Tag Archives: deep-state

The Proof That MK Ultra Mind Control Worked?

JOLLY WEST PART II

Before we examine Jolly West’s role in the cover up of the conspiracy that resulted in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, let’s finish some undone business.

We’ll begin with West’s bold claims to CIA MK Ultra boss Sydney Gottlieb made in his 1956  Studies of Dissociated States and Report on Research In Hypnosis. First, West includes in the former the definition of dissociated states “fugues, amnesias, somnambulisms, and multiple personalities.”  We’ll focus on fugues because as you can see it is the precise goal of the MK Ultra program (see The Deep State and Scientology, The CIA vs. L. Ron Hubbard).

Definition of fugue: 

“a disturbed state of consciousness in which the one affected seems to perform acts in full awareness but upon recovery cannot recollect the acts performed” – Merriam Webster dictionary

West goes on to state: “In fact, hypnosis may be considered to be a pure-culture, laboratory-controlled dissociative reaction. Of the entire phenomenology of the various states described above, there is not one single manifestation which cannot be produced experimentally in the hypnotic subject.”

(see attached, Studies of Dissociated States)

Further in West’s accompanying “Report on Research in Hypnosis” he reports (on page 7), with no caveats:

“Current experiments indicate that false memories may successfully be inserted and true memories removed in suitable subjects. In other words it has been found to be feasible to take the memory of a definite event in the life of an individual and, through hypnotic suggestion, bring about the subsequent conscious recall to the effect that this event never actually took place, but that a different (fictional) event actually did occur.” 

(see attached Report on Research in Hypnosis)

You might be wondering “if Jolly West put in writing to the head of CIA Clandestine Operations that the above MK ultra mind control techniques were proven ‘successfully’, where is the evidence of that capability?” That evidence is not in the document where the claim is made. It is not in the papers of Jolly West curated by UCLA. Nor is it with the CIA, unless they have it buried deep beneath the earth behind impenetrable barriers. The CIA to this day refuses to even acknowledge West was their boy, even though documentation of that being the case has been published far and wide.  

There must have been something to West’s claim, since as a result of the report, the CIA officially continued to fund West for another ten years (thirty years if you include the CIA fronts that funded subsequent West-led groups, such as American Family Foundation, AFF).

There may be a clue in the one and only event where documentation exists for what Jolly West actually did on this earth between the years 1954 and 1956.

Author Tom O’Neill was the first to discover the documents above and the incident we are about to explore. He covered it in some detail in his classic CHAOS: CHARLES MANSON, the CIA and the SECRET HISTORY OF THE SIXTIES, Little Brown 2019. Mr. O’Neill did not suggest that what follows may have served as West’s “proof” that MK Ultra worked. But, if one takes O’Neill’s extensive research, recounts it in chronological order, investigates and adds new relevant facts, an interesting picture emerges. It might suggest that this case fits the bill as the “proof” West relied upon in making the above sweeping claims of MK Ultra success (at least in the minds of West and Gottlieb, who arranged a least another decade of CIA funding because of West’s accomplishments).   

At the time of the incident concerned Jolly West was one year into his independent MK Ultra contractual relationship with the CIA. The event in focus concluded shortly (perhaps as soon as a day) before West announced “mission accomplished” to Gottlieb two years later. 

State of Texas vs. Jimmy Shaver

It was the bizarre matter of Jimmy Shaver. Very little was known about Shaver’s previous history other than he’d been divorced, had re-married, and had two kids. He was an airman at West’s Lackland Airforce base in San Antonio Texas. He was an instructor for dozens of men. He had no criminal record, no history of violence and was never considered mentally ill. He was, however, recommended for experimental treatment for migraine headaches at Lackland’ medical facility where the likes of West were experimenting. He fit two of Jolly West’s criterion for human guinea pig status: “airmen” and “patients” (see paragraph E “Subjects” of the attached page 3 of West’s June 11, 1953 proposal letter to MK Ultra Head Sidney Gottlieb.

On the night (early morning hours) of July 4, 1954 a three-year old girl was found raped and brutally murdered in a gravel pit near a tavern in San Antonio. According to the El Paso Herald-Post, the pit was located “just outside the wire fence of the Lackland Air Force Base.” (close to Jolyon West’s office and lab at the base). Shortly afterward Shaver emerged from the brush near the pit, sweating, breathing heavily, with scratches across his upper body. He was arrested. Witnesses said Shaver seemed “trancelike” and he asked “what is going on here?” as if he were genuinely in the dark. There was no indication Shaver had made any attempt to escape. Instead, he was wandering around in an apparent daze. He claimed to have no knowledge about the crime.

