Tag Archives: margaret-singer

CIA MK Ultra Cult Methods – The Game

Reference: History of Mind Control in America

On August 26, 1957, an unemployed recovering alcoholic named Charles (Chuck) Dederich showed up to the University of California at Los Angeles Psychiatric department to volunteer himself as a human guinea pig. Dr. Keith Ditman’s experimental LSD program was funded by the federal government and as such was considered a CIA MK Ultra spin-off. Ditman would later answer directly to the dean of the CIA MK Ultra doctors, Lois Jolyon “Jolly” West when the latter took over the UCLA neuropsychiatric department that was eventually named after him. 

While under West at UCLA, Ditman testified on behalf of Charle Manson’s co-conspirators in the famous 1969 Tate-LaBianca murder trial (see Manson, Manson II).  According to the Manson prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi, Ditman testified “that a person using LSD is more susceptible to the influence of a second party, and that Leslie’s (a Manson co-conspirator) use of the drug, plus Manson’s influence over her, could have been significant factors in causing her to participate in a homicide.” (Helter Skelter) This of course was consistent with Ditman’s boss West’s claims that he had personally created the aims of the CIA MK Ultra program, essentially circumventing the will of another person. (see Jolly West Part I, and Jolly West Part II). That included wiping out any memory of the person being programmed to kill or do otherwise in the first place.

It is significant that Ditman supervised the administration of LSD to Chuck Dederich because the only record of the latter’s experience is the later spoken words of Dederich himself. He said, “through a crazy bunch of circumstances, I got a jolt of LSD over at UCLA. I took this under an experimental program…On that date, I became a different person, really and truly.”  And that is the totality of Dederich’s explanation for his alleged invention of a drug rehabilitation technique that became extraordinarily famous and controversial.  It was called Synanon. Dederich said, “Everything that has happened to me since, Synanon, everything, dates from that point (UCLA LSD trip of August 26, 1957).” (see, Charles Dederich Oral History, UCLA Library

The fundamental technique that Dederich called Synanon was a group attack/encounter session called “The Game.”  Dederich asserted, “The Game began with an idea I had of getting people together in a room to pursue a conversation with a ‘line of no line.’ … Boy I felt great, and everyone else loved it too. The next week they all came back. That was the birth of the Synanon Game, which basically hasn’t changed at all since 1958.” (Synanon papers, UCLA Special Collections).

The Game

The game is a confrontational session where an individual is torn down mentally by his group. The person facing the others would be taken down a notch, or several, psychologically. With no rules or precautions in place, the individual was fair game for hazing of the most personal and degrading nature. It was intended to break down the individual’s ego and reduce his or her sense of self. In the end, a new personality was formed – fundamentally altered by the group that tore down the personality in the first place.

Similar, less extreme techniques are used in any highly disciplined group such as the Marine Corps, competitive sports teams, even businesses where cooperation and teamwork are highly valued. But generally, they stop at the first sign that selfish, entitled behavior is apparently eschewed by the “offending” group member. The Game was different. It was uncontrolled and savage. It resulted in damaged people unquestioningly carrying out the demands of Dederich. It resulted in people severing all worldly contact and withdrawing into a cult. In fact, within a few years, Synanon was no longer in the drug rehab business, but instead became an isolated tribe of its own. Its fundamental methodology, the Game, was almost a perfect replication of what the CIA MK Ultra psychiatrists were a) claiming the Chinese/Korean Communists were utilizing on US POWs to control their minds, and b) attempting to replicate and improve for their own mind control programs.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the CIA’s Time/Life adjunct Henry Luce heavily embraced Dederich with cult-like devotion, honoring him with multi page promotional pieces. This 13-page spread made Synanon runner up only to the celebration of John Glenn’s first human orbit of earth, see LIFE magazine.

