Monthly Archives: June 2017

Going Clear, Part 21- Headley lawsuit, FBI sting

Going Clear, Part 21 transcript:

Mark Rathbun: A key part of the anti-Scientology narrative as partially authored by Lawrence Wright, continuously published by Tony Ortega, endlessly repeated by Mike Rinder and other outlets on the troll farms, is: ‘Dang, we had Scientology – the FBI was right on them yet they got saved by this thorny Constitution interpreted by limp-wristed liberal justices of the Ninth Circuit.’  That literally is an invented narrative on several levels. The first level is this, if you read the opinion you don’t need the Constitution, you don’t even need a constitutional analysis.  First of all, the Ninth Circuit’s statement of the constitutional protections afford to religion is absolutely accurate. That it was applied to Scientology is absolutely nothing new. It has been consistently applied by courts for decades.  So, there is no news there. But, if you read the opinion, the court did not even need the Constitution. It found on a factual basis, if you literally broke down the facts, it didn’t even need the Constitution, because they found facts didn’t support the civil wrongs that were alleged.  Now, we know that the FBI investigation was prompted by the Headleys and really that was the core of their case.  The court said ‘factually’ they don’t have a case.  Factually.  Now, the problem is compounded. As early as April 2010 the only significant ‘defector’ from high up in Scientology who said anything after 2090 was John Brouseau.  And I arranged for John Brouseau to speak with the FBI.  And John Brouseau told the FBI, “I have seen no violence on behalf of David Miscavige or anybody else at the upper levels of Scientology. I have seen no evidence of anything they call the ‘hole’ for the several years that I have been there – since most of these people (who had already spoke to the FBI) left the church.”  None of the stuff that was the advertised crux of the FBI investigation existed. The only percipient witness, the only person who was in a position to know and a position to see – who was speaking to the FBI on behalf of the complainants (the Headleys), said ‘there’s no there there.’  And that in effect was the end of the FBI investigation.  The only conversations that I had with the FBI after that point (when Brouseau had testified) were about how to sting Scientology executives on a potential obstruction of justice rap.  In other words, do that the FBI usually does to somebody in a white collar case. 88% or 90% of the time, when they are going after somebody in a white collar case, they get them covering up.  I told them, ‘you can troll them.’  In FBI lingo, that is ‘sting them.’  Get them to do something stupid.  And in fact the FBI engaged in it.  And Scientology didn’t take the bait.  And now even the sting was over by 2010.  So, this whole narrative about how the Constitution saved Scientology from scrutiny by the FBI was entirely invented. Lawrence Wright said he was going to cover it in his (New Yorker) article because the FBI has a dismal record when it comes to dealing with “cults.”  Wright said, “sometimes they need incentive.” So, clearly Wright was trying to give them a black eye to incentivize them to go after Scientology. It is quite the motivation of an unbiased journalist, right?  

Going Clear, Part 20 Wright’s Straw Man

Going Clear, Part 20 transcript:

Mark Rathbun: Wright sets up a couple of straw men. They are related. The first straw man is the idea that Scientology is all predicated on the idea that Hubbard cured himself from being crippled and blinded and that this all happened at the Oak Knoll Naval hospital.  First of all, and I went through this in spades with Wright, demonstrating that that is a straw man.  It is a false premise.  The representation does not really exist, number one.  And number two, what actually happened at Oak Knoll didn’t involve L Ron Hubbard. And I gave him all the lectures where Hubbard covered it.  Hubbard did not say that he cured himself at Oak Knoll Naval hospital. He said he discovered the fundamental techniques of Dianetics by engaging in two-way communication therapy of sorts with people who were recovering from illnesses there.  And he talks about it at length and in detail. If you know anything about Dianetics and Scientology you can see. I gave him all the materials and explained it to him for days and gave him the primer so that he could understand it.  It makes perfect and logical sense.  Wright’s invented theory is based on a straw man. 