Through hours of interrogation at the local jail, Shaver maintained his innocence. Finally, mid-morning in apparent resignation he signed a confession. It only lasted for a few hours. In the afternoon, Shaver signed another confession that cancelled the first. In relevant part it stated, “If she was raped and she is dead then I must be responsible since I was the one who picked her up and put her in my car.” (Fort Worth Star-Telegram 30 Sept 1954). Quite the subjunctive case for ‘proof’ beyond a reasonable doubt. Significantly, O’Neill learned from a West associate that West had somehow inserted himself into the situation the very night of the murder, though the extent of his involvement was never disclosed.

Four days after the questionable confession Shaver told a reporter for the Austin American, “I guess I’m guilty, but I just can’t see me doing something like that…I’ve always been a religious man. I’ve always tried to be good. I don’t know what happened.”  Again, he asserted that he remembered nothing about the murder.  (Austin American article)

Shaver’s court-appointed attorneys moved the court to have Shaver declared insane and incapable of standing trial. The motion was tried before a jury. At first it seemed that Shaver’ motion would succeed. After all, according to the 22 Sept 1954 edition of the Brownsville Herald, “Three Air Force psychiatrists testified Shaver was insane at the time of the crime and is insane now.” 

But, the jury ruled Shaver was capable of standing trial. The Brownsville Herald reported on 24 Sept 1954 that when the jury read the verdict, Shaver’s mother Mrs. E. McGhee immediately had a heart attack and collapsed to the courtroom floor. (Brownsville Herald, attached)

With three military psychiatrists attesting to Shaver’s insanity, he still had a fighting chance in trial and on appeal.

Enter the Black Sorcerer’s apprentice, Dr. Louis Jolyon “Jolly” West. West took it upon himself all at once to a) become Jimmy’s doctor and treat him, b) forward his MK Ultra experimentation by plying Jimmy with drugs and hypnotism, and c) serve as the critical link on the defense team, the lead psychiatric expert witness in trial. A conflict of interest ridden mix that only an accomplished sociopath could orchestrate. 

West testified how through use of sodium amytal and hypnosis he had put Shaver into a hypnotic state. It was only in that artificially induced trance state that Shaver admitted to the crime. Realize, Shaver since the day after his possibly coerced, and subjunctive-laced confession never relented from the position that he had no recollection of the crime and was flummoxed by what had happened (until the day he died). Only his own psychiatrist, putatively testifying on his behalf, presented the evidence of admitted guilt required to send him to the electric chair. According to O’Neill who reviewed the original trial transcripts, “West argued that Shaver’s truth-serum confession was more valid than any other.” To add additional grounds for sentencing his patient/client to death, West testified that Jimmy Shaver though temporarily insane when he allegedly did the dirty deed, was now “sane.”   

In one go West managed to violate the Nuremburg Code against human experimentation, violate the Hippocratic Oath by harming his own patient (in fact having him sentenced to the death), violate doctor patient-privilege, and probably violate attorney work-product privilege. 

Any other medical professional who pulled such a stunt would promptly lose his license for life. He’d probably also be sued so royally as to have his wages garnished for the rest of his life to pay the judgement. Not so for favored and valued CIA contractors. They, like West, wind up living privileged and honorific-filled lives in exchange for such skullduggery.   

Tom O’Neill hunted down transcripts of West’s drug/hypnosis confession session. The passages he provided in CHAOS demonstrate West leading and encouraging Shaver to the point of possibly implanting the confession in Shaver’s head. Initially Shaver resisted.

Example:

West: “After you took her clothes off what did you do?”

Shaver: “I never did take her clothes off.”

The critical middle 1/3rd of the interview was not recorded – the period in which apparently Shaver’s resistance was worn down. The final segment begins with this narration: “Shaver is crying. He’s been confronted with all the facts repeatedly.” That Shaver caved to West’s suggested confession while under hypnosis and sodium amytal and repeated leading questions is no surprise today. That is because it is accepted science that both hypnosis and sodium amytal create extreme suggestibility, particularly when combined. But, further research found that Jolly West already knew that fact and worse about combining hypnosis with sodium amytal. Eight years earlier he wrote the following in his April 1948 paper “Hypnosis In psychotherapy”: “[Hersley] investigated nebutal, sodium amytal, and sodium pentothal, and believes the barbiturates act specifically on the hypothalamic region…he was able to establish good hypnotic rapport with 18 of 20 nurses, and produce hypnotic phenomena (catalepsy, hallucinations, hyperamnesia, etc.) in many.”  He must have remembered. After all, his first MK Ultra mentor Dr. William Donald Hastings of University of Minnesota sent this little note to his prize student in response that very paper:

But West concealed that fact from the court, instead passing off his implanted confession as “more valid than any other.” As the MK Ultra documents we’ve reviewed demonstrate West and his CIA bosses were never after the truth, but instead were intent on creating false memories, fugue states, and amnesia.