Dederich’s celebrity would ultimately wane as “The Game” became positioned with brainwashing. Synanon would spiral from drug rehab marvel to primitive, tribal, and violent cult. Nonetheless, the psychiatric profession continued to promote Synanon’s ways. Offshoots were studied and practiced on prison populations funded by the government. This framework overlapped with Dr. Edgar Schein’s mind control work. Schein was a paid MK Ultra colleague of Jolly West, Robert Lifton, Martin Orne, and Margaret Singer (whom he co-authored a book with) who experimented with mind control under the aegis of “studying Communist methods.” (see Edgar Schein LSD MK Ultra). Schein was credited with redefining “brainwashing” with the more academic term “coercive persuasion.” It was an apt term for CIA MK research. Naomi Klien established in her book The Shock Doctrine that in spite of all the yammering about “interrogation research” the CIA experiments and practice were always in fact geared toward torture techniques to change (control) the minds of subjects.

In 1968, Dr. Martin Groder established a federally funded mind control experimental program utilizing the Game model and Schein’s work at the Federal Correctional Institute at Marion, Illinois. The prison was built in 1963 as a maximum-security replacement for Alcatraz. Groder coined yet another term, Asklepieion (the Greek temple of healing), to carry on the coercive persuasion by ego/personality destruction and replacement.

So effective were the new Game techniques in controlling and changing minds, the prison system transferred scores of ideological ‘troublemakers’ from around the country to have their brains washed of unorthodox ideas. For example, the editor of Black Pride news Ed Johnson (aka Akinsiju Ola), the president of radical group New Africa Imari Obadele, Chicano militant Alberto Mares, prison lawyer Lanier “Red” Ramer, and Black Panther Eddie Sanchez. According to then-Associate Warden Fred Frey “We are a dumping ground. There’s no denying that. We get all the adjustment problems in the federal prison system.” (Southeast Missourian, April 25, 1974). Coercive persuasion was used to secure participation of those minds the MK Ultra doctors were assigned to control and redirect. While some with long sentences were promised routes to earlier release, others were threatened with or subjected to solitary confinement (the acknowledged worst form of human torture) until they acquiesced to play the Game.  

The goal was to break down the “convict identity” and antisocial/character-disordered patterns, then rebuild a more “prosocial” self. Sessions used confrontation to “unfreeze” old beliefs and self-concepts, induce change, and “refreeze” new ones. All of this work was a natural offshoot of the 1950’s primary CIA MK Ultra work. A comparison to MK Ultra’s least regulated and more extreme early techniques illustrates. Dr. Ewen Cameron of Canada’s McGill University (a World Psychiatric Association president, see The Deep State and Scientology) executed this “research” with what he termed “psychic driving.”  He subjected victims to months of electric shocks and coma inducing drugs. At first, it was accompanied with prerecorded continuous playback loops commanding the victims to forget their past. Then having wiped out the memory, ego/personality, to nothing, Cameron sought to reconstruct the individual mind with months of prerecorded new messages to the comatose patient. Needless to say, the experiments wound up with deeply damaged people, both physically and psychologically. Lawsuits abounded and nearly sunk the MK Ultra program altogether. Undaunted, the MK program marched forward using less controversial methods to bring about the same coercive results. The Game was modelled on the same psychic-driving principle.

The later Schein/Groder Game techniques applied the same principles as Cameron’s psychic driving in an aggressive group confrontation context. A 2024 Cambridge University Press paper explained how the MK Ultra doctors who originally studied Korean/Chinese Communist “brainwashing” turned around and applied the same processes to Americans they wanted to perform thought reform on: “In April 1961, Edgar Schein presented his CIA-funded “brainwashing research” at a conference for the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). At the event, titled The Power to Change Behavior, Schein hoped to promote coercive reformation as something genuinely therapeutic. He tried to disabuse his audience from popular fictions surrounding the brainwashing concept. Whether in Maoist China or the United States, he explained, coercive reform programs in both nations applied systematic social pressures, nudging deviants to unlearn antisocial personality traits through a process of mimicking and eventually internalizing prosocial behaviors, attitudes, and beliefs. When communists used these methods Americans called it “brainwashing,” but to Schein and other social scientists the electric hype around that label caused a serious problem.” (see, Cambridge Press paper by Mark M. Chatfield) Ironically, this publication overall seems to regret that confrontational Game programs were taken out by an epidemic of civil rights violations complaints. Still, the paper is chock-full of pertinent facts supporting our narrative.