Going Clear, Part 19 – IRS and NBC’s attempted ambush

Going Clear, Part 19 transcript:

Mark Rathbun: The only media that I was asked to participate in when the book Going Clear came out in January 2013 was when Larry Wright asked me if I would be willing to go to New York to interview with NBC’s Rock Center. Wright said “you are a central person in this whole thing; so, could you do that and talk about the book?”  I said, “sure.”  And I don’t even know if I had read the book by that point.  I flew to New York. I spent an entire half a day with Harry Smith (NBC New). It was this elaborate set up.  It was in the Waldorf Astoria in this old, historic room – it was like a library.  We were there for an entire morning and into the afternoon. In the entire time we were in there, Smith did what Larry Wright had done with me a year or two earlier.  He tried to get this generalized statement that Scientology’s tax exemption was fraudulently or illegitimately obtained.  And he tried angle after angle on me. It was like Larry Wright redux.  Larry Wright had gone through the same thing with me.  And I went through chapter and verse and detail about how you don’t get it. ‘Yeah, there was some hardball, but you don’t get it, when the IRS is coming after you have to play hardball back or you meet your demise. You are getting all caught up in these tactics, and the bottom line is, the thing they just want to write out of history, is: All the hardball tactics did was get us to the table.  And at that point they (the IRS) held the cards and every anti-Scientology voice, every person who had been there (the IRS) for twenty years and had this deep institutional bias – every one of them was fully heard. And we had to answer to every one of them; and this went on for two years.  And Harry Smith is looking at me, like he is pissed. He can’t believe that there is all of this information coming out. All he wants is to get to ‘cut and print’ on ‘the whole thing was a sham.’  And so, it went on for three hours.  It got to the point where, like it had with Wright a year and half earlier, of sort of this testiness and disappointment. We finally finished. I couldn’t wait to get out of there and get back home.  So, unsurprisingly, I guess, two weeks later the show plays and I’m not in it.  Very clearly, what is what Larry Wright sent me to New York for and what Harry Smith was briefed on to get.  And, they didn’t get it.  So, they just cut it out.

Going Clear, Part 18 – BBC’s John Sweeny

Going Clear, Part 18 Transcript:

Mark Rathbun:  Wright goes into how allegedly the BBC’s John Sweeny “never had such emotional and psychological pressure placed upon  him as he did with Scientology”; even though he covered the war in Bosnia and Chechnya and other kinds of similar business.  Then Wright downplays Sweeny’s meltdown where he screamed obscenities at Scientologists by saying that “Sweeny shouted in an oddly slow cadence.”  Total euphemism for a guy having a mental meltdown on the middle of a set.  Sweeneys producer, Sarah Mole, and Sweeney himself both told me unequivocally that the entire story that Sweeney did (wherein the meltdown occurred) on Scientology that Larry Wright is referring to, was a trolling operation.  There was no subject of investigation.  They did not even have a phony reason, like Larry Wright gives in his book, for his “investigation.”  Instead, they literally set forth to conduct a trolling operation to see what reaction they could cause from the church and that would be the subject of the piece.  In other words, we’re investigating you and we’re going too be as noisy obnoxious as we can and we’re going to document your reaction to that.  And that was the entire thing. So, for Wright to position John Sweeney as some seasoned, brave guy who undertook an even braver task to look into Scientology is complete and utter fiction. 

Going Clear, Part 17 – Haggis Resignation Letter

Going Clear, Part 17 transcript:

Mark Rathbun:  Wright alleges that  “by October (2009) Rathbun got hold of the letter (Paul Haggis’ Scientology resignation letter).  Actually, I have an email dated 23 August where I am already talking to Haggis, not only do I have the letter I am giving Haggis detailed, meticulous instructions about how to present it deceptively to media contacts that I have established – this is two  months prior to October.  It didn’t as Wright states “find its way” to me; Paul Haggis sent it to me directly by email. Paul Haggis consulted with me every step of the way, how he should position this and how he should do this.  Quote from Going Clear:  “He (Rathbun) called Haggis who was shooting (film) in Pittsburgh and asked if he could publish the letter on his blog.”  In fact, two months earlier than that Paul Haggis wrote to me (Rathbun) and made me the coordinating point on seeing to it that his letter was published.  So, how could I be asking him to publish it two months later?  I coached Haggis through every step of the way on the release of his letter. What a prima donna. This process went on for two months.  (This was part of the phony narrative making Haggis look like he was operating on his own initiative, the John Wayne narrative. It was invented.)

