and Tass. But Gibney’s use of ‘art’ to communicate propaganda numbingly amplifies the ugly, false dissonance.  So over the top is Gibney’s characterization of now-proven lies and painting of chosen villains as evil and chosen heroes as angelic, TUC plays out like a Marvel comic. It is all-evil President Donald Trump vs. all-Godlike deep-state bureaucrats and the political masters they serve. The facts often get in the way of the narrative, so the ‘documentary’ serves largely to flip the truth on its head. 

TUC begins dramatically and graphically with an easily disproven propaganda-line pandemic big lie. Gibney as narrator laments the tragedy he labels the US’s response to the COVID 19 crisis.  He compares it by death rate to the darling of the pandemic, South Korea. In doing so Gibney never examines, let alone mentions critical facts.  First, it soon became common knowledge that deaths were overwhelmingly prevalent in the co-morbid – an inconvenient truth Gibney gives zero air time to. That is, people who were also chronically ill or otherwise physically pre-disposed to dying. The number one co-morbidity? Obesity. In the light of that fact, let’s examine the math:

COVID19 Deaths per 1000 world rank                          Obesity per 1000 world rank

US                             #17                                                                             #13

S. Korea                  #130                                                                           #178

So, by the actual numbers South Korea, if anything, underperformed the United States. By the numbers they should have been well below #130 in deaths to be on par with the United States. 

Even had S. Korea been the model the official narrative claimed it was, there is another truth – very inconvenient to Gibney – concerning S. Korea’s protocols that Gibney buried out of sight and mind. We’ll examine that once some context is established.

Gibney promoted the film as being produced “in secret” implying for fear of what the tyrannical Trump administration might do to him and his talent. He pulls this stunt notwithstanding the fact Gibney’s chosen Democrat party regime has visited unprecedented hell upon whistleblowers in contrast to Trump’s administration. As we will demonstrate in a subsequent post, Gibney himself has enjoyed dishing out some of that hell on whistleblowers. Gibney had used the “fear” technique before with the Scientologists and others – smearing them in an effort to glorify himself as a dashing, heroic figure.  In that vein, he also dramatized the ferocious threat COVID 19 was to himself. He conducted each interview in a hermetically sealed half of a room.  He and camera were on one side of a giant wall to wall and floor to ceiling clear tarp and the interview subject comically sat alone in the entire other half of the room looking at the camera lens peeking through at him. 

Gibney’s Scientology hit piece featured as consultant and talent the man who had been in a position within Scientology that was responsible for virtually everything Gibney’s Scientology movie complained about. Yet, Gibney invited the perp to run off at the mouth about the activities of others. In both films Gibney chose obvious sociopathic narcissists as heroes. TUC’s headliner was none other than the man more responsible for the United States Government’s response to COVID-19 than even the sinister Dr. Fauci (see Big Brother’s Storyteller). That would be Rick Bright the head of Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, within the Department of Health and Human Services.  BARDA was literally created to take charge of the handling of such a pandemic. The greater part of Bright’s career (financed by U.S. taxpayer dollars) was supposed to be readying him to take charge of such an event.

Remarkably, Gibney paints Bright as the victim of the Trump administration, blaming virtually every one of BARDAs failures on anyone but the head of BARDA. In meticulously doing so, Gibney winds up indicting and convicting Bright of High Treason, and for committing the single greatest crime against Americans during the pandemic. The film was rushed to completion to act as an October surprise against Trump during the 2020 election (released on October 13, 2020 – to immediate, slavish widespread mainstream media acclaim). So, Gibney (and the mainstream media who promoted him) had no idea that his apologia to Bright would ultimately serve as his bill of indictment. That is because Bright’s alleged heroism only later was proven to be supreme cowardice hidden behind supreme arrogance.

Bright, alone in his hermetically sealed room, comes off like a smirking, arrogant smart aleck. 

Gibney begins by asking Bright about hydroxychloroquine. Bright chortles and cracks that he wishes he had never heard the term. Gibney then devotes a large part of the film denigrating Trump for having promoted hydroxychloroquine as a valid COVID-19 treatment. Gibney preached the media’s deep-state talking points. That is, any potential treatments for COVID (which might detract from marketability of a trillion-dollar vaccine) is ‘quackery’, ‘anti-science’, maybe even, God forbid, ‘Russian.’ 