The later prison “treatments” at Marion and other facilities, were described by Black Panther (and former Marion inmate) Eddie Griffin: ““In ‘game sessions’ members of the group accuse a person of playing games, not being truthful with the group, lying, and so forth, or the person is accused of some misdeed or shortcoming. Before he is allowed a chance to explain (which is considered only as more lying), he is relentlessly barraged by dirty name calling until he confesses or ‘owns up’ to his shortcomings. He is then accused of making the group go through a lot of trouble in having to pry the truth out of him. So, for this crime, he is forced to apologize. ‘Marathons’ are all night versions of literally the same, except that they include local community people who come into the prison to be ‘trained’ in the techniques. After so many hours of being verbally attacked and denied sleep, a person ‘owns up’ to anything and accepts everything he is told. After being humiliated, he is encouraged to cry. The group then shows its compassion by hugging him and telling him that they love him. These techniques exploit the basic weaknesses in human (aggregative) nature, especially those weaknesses produced by an alienating society, i.e. the need to be loved, accepted by other people, and the need to be free.”

The programs ultimately were implemented in ten different state prison projects across the country.

 Unsurprisingly, the Schein/Groder experiments were heavily criticized as coercive thought control, targeting political “troublemakers” (including Black Muslims and other activists), and was discontinued amid lawsuits and congressional scrutiny around the mid-seventies. The CIA had to look for other venues with which to continue the coercive persuasion experimentation and practice. During the late seventies and through the eighties The Game was applied to juvenile delinquents. It was hailed and officially supported in the states of Florida and Utah for years until lawsuits alleging violations of constitutional rights and mind damaging practices broke the activity. Some have pointed to the timing of Jim Jones’ transfer of People’s Temple to the Guyana jungle was another form of mind control experiment venue change. After all, The Game was the central control practice of Jones’ People’s Temple, under the heading “Catharsis.” 

How all this ties to our narrative was touched on in the Cambridge Press study where all of the groups we have covered thus far are listed together as related:

“The brainwashing scare retained its communist associations, but the meaning of the term shifted with concerns about scientific advancements in behavior modification, government interest in mind control technologies, and concerns about “brainwashing” in violent cults. In the Vietnam era, concerns grew around the American military’s use of psychological torture in counterintelligence interrogations, and antipsychiatry activists slandered Skinnerian methods of behaviorism as sinister. Shocking events such as the Manson family murders, Patty Hearst’s kidnapping and conversion to the Symbionese Liberation Army, and Jim Jones’s orchestrated mass suicides and murders at the People’s Temple compound in Guyana also heightened popular concerns about “brainwashing.” The nature of the threat increasingly symbolized the consequences of pathological individuals and government groups that abused their power by infringing [on] human or constitutional rights. Since the 1970s, instead of something that communists might do to Americans, brainwashing symbolized something that deranged Americans did to unsuspecting victims or enemies.”  Still, the study and public at large seemed to overlook the facts we have presented to date: to wit, the consistent Military Industrial Intelligence Complex connections to each of these groups.

Jolly West’s UCLA continued to support Synanon in myriad ways throughout the sixties and into the seventies. At least two professors repeatedly advocated on Synanon’s behalf before state agencies running into conflicts with the group. It also supported Dederich’s expansion into the US prison system. Perhaps not coincidentally, one of those prisons was the Federal Correctional Institute at Terminal Island (Los Angeles) at the time Charles Manson was doing imprisoned there.

