Category Archives: Uncategorized

Operation Mockingbird: CIA mind/behavior control program

The CIA Mind Control program (MK Ultra) was largely secret until journalist Seymour Hersch shamed Congress into investigating CIA domestic ops in the mid-seventies (albeit some thirty plus years after L. Ron Hubbard originally exposed it). One of the subsequent Senate Committees barely touched upon a broader mind control program the CIA had been cultivating on the heels of MK Ultra. That was Operation Mockingbird, designed to weaponize the U.S. media to control the minds of Americans on a mass scale. The Committee found “fifty journalists who had official, but secret, relationships with the CIA” to influence media.

This aligned with the CIA’s apparent intent to use propaganda as a more “acceptable” form of mass ‘behavior control.” That is detailed in a 1973 CIA memo summarizing control techniques:

“[T]he most innocuous, most effective and acceptable means of effecting behavioral control or change is education. The educative process which includes propaganda techniques, does not merely transmit information but a belief or value system as well. It is the latter which often provides the impetus to dramatic and difficult to understand behavior, e.g., suicidal terrorist activities.” (The document)

We are learning in real time that despite representations to the contrary those programs to control our minds with misinformation and disinformation were expanded and are apparently in full force today. Our current Director of National Intelligence, decidedly senior to the CIA and its alphabet soup, expanding network of US intelligence agencies, has recently been alerting the American public to current clandestine propaganda operations that make Operation Mockingbird look like child’s play. This is big news over alternative, citizen media. Tellingly, very little of it is in corporate media. Here is a short sum up:

The Trump administration weathered several months of nationwide violent riots, sponsored by leftwing nonpolitical groups largely funded by our own government (coordinated by CIA through USAID and the thousands of NGO’s – non government political fronts – it funds). Their issue? The cancellation of your tax dollars being used to create such destruction of property and persons. How could this be happening in real time, against the titular head of all US intelligence and in defiance of the sitting United States President? CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou answers that question in a lengthy interview with Tucker Carlson. He describes how CIA veterans have innumerable means of non complying with a Commander in Chief who thinks he is senior to them. They use banks of psychiatrists and psychologists to analyze and coach the CIA on how to manipulate and confuse sitting presidents. They reckon they can conduct business as usual before even an energetic President can get to the bottom of their clandestine ops. These are short segments within a lengthy interview. If you care about your presidential vote being meaningful, you may want to hear the whole thing: Carlson with John Kireakou.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) Revisited

Over the past year I have rung the warning bell about the dangers of complacency vis a vis the rise of Artificial Intelligence.  Examples:

Since then I have learned to work with available AI chatbots as a means to enhance investigation, research and discovery rather than to replace it.  I believe it is at that exact point where AI turns from a potential liability into an asset. When one reveres it as something worthy of replacing one’s own judgement and line of curiosity, ala the ‘superintelligence’ Mark Zuckerberg is presently pimping, one is headed for slavery.  On the other hand, if one uses its greatest features as a servant it can serve useful purposes. Those feature today are its unparalleled ability to rapidly and accurately sift through massive amounts of data, sort it and evaluate it without bias or emotion.

Emotion is a completely natural thing and not something to be avoided or suppressed.  Emotional intelligence is important for personal interactions and implementation of solutions when they have effects on people. There are exceptions, however. For example, when one is required to apply straight reasoning to come to a logical conclusion about the facts of a matter, emotion can and does alter truth.  Well-constructed AI platforms offer an incredible tool for a) sifting through mountains of data to find specific important facts (finding and separating signal from noise), and b) evaluating those facts without bias or emotion. 