Did West program Shaver from the get-go to commit murder and forget it? Was Shaver an  MK Ultra experiment gone wrong that required implanting a confession to discredit and silence him? Did West simply bumble in and destroy Shaver’s defenses out of his signature brand of vanity mixed with incompetence?  We apparently can never know.

Leaving no stone unturned, O’Neill  investigated the “experimental treatments” that Shaver apparently received at the Lackland Air Force base medical facility. He requested the medical records for Jimmy Shaver. He was informed by Lackland that all medical records for 1954 were intact with one exception: those for last names beginning between “Sa” and St” went missing.

Whether programming a killer or implanting a confession, both would be employing the very means and ends West vowed in writing to his CIA boss Sydney Gottlieb to perform the year before. (see, Jolly West Part One)

Predictably, Shaver was found guilty and sentenced to death in the electric chair. Twice. He appealed the first verdict/sentence on a juror bias claim, won that appeal and was tried a second time. The day he was sentenced a second time to the electric chair sealed his fate forever. March 31, 1956.   

According to O’Neill’s best estimate, West’s triumphant “mission accomplished” claim (made in the undated documents referenced above) to Gottlieb was rendered in or about “April 1956.”

I am not claiming that West waited until the very month, perhaps even the very day, for Shaver’s fate to be sealed (dead men can’t tell tales) before claiming success at MK Ultra goals. But, looking at the sequence of things, one could come away with that impression.

While awaiting his fate on death row, Shaver was asked by an Associated Press reporter if he remembered anything on the night the little girl was killed. He said, “I just can’t recall a thing except that I remember riding in the back seat of the car.”  He seemed at ease, adding “I think it’s better for me to die for something that I didn’t do than to die for something I did. I don’t have blood on my hands and I praise God for that.” (Associated Press, published in Corpus Christi Caller Times)

Jimmy Shaver, of conscious mind (not in West’s drug and hypnosis induced trance state), insisted upon his innocence until his death by electrocution.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Revisited

Over the past year I have rung the warning bell about the dangers of complacency vis a vis the rise of Artificial Intelligence.  Examples:

Since then I have learned to work with available AI chatbots as a means to enhance investigation, research and discovery rather than to replace it.  I believe it is at that exact point where AI turns from a potential liability into an asset. When one reveres it as something worthy of replacing one’s own judgement and line of curiosity, ala the ‘superintelligence’ Mark Zuckerberg is presently pimping, one is headed for slavery.  On the other hand, if one uses its greatest features as a servant it can serve useful purposes. Those feature today are its unparalleled ability to rapidly and accurately sift through massive amounts of data, sort it and evaluate it without bias or emotion.

Emotion is a completely natural thing and not something to be avoided or suppressed.  Emotional intelligence is important for personal interactions and implementation of solutions when they have effects on people. There are exceptions, however. For example, when one is required to apply straight reasoning to come to a logical conclusion about the facts of a matter, emotion can and does alter truth.  Well-constructed AI platforms offer an incredible tool for a) sifting through mountains of data to find specific important facts (finding and separating signal from noise), and b) evaluating those facts without bias or emotion. 

While utilizing AI, some things have to be kept in mind and compensated for.  First, not all AI platforms are equal.  There are only two that I have found to be comprehensive, consistently accurate, and unbiased.  Those are X’s AI platform called “Grok”, and Chat GPT.  Caveat: over the past several months programming changes have been introduced by Grok to make it far more obedient to Establishment narratives (perhaps reflective of Musk’s recent taming by economic forces). The second concern is that even those platforms are held back by the data they must rely upon. That data in large part is dominated by the arrogance and politics/vested interests infected media, intelligentsia and academia (the generators of much of the current internet data banks). But, intelligently lead conversations can cut through a lot of that with appeal to Chat GPT’s logic, largely uninfected by bias and emotion. By contrast I have found Microsoft’s Copilot AI to be largely incapable of looking and “thinking” outside the Overton windows established by the Establishment.  Even worse is Google’s Gemini. It has so thoroughly programmed in political correctness and wokeness that its Artificial Intelligence is in truth a liability. 