As of the mid-seventies Jolly West himself (then head of the UCLA Neuropsychiatric Department) was receiving and organizing literature from colleagues he respected and worked with in the “anti-cult” profession that singled out Synanon and the Game as positive societal forces. Those files include a treatise by West’s (and his partner Margaret Singer of Berkley) mind control and anti-cult colleague, Berkley Sociologist Richard Ofshe. He authored Chapter Six Synanon: The People Business in the 1976 University of California press volume The New Religious Consciousness. Ofshe claimed to have spent an entire year as a “participant-observer at Synanon.”  He gave this glowing testimonial:

“The philosophical principles on which Synanon’s value system is based rest on traditional American notions of individual responsibility for action, the idea of finding within oneself the strength to control one’s life, and the faith that one can, in some mystical way, look within oneself and know what is right…

“It seems to me that the core of Synanon’s therapeutic system is precisely the fact that absolute demands are made on the individual. In considering Synanon’s authoritarianism we must not lose sight of the substance of what is demanded. The demands are, in the main, for adherence to the highest principles of honesty, rejection of behavior regarded as undesirable by those undergoing change and by the society in general, and pursuit of perfection…

“Insofar as the system is successful, it results in persons who modify their observable behavior in socially acceptable ways and come to believe that they are in control of their actions and able to govern themselves.” (Ofshe chapter of the New Religious Consciousness, source: Jolly West Special Collections, UCLA libary)

Notwithstanding the unusual support and encouragement from the Federal Bureau of Prisons, UCLA, and the most influential American mainstream media, Dederich and Synanon leadership regressed into alcoholism, created a secretive and physically abusive cult, and by the late seventies had for all intents and purposes folded. It did not go out in spectacular fashion like its CIA cult brethren the Manson Family, the Symbionese Liberation Army and Jim Jones’ Peoples Temple. Instead, it disintegrated like the other intelligence cult that used its coercive persuasion Game methods to control its members, the Unification Church of Sun Myung Moon.  The Manson families practiced the Game under the rubric “Charlie’s Rap.”  Same ego/personality destruction-reconstruction method as the Game, different name. The Moon Group’s version was called Public Confession. Same technique, different name.  Jim Jones’ Peoples Temple called their version of the Game, “Catharsis.” Identical method, different name. The Symbionese Liberation Army was perhaps most honest, calling their version of the Game “Maoist self-criticism and re-education.”

All of the CIA related cults examined in this series used the group confrontation personality destruction and reconstruction methodology that CIA MK Ultra doctors originally ascribed to Communist Chinese and Korean “brainwashing.” They then repackaged the techniques, rebranded them under some ‘transactional analysis’ label and used them to destroy and create new personalities in victims of its experiments. Ironically, the authors of this coercive persuasion program would spend the rest of their careers attacking what they called cults – largely excluding the groups they had a hand in creating. In a devious twist, those very doctors, led by Jolly West, would subsequently use their experiments to accuse other groups they wanted to eliminate of applying their own “coercive persuasion” techniques. More importantly, the Military Industrial Intelligence complex would use the methodologies and principles learned to implement mass mind control mechanisms that effect our everyday lives today. 

CIA and SLA Cult, Part II

Reference:  The Second CIA Cult – Symbionese Liberation Army

Instead of asking for a cash ransom for the release of Patty Hearst, the Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA) demanded that her father, media magnate William Randolph Hearst Jr, supply poor Californians with $2 Million of free food. The demand resulted in a sea change in public opinion, especially with the radical left which the SLA had alienated with the assassination of Marcus Foster. The right exacerbated the problem with reactionary responses to the demand. Governor Reagan told the media that he hoped that the poor people who would receive the food would contract botulism.

Cinque and his SLA crew dominated the media for the next two months. It issued “communiques” decrying what it called the fascist corporate state and its institutionalized racism, peppered with criticisms of the elder Hearst’s inept execution of the “feed the needy” demands. Boosting the SLA ride to fame, Patty Hearst announced that she was no longer a kidnap victim, but instead a card-carrying member of the SLA. She participated in the SLA’s armed robbery of the Hibernia Bank in downtown San Francisco. Security camera footage with Patty lording over face-down customers with a semi-automatic weapon would be run multiple times in virtually every major media forum for the next two years. Here is Hearst with Donald “Cinque” DeFreeze during the robbery:

Cinque’s intoxicating rise to fame would be short lived. After the bank robbery, Cinque issued a communique that would seal the fate of himself and all of the SLA in his vicinity. He broadcasted a ‘death warrant’ for the man who put him up to black radicalism and SLA formation in the first place. That was the coordinator of the Berkley/prison Black Cultural Association. It wasn’t the death pronouncement that marked the SLA for massacre, it was the reason articulated by Cinque:

“Colston Westbrook: male, black, age 55, brown eyes, brown hair, 5-8, 210 pounds, Berkley language instructor, resident of Oakland is a government agent, worked for the CIA in Vietnam as interrogator and torturer in Phoenix operation and also served same purpose in other foreign countries, now working for military intelligence while giving cross assistance to the FBI.”