Bright details how he “outsmarted” Trump administration orders to recommend and make hydroxychloroquine widely available. He rushed through an Emergency Use Order that allowed for use of hydroxychloroquine so as to appear compliant. But, Bright snuck into the Order limitations that would make the Order effectively useless. He added into the hydroxychloroquine recommendation that it could ONLY be used for those who had already been hospitalized. By doing so he limited use of the drug to those for whom it was too late to save and heal, denying a proven cure and perhaps life to millions of people. Bright smirks with delight at having pulled off such a passive-aggressive move of sabotage dressed up as compliance.

Gibney’s and mainstream media’s condemnation of hydroxychloroquine was not simply a side effect of their Trump Derangement Syndrome.  Big Pharma and their inside man Anthony Fauci were systematically condemning any effective existing treatments for COVID-19 for a greed-driven motive. If it were acknowledged that there were effective existing treatments, that would preclude their ability to create an Emergency Use Authorization for an untested, experimental, trillion-dollar, profit-inducing Big Pharma vaccine. 

To fully appreciate the magnitude of Bright’s crime (clearly backed by Anthony Faucci and his Big Pharma bosses) look no further than the title of one of the first hydroxychloroquine studies that managed to cut through the Big Pharma controlled medical publishing industry embargo and get published:

Hydroxychloroquine is effective, and consistently so when provided early, for COVID-19: a systematic review 

The study, a compilation of many trials of hydroxychloroquine, is not difficult to follow and can be found here, Hydroxychloroquine Study.  Its conclusion is unequivocal:

Conclusions

HCQ has been shown to have consistent clinical efficacy for COVID-19 when it is provided early in the outpatient setting; in general, it appears to work better the earlier it is provided. Overall, HCQ is effective against COVID-19. There is no credible evidence that HCQ results in worsening of COVID-19. HCQ has also been shown to be safe for the treatment of COVID-19 when responsibly used.

The operative words being “when provided early”.  The Bright, Fauci authorization order mandated the precise opposite, use only after hospitalization. Gibney glorified this atrocity against humanity in dramatic fashion, making it the centerpiece of his film.

You can also get a more detailed breakdown of the Bright crime through viewing the following video (which includes quite a bit of  Bright footage from Gibney’s film). Be sure to watch it through to the end where Bright and Fauci are shown in Oct 2019 to be hoping for a COVID 19-like pandemic and a Big Pharma spokesperson talks about how wonderful the pandemic was for business after the fact.

Bright’s Treason Revealed video link

Which leads us right back to Gibney’s favorite country, South Korea. While Gibney beats the living hell out of President Trump for suggesting hydroxychloroquine, Gibney buries the fact that South Korea was of exactly the same mind as Trump. In fact South Koreans were already successfully utilizing hydroxychloroquine and hoped Trump’s words would increase that application as evidenced by the following:

1.

South Korea is using hydroxychloroquine successfully per Times of Israel

2.

South Korean experts recommend hydroxychloroquine and find Trump’s comments “encouraging’ per UPI

If in fact South Korea did outperform other countries, then why did Gibney not report the fact that South Korea embraced the use of hydroxychloroquine despite attempts by his heroes Bright and Fauci to slander it into disuse? Clearly, only because he couldn’t then put out a one-sided propaganda piece designed to cost Trump the 2020 election.

What is remarkable about TUC is the fanatical and frantic nature of Gibney’s race to get out an October surprise. He even appears to have stooped to the level of utilizing subliminal hypnotism against his audience. To open a segment roundly criticizing the Jared Kushner led effort to gather N95 face masks on the open market, Gibney states this wild claim:

“In February the Trump Administration actually created the China COVID Procurement Service to encourage U.S. producers like 3M to sell their entire inventories of N95 masks to China.”

Then, TUC spends twenty minutes highlighting some privileged, snot-nosed Kennedy scion whining about not having his hand held while participating in the White House led procurement effort. No one, not even the sniveling Kennedy, stooped to make or back up the claim Gibney made. Clearly, because Gibney made it up himself.  I invite anyone to research the claim. It exists nowhere but within the fertile, propagandist imagination of Alex Gibney.