Going Clear, Part 16 – More Paul Haggis Inventions

 

Going Clear, Part 16 transcript:

Mark Rathbun:  At page 319 Wright goes back to his narrative on Paul Haggis.  Wright writes “Haggis was casting the movie The Next Three Days in the summer of 2009 and he asked Jason Beghe to read a part for his detective.”   Wright writes about Haggis connecting back up with Jason Beghe.  This is like a film script from Haggis.  Quote: “‘I just want you to know I am no longer in Scientology,’ Beghe told Haggis when called. ‘Actually, I am one of its most outspoken critics; the church would be very unhappy if you hire me.”  The whole thing sounds dramatic and daring on Haggis’ part. In reality, the matter was quite mundane.  Wright omits that the reason Paul Haggis called Jason Beghe is because I already told Haggis that Jason was out of the church. I also asked Haggis to do ME (Mark Rathbun) a favor and find some work for Beghe who was nearing need of psychiatric care for anxiety of his long spell of no work  in Hollywood.  He was a wreck. His confidence was shot.  That is all omitted.  So the invent a ‘cold call’ by Paul Haggis to Beghe.  They make Paul look like   strong me like “hey, when I decide to cast somebody, I cast somebody.”  Wright makes Haggis out to be John Wayne.  Wright makes it look like Haggis is learning for the first time Jason is out of the church when he calls to cast him. Which is bullshit, because the only reason he is calling is because I already told him he was out of the church.  I gave Haggis Jason Beghe’s entire history. I had Haggis watch all of Beghe’s antiScientology videos on Youtube – all before Haggis ever called Beghe, or even had the idea to call Beghe.  It is like they (Wright and Haggis) are living a Hollywood fantasy.  They make Haggis look some sort of macho guy. I mean, Haggis spoke to me for DAYS before he would make the Beghe call I asked him to make.  This is all invention. 

Going Clear, Part 15 – Paul Haggis Phony Narrative

Going Clear, Part 15 transcript:

Mark Rathbun: This is where we show the underlying phony narrative going on with Wright’s book.  Quote from “Going Clear”:  “Because (Paul) Haggis stopped complained (Tommy) Davis felt the issue had been laid to rest.  But, far from putting the matter Haggis began an investigation into the church. His inquiry, much of it conducted online, echoed the actions of the lead character he was writing for Russell Crowe in the Next Three Days ”, who goes on the internet to research a way to break his wife out.”  This is such patent patronizing using his own created character to him (Haggis) look like a hero in a movie.  The reason I earlier covered all this business on the subject of homosexuality (that was busting the myth that Scientology was ever even as homophobic as the American Psychological Association, much less any other religion in America) is there is all this emphasis on Paul Haggis so suddenly shocked that Scientology didn’t necessarily promote homosexuality (as his reason for becoming “disillusioned” with the church); It is false, this is false.  First, he did not begin an investigation of Scientology after an alleged tiff with a church representative over Proposition 8 (Gay marriage initiative).  To the contrary, Haggis sat on his butt.  Write writes “what is so striking about Haggis’ investigation is that few prominent figures attached to the church have looked into the charges that have surrounded their institution for many years.”  Again, Wright is going to lionize and dramatize this alleged altruistic nature that sets Paul Haggis apart from the rest of these scum Scientology celebrities who won’t look.  Again, I am telling you Haggis did not do that.  This is false. What actually happened was that a year after this intro (about Haggis’s alleged shock the Church did not lobby in favor of Proposition 8) that Wright created, I received a mailing list that had Paul Haggis’ email address on it.  I initiated with him an initially anonymous email communication, directing his attention to media that I had participated in.  I did it very cleverly to draw his interest to get him talking about it before he even knew who I was.  This cat and mouse game went on for several days. He read the media I directed him to and only THEN did he begin to investigate (it has ZERO to do with any issue every remoted related to the created story about his alleged outrage about Scientology’s position concerning homosexuality).

To give Larry Wright a break. After his initial Scientology story about Haggis in New Yorker (the predicate for his later book Going Clear), Paul Haggis phoned me and he said “Marty could you do me a big, big, big favor?”  Because, of course he knew Larry Wright had chosen me to be the sort of surrogate for the Church (since the Church had no interest in dealing with him) – just so his due diligence would be done. So, Paul knew that I was a huge part of the Wright created Haggis/Scientology narrative.  Haggis said to me, “look, for the sake of my image with my daughters, can you please avoid telling Larry Wright that it was you who prompted me to go do an investigation into the church?”  I told him, “look man, I am not going to lie to Wright but I will deceive him by not originating it.  Unless he specifically asks me point on, I will bob and weave, but I am telling you if I get asked straight up, I am not going to outright lie for.”  Oh, Paul was profusely thanking me because it was very important for his image with his kids. Now, in retrospect, now that I have seen the whole Going Clear campaign and movie have rolled out, I am pretty sure that he couldn’t give a rat’s about his kids.  Instead, it is important for his own public image because he rode this sort of rode this pro gay rights wave as a PR vehicle and to paint himself as heroic.  This entire passage by Wright is critical to Haggis’ entire narrative and that is why he has got to pump it up, “What is so striking about Haggis’ investigation is that NO prominent Scientologist has ever charted and trailblazed the land that he decided unilaterally to go blaze.”  The problem is, he didn’t. It didn’t happen. 