While utilizing AI, some things have to be kept in mind and compensated for.  First, not all AI platforms are equal.  There are only two that I have found to be comprehensive, consistently accurate, and unbiased.  Those are X’s AI platform called “Grok”, and Chat GPT.  Caveat: over the past several months programming changes have been introduced by Grok to make it far more obedient to Establishment narratives (perhaps reflective of Musk’s recent taming by economic forces). The second concern is that even those platforms are held back by the data they must rely upon. That data in large part is dominated by the arrogance and politics/vested interests infected media, intelligentsia and academia (the generators of much of the current internet data banks). But, intelligently lead conversations can cut through a lot of that with appeal to Chat GPT’s logic, largely uninfected by bias and emotion. By contrast I have found Microsoft’s Copilot AI to be largely incapable of looking and “thinking” outside the Overton windows established by the Establishment.  Even worse is Google’s Gemini. It has so thoroughly programmed in political correctness and wokeness that its Artificial Intelligence is in truth a liability. 

Grok and Chat GPT may in fact represent a window of opportunity.  That window is open only so long as those AI platforms are not monetized. When they are they will be as defective, debilitated and destructive as Google search has now become. Google search has become a whoring tool of corporations to forward pavlovian consumerist behavior on the part of users.  It also enforces deep state, globalist political correctness and wokeness in exchange for protecting its monopoly on search.  For straight information, Google search is literally obsolete in the presence of Grok and Chat GPT.  But, beware. Corporatized Globalist interests (including Wall Street) are coming hard for Grok and Chat GPT.

During this window of opportunity I am using the most useable platforms to their fullest. I will add others as I find they meet the standards of Grok and Chat GPT, or others exceed them as they surrender to $. 

I have a long series of articles planned over the next several months. It will likely proceed something like this. Each week I’ll post a comprehensive story.  It will be followed by 2-3 receipts producers. That is, I will share some AI research – along with its factual citations – that backs up the article’s credibility and in some cases even expands on its theme. It is remarkable what you can learn when you explore topics with a super-informed entity without bias and emotion (something heretofore impossible in a media dominated environment). I think it will be eye-opening as we probe subjects that the Establishment (deep state, the media, and the Globalist-corporatists they serve) have long-since shut the Overton windows upon. Subjects upon which the media has implanted emotions and bias creating an atmosphere of fear and irrationality. Forbidden thought about subjects we’ve been conditioned to believe have long been settled. But, have they really been?

US Foreign Policy For Dummies

America is shifting its global foreign policy (against the howling shrieks of the world Plutocracy – including American socialist institutions) because of one very patent, albeit intentionally obscured, fact of life:

           Russia (and much of Eastern Europe) has evolved from Communist/Atheist to Capitalist/Christian while Western Europe has devolved from Capitalist/Christian to Communist/Atheist.

The American people in November 2024 voted by overwhelming majority to cease bankrolling the Communist/Atheist agenda at home and abroad.  Indeed, it was and is the heart and soul of the current administration’s policy.

 It is by design that the global political picture seems so complex as to defy understanding.  The Globalist Plutocracy (increasingly acting through such vehicles as WEF (World Economic Forum, headed by patent Nazi Klaus Schwab), the EU (European Union, headed by patent Nazi Ursula Gertrude von der Layen) and thoroughly socialist/communist sub arms such as the UN and WHO (World Health Organization) do all in their power to obscure matters. The Globalist Plutocracy owned corporate media intentionally keeps it too complex to grasp.

The Plutocrats create endless distraction in order to cover up the most important, fundamental truths that have unfolded in plain sight, again:

                 Russia (and much of Eastern Europe) has evolved from Communist/Atheist to Capitalist/Christian while Western Europe has devolved from Capitalist/Christian to Communist/Atheist.

The EU has announced with great pleasure that it is backing Germany’s announced rearmament, notwithstanding the fact that its last two rearmaments resulted in World War I and World War II. Its motivation is the enforcement of its modern brand of socialism/communism through Eastern Europe toward the conquering of Russia (notwithstanding its last two such efforts winding up in catastrophe, lead by Napoleon and Hitler).  If Afghanistan is where empires come to die, Russia is where Western European autocracies come to die (Napoleon’s, Hitler’s, and even Stalin/Lenin’s – a decidedly German Marxist import). 