Microsoft’s Artificial Intelligence chatbot (which is programmed to kill Trump at every opportunity) was so stumped by the question asking for confirmation of the claim, it invented the idea that the question had something to do with the upcoming election, and bowed out:

Sent by you:

Is the following true or false:  In 2020 the Trump administration actually created the China COVID Procurement service to encourage US producers like 3m to sell their entire inventories of n95 masks to china?

Copilot:

Sorry, elections are a super complex topic that I’m not trained to chat about. Is there something else I can help with?

Gibney soundly and repeatedly criticizes Trump for attempting to avoid shutdowns and lockdowns.  He lionizes the likes of Fauci and his minions at Centers for Disease Control for demanding them. Such would seem appropriate for a deep-state-sponsored election interfering, October surprise in late 2020. But, it did not age well. His boy Fauci has spent the better part of the past two years denying history, now claiming he never called for lockdowns.

Fauci lockdowns

The political hack nature of the propaganda piece is evidenced by approximately ½ of it being consumed by Obama health departments appointees smugly comparing the responses to several past flu outbreaks to COVID 19 and haughtily condemning Trump personally for the “failures” of the bureaucrats they themselves lead for 8 years and sometimes longer leading up to 2020. Gibney never points out the obvious flaw in their ‘reasoning’, COVID-19 was not the flu (and none of their outbreaks had DHHS demanding useless masking requirements, closing of schools, closing of businesses, banning of effective treatments, etc – all of which Trump was plagued with and then pressured with by deep-state owned and operated mainstream media). And more damning, COVID-19 was most likely engineered by the very DHHS lifers crew (lead by Fauci) to specifically resist human attempts to contain it. (See Big Brother’s Storyteller). Gibney of course omits that fact so that he can guffaw at Trump’s claim that “nobody has seen anything like this (COVID-19)”, with the sardonic comeback “nothing could be further from the truth”. That introduces Gibney’s claim that the 1918 Spanish flu outbreak response was all Trump needed to know about COVID-19, a claim to which the only appropriate response would be, “nothing could be further from the truth.” 

Gibney gives air to several political hacks criticizing Trump personally for CDC delays in getting operational testing kits distributed nationally.  Yet, not one single shred of evidence is introduced to demonstrate any delay was not the assigned responsibility of long-serving member of the DHHS, particularly Rick Bright and Anthony Fauci. Gibney gets so far out over his skis in pursuing Trump as a target – and bagging him before the 2020 election – he makes the following remarkable claim, in his own voice:

“Ignoring expert advice became an act of patriotism in the Trump White House…Where even the push for a new vaccine was done with a reckless disregard for science.”

May be hard to recall now, but Trump’s Operation Warp Speed to create an effective vaccine was fair game for the Democrats leading up to the 2020 election, under the moral standard that anything Trump is bad and anything anti-Trump is good.  In fact, even Kamala Harris expressed “vaccine hesitancy” if it were connected with Trump.  

Now try to recall several days after the 2020 election.  With the declaration of Biden’s win and the snap of Big Brother’s fingers, the entire Democrat party structure and the entire mainstream media turned on a dime.  So much so, by the time Biden took office his administration was pushing mandatory jabs of Trump’s vaccine. Yeah, the one Gibney called the result of a “reckless disregard for science.”

Postscript:  The hero (really villain) of the piece, Rick Bright was rewarded with a high paying position at the Rockefeller Foundation. His focus of late? Conning all nations of the world – including the US – to forfeit the Constitutional Rights of their citizens to the Globalist elite’s World Health Organization. In that way, next time they engineer a global pandemic you will be forced out of work, in doors, and be made to take whatever injections doctors Frankenstein decide is best for them and worst for you. 

Comments Off on Big Brother Storyteller II

Posted in Uncategorized

Free Speech Banned in Brazil

Posted on August 31, 2024 by | Comments Off on Free Speech Banned in Brazil

We warned of this happening on April 7th, Breaking News Brazil. It has now come to pass. The last major international free speech forum X has been banned by the Brazilian government. As noted earlier this is part of a larger effort by the US foreign policy apparatus to tip over free speech countries like dominos to ultimately justify toppling free speech in the United States of America. For a rundown on how this development and others around the globe are aimed at putting Elon Musk under the thumb of the deep US state censorship apparatus, see Mike Benz lay it out on Tucker Carlson Network, Mike Benz on TCN. (If you are short on time, skip to the section “will they take out Elon Musk next” at approximately 1:50:30 on time counter). Here is a rundown on what Benz recommends Congress to force the administration to do about the latest in Brazil, Benz on Brazil.