Apparently, Donald DeFreeze (a/k/a Cinque) had been triggered when he learned of Westbrook’s background (which had by then been published in alternative newspapers). Informed observers reckoned DeFreeze must have realized then why Westbrook had prompted him to target the beloved Marcus Foster: to turn the public against Black activists, thus justifying more military policing of them (just as called for in COINTELPRO). The Westbrook communique signified that the gloves were off and the CIA and military intelligence were being teed up for the worst possible exposure and publicity imaginable. 

That prompted two credible, informed and disrelated observers to come to the same conclusion as to the ultimate fate of DeFreeze and the SLA. One was private investigator and author Lake Headley whom Manson prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi called “the best private eye on earth.” The other was DeFreeze’s operative handler when he was serving as an informant for the Los Angeles Police Department, Detective Ronald Farwell. After Defreeze exposed and targeted CIA man Westbrook, both Headley and Farwell independently predicted there would be no arrest of Cinque and his SLA. Instead, both predicted Cinque and company would all be slaughtered in a shoot-out.

Shortly thereafter, on May 17 1974, the LAPD tracked down Cinque and the SLA to a small ramshackle home in Southeast Los Angeles. They surrounded it with over 400 officers, heavily armed with several armored vehicles. The house was pummeled with over 4,000 rounds of ammunition. It was burnt to the ground by incendiary cannisters shot into it. There were no survivors. Shreiber’s Revolution’s End shares a number of controversies about the incident, including whether a meaningful chance to surrender was given, whether a woman SLA member attempted to surrender but was shot in the back, and whether Cinque’s head was removed and destroyed to cover up evidence of psychosurgery he may have received as part of MK Search ‘treatment’ at Vacaville. Schrieber also outlines the big lessons the government clearly wanted the public to take away. It was the first time, and a warning for the future, that military grade force was and would be used domestically in an overwhelming fashion against ideological resistance. It was also the first time the networks’ ‘mini-cam’ technology was put to use so that the several hour pyrotechnic massacre was broadcast live across the nation. In Shreiber’s view, these facts tend to corroborate the claim that Donald DeFreeze was an unwitting MK Ultra victim put up to incredibly ill-informed, spectacular acts of rebellion which would justify  implementation of repressive police measures. Here are the remains of the Symbionese Liberation Army’s Alamo:

It was not until the coroner identified the burnt and bullet ridden bodies that the police discovered Patricia Hearst and two other SLA members, Bill and Emily Harris, were missing.  Hearst and the Harris’ avoided the others’ fate by virtue of luck. The day before they had engaged in their own shoot out over a shoplifting rap laid on Bill Harris at an L.A. Sporting Goods outlet and escaped to parts unknown.   

After the SLA massacre, the Harrises and Hearst went on the lam, crisscrossing America, hidden by left wing activists. During that nearly year and a half period, Hearst participated in more SLA communiques and another bank heist in which a bystander was murdered by her crew. 

Finally, on  September 18, 1975, Hearst was arrested in San Francisco. 