Going Clear, Part 14 Vexatious Litigants Lionized

Going Clear, Part 14 transcript:

Mark Rathbun: So then Wright goes into this guy Michael Pattinson. He’s a guy who claimed to be gay and discriminated against by Scientology. And he brought a lawsuit about it against the church and John Travolta…and I think me, and I think David Miscavige. I mean it was one of those nutcase lawsuits where he listed Bill Clinton who was the sitting president of the United States of America at the time of this lawsuit.  Larry Wright doesn’t tell you that in his book.  More like, “this is a very grave, important lawsuit on the issue of homosexuality that Michael Pattinson brought.” Wright writes “that case was voluntarily withdrawn after an avalanche of countersuits. Both Pattinson and his attorneys say they were driven into bankruptcy.”  I was there when that lawsuit got filed and you know what it was good for?  Comedic relief.  And that is how the court viewed it. It was a complete shopping cart lady lawsuit.  Yet, Wright makes it sound like legitimate thing here and that these people were somehow systematically destroyed for having the temerity to raise these “grave issues.”  And the lawyer who filed the suit, one Graham Berry, was adjudicated by the Superior Court in Los Angeles to be a ’vexatious litigant.’  That meant Berry was required to have his pleadings read and vetted by the court before he could even lodge a new lawsuit.  This case was so frivolous that the attorney who filed it lost his right to bring another lawsuit without prior judicial authorization.  Wright did not share these inconvenient facts. 

Going Clear, Part 13 Lawrence Wright’s actual malice re IRS

Going Clear, Part 13 summary:

Rathbun details the two years of ‘living hell’ the IRS put the Church of Scientology through before deciding there was no remaining grounds by which they could deny it tax exemption.  The IRS thoroughly examined every entity even marginally related to the church, including examining ten years of Founder L. Ron Hubbard’s taxes long after his death, including settlement of his estate.  It was only after the IRS exhausted every lead through all of the books and activities of every entity that they concluded, “Ok, they’re all exempt.”  It wasn’t that the church asked for or demanded every entity receive exemption; it was that the IRS insisted upon examining them.  Wright was informed of all this. Not only did he not report it, he wondered aloud in his book how it was that the IRS ‘caved’ to the church’s alleged demand for across the board exemptions.  Per Rathbun, Wright “never let the facts get in the way of his narrative.”  Wright asserts it was odd the IRS granted exemption when the “courts had repeatedly ruled in its favor” against Scientology. In fact, Rathbun shared dozens of more then-recent decisions the church had been racking up against the IRS, decisions that put the IRS in an legally untenable position should it not afford Scientology a full consideration for exemption for the many years which had yet to be adjudicated.  Rathbun details some of those decisions. None of it was mentioned in Wright’s book to maintain the fiction there was something untoward about the IRS’s 1993 tax exemption recognition of Scientology churches.  Clearly, Wright was setting up an “authoritative” book to use for the purpose of attempting to have Scientology’s tax exemption removed. That later proved to be the case when Wright, his film Director Alex Gibney, and paid witness Mike Rinder strenuously campaigned to have exactly that done – on the basis of the book Going Clear and its movie adaptation.  “I went through all of this with Wright, all of it, for many hours, including many follow up phone calls.”  None of it made it in the book.

Going Clear, Part 12 – IRS and religion invention

Going Clear, Part 12 summary

Wright invents the ‘fact’ that the IRS in 1992 settlement negotiations was making a determination of whether or not Scientology was a religion, a task he adjudicates the IRS was ‘ill-equipped’ to do.  Rathbun, recounts how he had explicitly, long prior to publication, demonstrated to Wright that his was not only not the case, but could not be the case.  Scientology had won that determination in court in 1967, after years of the IRS attempting to challenge it.  Since then, Rathbun told Wright, dozens of courts had reconfirmed that finding. It was such settled law that even the IRS wanted to make such an adjudication in 1992 they were powerless to do so.  Yet, Wright alleges the “unqualified” IRS set out to do so in 1982.