Comments Off on Free Speech Banned in Brazil

Posted in Uncategorized

This Week 8.16.24

Posted on August 16, 2024 by | Comments Off on This Week 8.16.24

Another huge week for the government-sponsored Censorhip/Propaganda Industrial Complex.

Mind Control through Propaganda:

State controlled media magically turns “progressive” leftist Walz into lifelong centrist:

Mind Control through propaganda and smearing:

State controlled media makes created (fake) centrist Walz normal and smears his counterpoint as ‘weird’ (note the same words repeated over and over – as was done in the Soviet Union and in hypnotism:

State controlled media rolls out literal campaign for the leftist candidates in perhaps the most cringe-worthy service to its masters ever recorded. “Joy” was the word that miraculously came to the minds of every single mainstream media member at the instant:

Even the comedian retained by the state to amplify its steady stream of fake news has to concede that even his state controlled loving audience knows mainstream media is a sick joke:

The international Fact Checking Network at the Poynter Institute (see several previous posts on this politburo outfit) is now being fact checked by X:

Jonathon Turley exposes the fact that we are on the verge of losing the right to freedoms of thought and speech:

A Harris-Walz administration would be a nightmare for free speech

Meanwhile, the UK government is setting the groundwork by criminalizing Prayer/thought:

While it lets rapists run wild if they are  of privileged racial/immigration classes, creating a 2 tiered justice system designed to suppress native Brits:

The EU Commission got in on the act, attempting to censor Elon Musk and Donald Trump, directly attempting to interfere in US elections:

Did the US government flip out about this incursion like they did when the CIA falsely accused Russia of interfering in the 2016 election?  Hell no, it was thundering silence. For the simple reason that all EU censorship initiatives are being organized and instigated by US government agencies and front groups. More on that to come. 

Comments Off on This Week 8.16.24

Posted in Uncategorized

This Week – 8.9.24

Posted on August 9, 2024 by | Comments Off on This Week – 8.9.24

Realize, the following represents just seven days of Big Brother’s seemingly inexorable march toward turning humans into embryonic, Matrix-like cocoons. And you are spending your time bitching about what?

In the UK, the government is cracking down on anyone whom they determine is communicating anything which the government might determine engenders “hate.”

Of course, there is no definition nor standard whatsoever issued for what might constitute “hate” provocation, nor is there any disclosure as to whom might consider whatever is uttered is hateful. Of course, the context of this crackdown is: British natives have been counter protesting against Islamic immigrant protests which have included violence against British natives. So the British government wants the counter protestors to know that if they upset the Islamic protestors, they are going straight to jail, without passing “go.”

The government is warning you that even if you send something to a friend to “warn” he or she about imminent danger to themselves, you might wind up getting arrested:

The Brits are going so far as campaigning for the taking over of the world’s last major online forum that recognizes freedom of speech:

Couldn’t happen here in the good ole US of A? Think again. Here is the media’s newly anointed next Vice President, letting you know it is indeed coming to America:

So same vague, undefined “hate” speech? Plus, “misinformation”? Well, look how well your government has handled that standard:

Think uncle Tim wouldn’t come after you like the federal government did during COVID? Think again, he’s already mandated family members to narc out one another for questioning PROVEN DESTRUCTIVE government health restrictions:

This week we also learned that former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (and current military reserve member) was put on the terror watch list by the Biden Administration. She has been tailed by three federal marshals on each flight she takes, with serious violations of her 4th amendment rights at all airports she arrived at. The designation came within days of Gabbard appearing on national TV criticizing Kamala Harris. Recall Gabbard was credited with ending Harris’ 2020 presidential bid by disclosing her crimes as California prosecutor during a democrat party primary debate. Read the whole story here, Real Clear Politics.

And to top it off, while we’re all distracted with the Campaign Mind Swiping, Congress and the White House are busy on their continuing dismantling of the Constitution, See Jonathon Turley’s Decapitation of the Constitution.

Again, you were bitching about what?

Comments Off on This Week – 8.9.24

Posted in Uncategorized