Jack Ruby Redux

To fully appreciate what follows, it would helpful if you read CIA Cult Creation – The Manson Family, with particular attention to what CIA MK Ultra psychiatrist Dr. Lois Jolyon “Jolly” West did. That is, West’s going to extraordinary lengths to wheedle his way into a federal court proceeding in order to influence it’s outcome by suspicious means. Just as in the case of Jack Ruby, West apparently went ex parte (off the record) to the Federal judge assigned to hear the Hearst case to have himself put in a position to manipulate the outcome of the case from the outset. We caused the public availability of the United States vs. Patricia Hearst record, which had been mothballed in off-site archives for more than 50 years, to be scanned and made available to the public.  (Hearst trial transcripts) The record is revealing. On the 23rd of September 1975, just four days after Hearst’s arraignment the judge ordered sua sponte (on his own, not upon any motion brought by either side) that Hearst’s mental fitness for trial be determined after the examination by court-appointed psychiatrists named Roland Levy, Donald Lundy, Seymour Pollack, and Chalmers Johnson. 

Two days later, on the 25th inexplicably and with no rationale provided, the judge again issued a sua sponte order, amending his order of the 23rd. The new order eliminated doctors Levy and Johnson and replaced them with “L.J. WEST, and MARGARET THALER.” So apparently unfamiliar with those involved, the judge omitted the latter’s last name, “Singer”, Margaret Thaler Singer, a longtime protégé of West. There is no record whatsoever of how or why the judge suddenly substituted the CIA’s West (along with partner Singer) into the mix. But just like the Ruby case, West took charge of the stable of psychiatrists. He added another MK Ultra colleague, Dr. Martin Orne, and CIA friendly ‘expert’ Robert J. Lifton. Finally, West proceeded to dig into Patricia Hearts with an intensity that made his Jack Ruby programming look like a picnic.

Seven days after the entry of West, his Jack Ruby case defense team member, former FBI agent and high profile CIA-friendly attorney F. Lee Bailey, entered his appearance on behalf of Hearst. The odds of these two CIA birds randomly rendezvousing in the Hearst case as they did in the Ruby case are incalculably tiny. Here is West lecturing Bailey and his team of CIA-affiliated psychiatrists on Hearst trial strategy in their San Francisco hotel:

The Brainwashing of Patty Hearst?

What is known of West’s dozens of hours spent with Patty Hearst reflects a classic case of brainwashing, mind control, or as psychiatry had come to relabel it – coercive persuasion. 

Hearst was resistant at first. Even after her arrest she made defiant expressions of solidarity with the American radical left. Upon booking she listed her occupation as “urban guerilla”, and flashed a closed fist leftist salute to media cameras. 

By her own account in her autobiography, a strong case can be made that West practiced more effective MK Mind Control than he had on Jack Ruby. Like Jack Ruby, Hearst found West “too soothing to be trusted.” But, apparently unlike Ruby, Hearst capitulated. She wrote that West’s “creepy, hypnotic voice” somehow overwhelmed her: “I simply crumpled under his scrutiny. I cried, murmuring and mumbling out replies that were not answers to his questions.”  (Quotations from Every Secret Thing, autobiography of Patricia Hearst)

Once her defenses were stripped, West lectured Hearst at length about his experience with the returning US soldiers who were ‘brainwashed’ in North Korean prison camps in the early 1950s. That included how they were saved from hanging for treason only by making the claim they had been “brainwashed” to testify to their captors about U.S. war crimes. He also committed the first cardinal sin of any legitimate counselling by telling Hearst what she ought to consider is ‘wrong’ with her. West informed Hearst that she had “traumatic neurosis with dissociative features”, “which meant simply that I was frightened out of my wits by the SLA, subjected to powerfully effective coercive manipulation by my captors, and that I would need three to four months of psychiatric treatment before I would be ‘able with full competence to aid and assist counsel in my own defense.’” (Every Secret Thing)

Just as in the Jack Ruby case (see, CIA Mind Control and the Assassination of JFK), West was originally appointed by the court to determine fitness of the defendant for trial but gaslit the court into subsequently accepting his conversion to a defense team psychiatrist. The odds of a psychiatrist successfully executing that sleight of hand in two of the most high-profile cases in U.S. history are impossibly slim. 

And so, West arranged for a handpicked psychotherapist, and his mind control colleagues, Dr. Singer, Dr. Lifton, and Dr Orne to spend many dozens of hours programming his evaluation into the head of Patricia Hearst. This is a conservative characterization by comparison to U.S. Attorney James Browning’s, lead prosector in U.S. vs. Patricia Hearst. 