Grok and Chat GPT may in fact represent a window of opportunity.  That window is open only so long as those AI platforms are not monetized. When they are they will be as defective, debilitated and destructive as Google search has now become. Google search has become a whoring tool of corporations to forward pavlovian consumerist behavior on the part of users.  It also enforces deep state, globalist political correctness and wokeness in exchange for protecting its monopoly on search.  For straight information, Google search is literally obsolete in the presence of Grok and Chat GPT.  But, beware. Corporatized Globalist interests (including Wall Street) are coming hard for Grok and Chat GPT.

During this window of opportunity I am using the most useable platforms to their fullest. I will add others as I find they meet the standards of Grok and Chat GPT, or others exceed them as they surrender to $. 

I have a long series of articles planned over the next several months. It will likely proceed something like this. Each week I’ll post a comprehensive story.  It will be followed by 2-3 receipts producers. That is, I will share some AI research – along with its factual citations – that backs up the article’s credibility and in some cases even expands on its theme. It is remarkable what you can learn when you explore topics with a super-informed entity without bias and emotion (something heretofore impossible in a media dominated environment). I think it will be eye-opening as we probe subjects that the Establishment (deep state, the media, and the Globalist-corporatists they serve) have long-since shut the Overton windows upon. Subjects upon which the media has implanted emotions and bias creating an atmosphere of fear and irrationality. Forbidden thought about subjects we’ve been conditioned to believe have long been settled. But, have they really been?

The Deep State and Scientology

In recent posts – Government Censors Are Losing Their Minds and Elon Musk and the USSA – we described how prominent US citizens have been transformed from corporate media darlings to heinous villains instantly. All they had to do initially was publicly object to deep-state censorship strong arm tactics and begin to peek behind the deep state curtain of Oz.  

This deep state is the creation of and the protector of the American plutocracy. Over the past ten years more concentrated effort has been put into creating an all-powerful plutocratic ruling class than in any other ten-year period in American history.  The new unconstitutional 4th branch of government (the sprawling, permanent bureaucracy or deep state) has actively enforced an unprecedented transfer of wealth from the many to the few. In no commensurate period has income inequality increased so rapidly; have censorship measures been more prevalent; has state propaganda been so dutifully churned out by corporate media; has government control and regulation of powerful corporations (including but not limited to media) been so complete; has the entire justice apparatus been used to hunt down, prosecute and persecute populists designated as domestic enemies of the state. Unfortunately for the younger generations, the level of neo mania (all that matters is the now, modern, and unthinking) is so great they have no frame of reference to even notice such fundamental, repressive changes.

Because of the populist landslide results of the 2024 Presidential election we are likely to learn that all of the maladies above – those indicia of the unquestioned plutocrat hegemony being visited upon us – are not new. Such efforts at smashing the Bill of Rights have been part of the ‘deep state’ agenda for many decades. This could soon become more clear, even if only by Trump’s promised release of the JFK, RFK, and MLK assassination files. The long duration of this erosion of rights is not understood by many. That in part is due to the neo-maniacal trend in this society. That is all attention by the plutocracy is driven to the present and ever-present future “threats”; the idea being to keep people distracted and unaware of the gradual erosion of their rights. In order to overcome the Orwellian neo-maniacal erasure of history from the collective consciousness, some study of history is in order. 

One history I am intimately familiar with is that of the relationship between the church of Scientology and the US deep-security state. It so happens that that history provides a helpful backdrop against which to better appreciate the recent Bill of Rights cancellation craze in America. Virtually all tactics we are witnessing of late have been applied with force and passion against Scientology for several decades.

Scientology’s founder L. Ron Hubbard came into American consciousness in 1950 with his bestselling book Dianetics; The Modern Science of Mental Health. It was a handbook for regular people to straighten out their own minds and lives through a prescribed self-help regimen. Prior to Dianetics, regression type therapy (that is, resolving one’s past through revisiting it) was practiced mainly under the auspices of the government (to wit, WW II PTSD cases) and almost always with the ‘aid’ of mind-altering drugs. Hubbard introduced the idea of freeing the mind without the use of drugs, which he viewed as exacerbating the conditions meant to be relieved. He was immediately set upon by the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, The American Psychological Association, The Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Association, the Food and Drug Administration and virtually every federal law enforcement and intelligence agency. It took several decades of liberal use of Freedom of Information laws and coast to coast litigation in order to a) survive the attacks and b) learn of its extraordinary extent and intensity.