The EU’s recent militarization craze, centered in the heart of 20th Century Reich building, is seasoned with Socialist racism (not a surprise coming from the birthplace of “White Supremacy”). You hear tones of it issuing from modern day autocrats like UK’s Keir “Der” Starmer, France’s Emannuel “the groomed one” Macron, and Germany’s revolving door of Adolf wannabes.  Their dog whistles, subtly but constantly condemn Eastern Europeans and Russians as some sort of Slavic menace.  It is never about policy, it is never about specifics, it is about “the Russians are Coming!” and they must be put down like some rabid beasts. Today’s plutocrats are so irrationally shrill as to look like Dr. Strangelove caricatures.  

The EU has already suspended free speech, interfered in and reversed results in democratic nations’ elections, and continues to promote the killing of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians and Russians to achieve its Communist/Atheist ends.

In spite of the neo maniacal corporate media push to install distractors designed to cause amnesia, never forget history lest you be condemned to not recognizing when it begins to repeat itself.

The recent development of Trump expressing “anger” at Putin and the threat of escalating sanctions against Russia for apparently wanting a less Zelensky/EU dictated peace may be theater. Trump may be attempting to win some EU/Corporate media/Neo Con support for the peace effort. If not, and he genuinely believes he is going to bully Russia into compliance, WWIII is further along than virtually anyone (with the possible exception of Russia and China) realize. Indeed, the NY Time’s recent “expose” (read CIA press release) about the “secret history” of the war in Ukraine is clearly designed to harden Putin’s resolve. While attempting to blame the Ukraine war’s failure on the erstwhile hero of its own creation (Zelensky) the Times also thoroughly paints two important pictures a) the Biden administration micro managed every detail of what was clearly a proxy war against Russian and b) the US military is a woke-culture crippled shadow of its former glory.

You Can’t Handle The Truth

According to the CEO of National Public Radio, you (the taxpayer, her boss) can’t handle the truth. That is why she takes your tax money and uses it to run 24/7/365 propaganda to manufacture your consent to realities that are created by unelected Globalist interests. A stretch? A joke? Here she is:

Ukraine and Psy Ops

What does Ukraine have to do with Psy Ops fueled by your tax dollars being run on you? Everything. Nobody breaks down the Truman Show nature of today’s American society better than one of the few surviving deans of investigative journalism, Matt Taibbi. All corporate media a) prohibits the types of truth Taibbi specializes in uncovering, and b) constantly puts out the false narratives the truth is buried beneath. Therefore, Taibbi is fully independent. He operates Racket News on the Substack platform, here Racket News. Each week he and journalist/author Walter Kirn put out a broadcast that sums up and analyzes the week’s biggest corporate/deep-state sponsored, psy op snow jobs pulled on the American public. As a means to clear your mind from the fog of continual psy ops, I highly recommend a subscription to Racket News and especially to the weekly broadcast there, This Week in America. In the meantime, here’s Taibbi’s latest piece, providing the receipts on the truth that if you wave the Ukranian flag your mind has been captured with malice aforethought by people who believe Americans are sheep to be manipulated.

Farewell to Volodymyr Zelensky, the GEICO Lizard of the New World Order

Thanking God that the era of mandatory applause for neoliberal mascots is finally over. Can Greta Thunberg come to the White House next?

From the BBC’s “Starmer gives Zelensky ‘full backing’ in warm No 10 welcome” today:

Sir Keir Starmer has told Volodymyr Zelensky he has “full backing across the United Kingdom” as the two met in Downing Street.

The Ukrainian president told the prime minister he was happy his country had “such friends” after arriving in the UK in the wake of a White House meeting with US President Donald Trump that descended into a row between the two leaders…

I read that headline as “Starmer gives Zelensky ‘full backrub,’” which might have been more accurate. The Zelensky World Tour for the last week now includes punking the White House, lecturing America for its insufficient billions, getting yelled at for having “no cards” by a furious Donald Trump (who took offense “on Putin’s behalf,” not the taxpayer’s, according to the New York Times), then instantly backtracking on X and opening the door to a NATO-less solution. Afterward, he fled across the pond to England, where he offered to resign in exchange for NATO admission before dismounting into the arms of Starmer, who eased urgency toward a settlement by pledging to stand with Ukraine “for as long as it may take.”