Ultimately, he put it very bluntly to the jury: 

“Did [Hearst] do all of those things, and can you really believe she did all of those things because of fear from the Harrises (SLA members), or was it because she was reprogrammed by the psychiatrists, by the defense attorneys, with a view in mind to painting the very picture that has been painted of her here to you ladies and gentlemen?” (emphasis added)

Think about that. A United States Attorney from the Department of Justice suggesting that CIA employed and/or affiliated doctors Jolly West, Margaret Singer, Martin Orne and Robert Lifton “programmed” the mind of Patricia Hearst to carry out a stage-managed fiction to present before a U.S. Federal District Court judge and jury. Why? What were they hiding?

This was no whimsical allegation by Browning. It was based on the following evidence presented to the jury.

At page 2186 of the trial transcript the prosecution read from a West/Hearst psychiatric session transcript where West instructs (not asks, counsels or exams) Hearst on what her attorney told him would be the legal strategy and how she was to play along:   

“To emphasize the involuntary and violent way in which you were dragged out of a relatively normal life with a forcible and terrifying sort of indoctrination that you got, and the tremendous pressure of threats in the beginning to make you subservient and compliant with the leadership of this group so that they would be able to keep control of you.”  Remarkably, West does not ask Hearst if this is accurate or bears any resemblance to reality. Instead, he tries to sell her on the presentation: “I think myself that is the best explanation for what happened. I haven’t heard anything to make me think otherwise. Doesn’t that sound logical to you?”

At page 2189 self-proclaimed expert hypnotist West’s hypnotic-sounding command to Hearst, sealing the trial strategy deal, is read into the record:

“You are relatively suggestible. I would say if sensitized, easily deceived, especially if dependent on someone. You were so successfully coerced.”

Referring to West’s conditioning, U.S. Attorney Browning summed up the jury’s duty during closing argument: “One has only to question whether [West] was asking the defendant, whether he was evaluating the defendant or whether he was telling the defendant.”

(pg. 4450 trial transcript)

Despite several days of several West coordinated psychiatrists and America’s most famous trial lawyer (Bailey) trying to muddy the waters, the jury unanimously agreed that beyond a reasonable doubt Jolly West and his fellow CIA psychiatrists were the ones who performed mind control on Patty Hearst and not Donald DeFreeze and Symbionese Liberation Army. 

Hearst was convicted of bank robbery with a firearm and sentenced to 7 years in prison.

Cinque the MK Ultra Practitioner

While the jury agreed with the prosecution that the only Mind Control that was practiced on Patricia Hearst was that of Dr. Jolly West, it very nearly learned a highly protected state secret. So intent on diverting attention to DeFreeze was West that he very nearly outed his CIA brethren James Hamilton (MK Search 3 operator at California Corrections medical facility at Vacaville, during DeFreeze’s stay and participation in his medical experiments). West spit out that DeFreeze had learned effective mind control from his subjugation to Hamilton’s ‘treatment’: “Cinque was looking for a successful political conversion in the well-known revolutionary tradition (Maoist) of ‘thought reform.’ His experience in prison had taught him also that following a period of isolation, solitary confinement or ‘black hole,’ where people are kept in darkness, an inmate would be unusually susceptible to political indoctrination.”

(pg 2160 trial transcript) (Emphasis added)

Dr. Colin Ross, author of The CIA Doctors, connected the dots West left: “Where did a street hood and unsuccessful robber like Donald DeFreeze learn such sophisticated programming techniques?…My conclusion is that Defreeze was a controlled controller, created in part by Phoenix Program veteran Colston Westbrook.” 

So, we wind up asking ourselves “who was brainwashing whom?”

Recall in our Manson episode that confusing picture left behind in San Francisco in 1967 by MK Ultra doctors Jolly West and James Hamilton. It was difficult to discern whether Charles Manson and the CIA crossing paths was an accident, or Manson was programmed to kill, or even Manson was taught to program to kill. The same bizarre web was left behind Vacaville prison and the US District Court by West and Hamilton. Was Donald Defreeze programmed to kill, programmed to program to kill, and was Patty Hearst programmed by DeFreeze or by Dr. West, or even by both of them?   