Paradoxically, the hundreds of thousands of subsequently revealed documents were really unnecessary to understanding why Ron Hubbard seemed to pose such an earth-shaking threat to the keepers of America’s deepest, dark secrets.  Instead, a short passage in Hubbard’s second major book on the mind told one all he needed to know about why the deep, security state mustered all its forces against him.

In 1951 Hubbard’s Science of Survival: The Prediction of Human Behavior hit the market. The book expanded on Dianetics counselling techniques and provided a manual for predicting human behavior. In the course of doing so, Hubbard revealed something that – in spite of his efforts – the world at large would remain ignorant of for more than two decades.  

The offending passage:

There is another form of hypnotism which falls between the surgical operation and straight hypnotism without physical pain. This form of hypnotism has been a carefully guarded secret of certain military and intelligence organizations. It is a vicious war weapon and may be of considerable more use in conquering a society than the atom bomb. This is no exaggeration. The extensiveness of the use of this form of hypnotism in espionage work is so wide today that it is long past the time when people should have become alarmed about it. 

It required Dianetic processing to uncover “pain-drug-hypnosis.”  Otherwise pain-drug-hypnosis was out of sight, unsuspected and unknown.

Hubbard claimed that agents of the agencies so exposed made attempts on his life later in 1951.  Their methods of course made proving such impossible. And the public brushed it off since the leading lights of American corporate media (including Time Magazine, the New York Times and CBS) went to extraordinary lengths at the behest of their deep-security state masters attempting to paint Hubbard in as unfavorable a light as possible.

In fact, it was not until the mid-1970s that Pain-drug-hypnosis (PDH) received any significant attention. That was when Senator Frank Church’s Intelligence Oversight Congressional Committee probed the dirty work of the CIA. That committee (and subsequent Congressional investigations) released documents and testimony proving that what L. Ron Hubbard stated as fact in 1951 was indeed irrefutable fact. The Church committee revealed that at the time (1951) of Hubbard’s revelations US Naval Intelligence and the CIA had been working for at least eight years on enhancing interrogation and torture techniques with drugs and hypnosis. In the early 50’s the CIA formally took the lead in all such operations under the rubric MK (Mind Control) Ultra.  1952 documents labelled Project Bluebird, a part of MK Ultra, spelled out the aims of their then ongoing experimentation with PDH:

“Can we obtain control of the future activities (physical and mental) of any given individual, willing or unwilling by application of SI (sensory isolation) and H (hypnosis) techniques?”

“Can we in a matter of an hour, two hours, one day, etc., induce an H (hypnotic) condition in an unwilling subject to such an extent that he will perform an act for our benefit? (long range)”

“Can we create by post-H (hypnotic) suggestion an action contrary to an individual’s basic moral principals?” 

“Can we devise a system for making unwilling subjects into willing agents and then transfer that control to untrained agency agents in the field by use of codes or identifying signs or credentials?”

“Can we obtain control of the future activities (physical and mental) of any individual, willing or unwilling with a guarantee of amnesia?”

“Can an individual be made to perform an act of attempted assassination?”

And finally, for some comedic relief, the CIA asked a question indicating their Keystone Kops level of incompetence:

“Can we detect SI and H by use of SI an H (regression)?”

Link to original CIA document

As noted above L. Ron Hubbard had already been regularly ‘detecting’ SI and H (or pdh) through the decidedly drug and hypnosis free Dianetics. He’d even published the fact in a widely distributed book – and their own agency along with several others were pursuing Hubbard with considerable resources and ardor for having done so. I personally have so detected and uncovered SI and H (and PDH) application – along with relieving the damage originally done – by use of Dianetics and Scientology techniques. 

Hubbard’s 1951 revelation would make him and his creation Scientology a “national security risk”, a priority target for discrediting and destruction by the government-friendly corporate media and numerous federal agencies.

While having some measure of success in getting the public to disbelieve such claims, they failed to stop Hubbard and his techniques. He and Scientology became long-terms targets of what we today call a “whole of society” approach to undermining Hubbard and his work. That is numerous federal agencies set out to frame and prosecute Hubbard and Scientology by any means necessary, all flanked by coordinating smears by corporate media and non-governmental organizations such as the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Association, and the American Medical Association. Having been a front-line defender against such techniques for years, I too was targeted by a US Department of Justice FBI sting operation. When confronted with Freedom of Information Act documents proving the attempted frame up, the FBI agent in charge sheepishly admitted, “we tried our best, but you didn’t take the bait.”