Zelensky’s transformation from affable populist to Anne Applebaum’s idea of a sex symbol was off-putting even before he started appearing before swooning legislators around the world wearing his trademark wan face and “I Saved The World From Putin and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt” costume. We just spent three years turning a fixable local issue into a test case for a new ethos of imperial intransigence, one that apparently requires constant weeding of unbelievers and full control of media to preserve “democracy.” Zelensky may not have started as a hawk for this global Misinformation is Murder movement, but once he realized selling the idea was a requirement for NATO’s billions, he threw himself into the role with gusto. Now, he’s refusing to give up the part.

Many readers were offended last week by my irreligious attitude toward Ukraine’s president. Those of us who won’t salute this NATO-crafted character actor are apparently “careening into full-on MAGA paranoia,” no better than “comrades” and “fellow travelers” in Vladimir Putin’s figurative if not literal employ. The former comedian is now reprising Ben Kingsley’s Marvin role as the Mandarin, playing tough-guy mascot for transnational bureaucrats whose idea of a good joke is getting Americans to pay to correct their own wrong opinions. Maybe he’s doing what he has to do for his country, but seriously, fuck him. And fuck Starmer, for that matter.

If you’re not offended by the whole affair, you should be. Recapping:

Placed in an impossible situation when Russian forces massed on his border in early 2022, Zelensky at first pursued a strategy of speaking his mind. He criticized Americans for withdrawing diplomats from Kyiv pre-invasion, saying, “We do not have a Titanic situation here.” American officials complained he was “poking us in the eye” with comments that were “mind-boggling,” adding they were “puzzling” over his apparent optimism about a deal with Russia. They preferred he take a different approach, one in line with a new American idea about “information warfare” that didn’t permit local politicians to act like they had a say in how America chose to conduct wars on their territories.

Before Russia invaded, American officials announced in a series of high-profile features in the New York Times that it planned to “beat the master at his own game” by using the press to engage in “information warfare,” claiming it was difficult to go “toe-to-toe with an autocratic state” if the U.S. couldn’t also flood the media zone with untrammeled propaganda. The first target of “information warfare” was said to be Putin. By releasing intelligence in papers like the Times, we were told, he might be stunned by our level of insight into his operations and “reconsider the political, economic and human costs of an invasion.” Pre-invasion, America’s former ambassador to Ukraine even told us the new strategy was working, that “Putin has already blinked” and was now “looking for a way out.”

Tanks rolled anyway three weeks later, after which we were told there was a new target of “information warfare”: ordinary people, including Ukrainians and the foreign populations supporting them. Our leading media outlets now filled with heroic stories of Ukrainian resistance, including the eerily Bastogne-like “Go fuck yourself” tale of Snake Island Ukrainians choosing death over surrender to a Russian warship, or portraits of the mysterious “Ghost of Kyiv,” a MiG-29 fighter pilot who “dominates the skies” with his supersonic “brass balls.” The story was repeated over channels like MSNBC even after it came out that the key images had been stitched together from old Twitter posts and a flight simulator program:

GOOGLE AI Overview:

The “Ghost of Kyiv” is a mythical fighter pilot that some say shot down Russian planes over Kyiv in 2022. The Ukrainian Air Force later acknowledged that the fighter was fictional. 

The Times in pointing out that these stories proved mythical noted they “do not compare to the falsehoods being spread by Russia,” and that it was “important” to “keep morale high among the fighters and marshal global support for their cause.” A senior fellow at the New America Foundation, Peter Singer, said, “If Ukraine had no messages of the righteousness of its cause, the popularity of its cause, the valor of its heroes, the suffering of its populace, then it would lose.” He added that in the social media age, audiences are targets and participants, so sharing such images “makes them combatants of a sort as well.”