In, out, back in, and out

After being convicted in March 1976, Hearst was released on bail pending appeal in November of 1976. After her appeals all the way to the US Supreme Court were exhausted Hearst was re-incarcerated in May 1978. Having lost at every level she disconnected from Bailey and hired a new, aggressive lawyer, George Martinez. In September of 78 he moved to reduce the sentence against Hearst. In early October, he filed material that West-influenced Bailey wouldn’t touch. That is the declaration of Clifford Jefferson a fellow inmate of DeFreeze’s subjected to the CIA MK Search mind control program at Vacaville. He summarized Jefferson’s declaration in his pleading as follows:

“Clifford Jefferson relates that Donald DeFreeze stated to him the CIA was conducting tests to try out certain drugs on inmates and that he had been in it. The tests were on the third floor of the facility in B-3 (at Vacaville). That Jefferson went there and met two CIA men who were giving the tests and who gave him drugs which wiped out his memory; that DeFreeze stated to Jefferson he had gone through the same tests and knew of certain stress tests; that Defreeze told Jefferson that when he got out of prison, they would kidnap a rich person and give him drugs and the person would become a robot and do anything he asked to do.”  – ADDITIONAL EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE, filed October 6, 1978

Famed syndicated Columnist Jack Anderson was tipped off in advance and wrote a column about Jefferson, spreading the news across the country. (see October 5 1978 column). 

Worse still for the CIA, its biggest nemesis of the seventies, California Congressman Leo J Ryan, was clearly coordinating with Hearst’s new lawyer. He was already riding the Director of the CIA Admiral Stansfield Turner on the matter (see Ryan letter to Turner). Ryan’s September 27th 1978 letter demanded confirmation or denial regarding “CIA experiments using prisoners at the California medical facility at Vacaville”, specifically referring to “Donald DeFreeze, now deceased, who was the leader known as CINQUE of the Symbionese Liberation Army” and “Clifford Jefferson.”

On October 18th, Deputy CIA Director Frank Carlucci responded. Astonishingly, he admitted “it is true that CIA-sponsored testing, using volunteer inmates, was conducted at that facility.” His denial of DeFreeze and Jefferson involvement was carefully worded: “In so far as our records reflect the names of the participants, there is nothing to indicate that either was in any way involved in the project.”  It is an incredible denial given the CIA’s habit of destroying embarrassing documents en masse.

Given that the CIA’s Oct 1978 denial was contradicted by the fact that Jack Anderson had extracted an acknowledgement from Vacaville Superintendent T. Lawrence Clanon that “DeFreeze had volunteered for medical research in July 1970 shortly after he entered Vacaville” (See Anderson column), and Ryan’s history of pursuing CIA secrets like a bull dog, you can take it to the bank that as of shortly after 18 October 1978 (date of D/Director Carlucci letter) Ryan was pursuing new means of uncovering the whole truth. Why the paper trail ends in late October 1978 will be answered in future chapters. Those episodes explore another epic American tragedy which, until now, nobody had any reason to believe had anything to do with U.S. vs. Patricia Hearst.

Postscript on Hearst

Less than two months after the CIA’s Vacaville hijinks were put front and center before a Federal District Court Judge (Motion to reduce sentence) and the American public at large (Jack Anderson column), and smack dab in the middle of the CIA Director’s desk, and Leo J. Ryan’s pursuit of the CIA came to a climactic, violent conclusion (see coming chapters), the Patty Hearst affair was abruptly put to rest by the President of the United States. Despite the fact Hearst’s appeals were rejected all the way up to the United States Supreme Court, and despite her losing repeated motions to reduce or vacate her sentence, President Jimmy Carter would commute Hearst’s sentence, setting her free. After two long years of the most expensive defense ever produced in America striking out, only after the CIA’s fingerprints were presented did the Hearst saga surprisingly end.

In pursuing the whole truth from the CIA, Congressman Leo J. Ryan would not be so fortunate.