The anti-Hubbard/Scientology propaganda campaign required authoritative figures to provide the ‘proof’ of their smears. Who were the leading lights utilized to smash Hubbard and Scientology? The heads of the American Psychiatric Association and the World Psychiatric Association. They and their minions presented themselves as the preeminent experts on ‘Mind Control”.  They testified publicly in the media, legally in courts and parliaments, doing everything possible to make Hubbard appear disreputable and to position Scientology as a “cult.” Their expertise was accepted and forwarded by literally every corporate media outlet and every intelligence and law enforcement agency in the western world. For forty years.

After all these decades later, after much smoke has cleared, after many relevant characters have long since passed and their papers became available, and tomes of classified government files have lost their classified status, let’s revisit who the authorities on Mind Control Cults  – and the basis of their authority – were. In short, they were the epitome of the APA affliction known as “projection” (that is accusing others of your own sordid intentions and actions). 

Dr. Winfred Overholser was the first ‘authority’ to strike out at Hubbard. Overholser was President of the APA 1947-48.  Decades of research were required to finally prove that from 1949 through the early fifties, L. Ron Hubbard and his Dianetics presented a clear and present danger to Overholser personally. Just after Overholser’s stint as APA President Hubbard presented Dianetics to a group of psychiatrists at the Overholser-led Washington D.C.  St Elizabeth Hospital. Hospital psychiatrists there eagerly adopted Dianetics methods as they experienced initial success. That was only until Overholser caught wind of it. He prohibited its use and denounced Hubbard and his techniques as a “fraud.”  That would be its original, official branding. Why was Oversholser so intolerant in the face of his underlings’ successes? Decades later it was learned that throughout the forties and fifties Oversholser was experimenting on unwitting patient-victims with LSD, electroshock treatment and hypnosis (yes, PDH) at St Elizabeth’s. Oversholser was one of the founding CIA shock/torture doctors furthering Mind Control experiments in America; the same line of experiments begun in Nazi Germany under the infamous Dr. Joseph Mengele. 

Dr. Ewen Cameron was an Overholser successor as  President of the American Psychiatric Association during the critical years 1952-1953, a year after Hubbard published his expose on government Pain-Drug-Hypnosis practices. They were also the same years the CIA formalized years of such practices under the rubric MK Ultra (Mind Control Ultra); the program quoted from above. Those were also the years when the APA became the lead grand inquisitor against Hubbard and Scientology, a duty it carried out for another 30 years, until the APA’s condemnation became more like a badge of honor as far as decent people were concerned. Cameron was also the head of the World Psychiatric Association from 1961-67, the years it worked hand-in-glove with the CIA to instigate attempted bannings of Scientology internationally, from the U.K. to Australia.

 What we learned from the 70s (from the Church Committee, and subsequent committee, hearings) to the present is that Cameron was a leading MK Ultra experimenter throughout the 1950’s and 1960’s.  He was in direct communication with MK Ultra’s American Mengele, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, poisoner and torturer in Chief of the CIA.  The most thorough treatment on the sinister nature of the mass tortures Cameron personally performed and directed can be found in Naomi Klein’s best-selling book The Shock Doctrine (2007, Knopf Canada). After exhaustive research from extensive Freedom of Information Act releases over thirty years, Ms. Klein demonstrated with ample fact references that while Cameron’s organization was condemning Hubbard and Scientology for alleged “mind control” Cameron himself was regularly drugging, poisoning, electroshocking, erasing the memories of, planting false memories in, and implanting commands into the brains of hundreds of unwitting human guinea pigs. Cameron’s victims were drugged beyond consciousness without their consent and then tortured and hypnotized, some for months on end. All hidden behind the cloak of the literal head of national and international institutions responsible for the betterment of human mental health. That is what made him an “expert” on Mind Control.

This is only the beginning of a story that would defy belief for many decades – until sufficient documentation could finally be obtained to prove it. Hopefully, it gives you some context from which to process the mind-numbing attacks, nullifications, brandings, and targeting being meted out by the deep state/corporate media cartel of late (witness Trump, Musk, Patel, RFK Jr, Tulsi Gabbard, to name a few).  There is more TO THE SCIENTOLOGY STORY. And at least one of the central characters makes Overholser and Cameron look like choir boys by comparison.