We were no longer just readers about the conflict in Ukraine, but a type of soldier in battle. By swallowing tales like the “Ghost of Kyiv,” we were “doing our part,” to put it in Starship Troopers terms. But how to square this with the movement against “misinformation”? First, the Times quoted one “Twitter user” saying, “‘Why can’t we just let people believe some things?’” Then it quoted Twitter, which said such videos didn’t violate its terms of service. Finally, Stanford Internet Observatory director Alex Stamos declared, “I think this demonstrates the limits of ‘fact-checking’ in a fast-moving battle with real lives at stake.”

Things got weirder when the excuses for leaving mythical stories untouched coincided with Europe’s decision to ban RT and Sputnik continent-wide for the crime of “disinformation and information manipulation.” Microsoft, in announcing its adherence to Europe’s decision, echoed other American firms in pledging to stop “state-sponsored disinformation campaigns” bent on “undermining truth.” Most Americans seemed to agree with this decision. Even some once-liberal friends of mine explained in the New Republic that losing RT was no big loss, both because RT was “ridiculous” and because it gave the likes of Tucker Carlson “Russian talking points.”

It wasn’t until a year later that we found out that these events coincided with a broad-scale program in which the Ukrainian secret service, the SBU, sent lists of accounts it wished to ban to the FBI, which in turn sent those requests to American platforms. We thought it was a scoop when a letter from the FBI’s San Francisco office to Twitter asking to remove Canadian journalist Aaron Maté along with hundreds of other accounts was found in the Twitter Files.

That was just one item on a giant conveyor belt of SBU requests to Twitter, Instagram, and other outlets. The House Weaponization of Government Committee later found the SBU induced the FBI to pass on requests to remove 15,865 posts across 5,165 Facebook accounts, and even requested (by mistake, possibly) the removal of the official Russian language Instagram account of the US State Department, @USAPoRusski. When colleague Lee Fang managed to contact Ilya Vitiuk, head of Ukraine’s cybersecurity service, and asked how he differentiated “Russian disinformation” from legitimate content, Vitiuk explained, “I say, ‘Everything that is against our country, consider it a fake, even if it’s not.’”

In April 2023 word broke that an Air National Guardsman named Jack Teixiera was arrested after leaking intelligence documents. These showed internal U.S. assessments calling Ukraine a “catastrophic situation” that was “grinding toward a stalemate” and a “protracted war beyond 2023.” This came out just after Anthony Blinken said Ukraine’s position was “stronger than ever,” Joe Biden said Putin would “never” win, and General Ben Hodges said Ukraine would be liberated by August.

Having established the U.S. may conduct “information warfare” even against its own people, it now arrested Teixiera for interrupting official messaging with truth, and media outlets like the Times and the Washington Post helped authorities catch their own source. Not only did media not report negative news about Ukraine, it helped authorities arrest those who possessed such information.

David Sanger, the Times reporter who helped write the piece introducing “information warfare,” now wrote an article explaining that the “freshness” of the Pentagon Leaker docs made them different from those of Ed Snowden or the Wikileaks cables. It also became common to dismiss any defense of Teixiera or communication of the information he leaked as right-wing propaganda.

Not long after we saw American media shrug off the death in Ukrainian custody of writer and YouTuber Gonzalo Lira. While he was in jail, The Independent set the tone, suggesting the United States should not ask the recipient of billions its aid to free one of its citizens: “An American ‘Putin propagandist’ was jailed in Ukraine. Tucker Carlson and Elon Musk want him freed.” The Daily Beast did better: “How a Sleazy American Dating Coach Became a Pro-Putin Shill in Ukraine.” When Lira died, the headlines featured lines like “Kremlin Shill Died in Ukraine” and “Pro-Putin Expat Dies in Ukrainian Jail.” Ukraine meanwhile banned the World Socialist Web Site and jailed local writer Bogdan Syrotiuk, a cause that didn’t animate the American left much, perhaps because it lacked a Trump angle.

If you’re keeping score, the Ukraine war established American officials could plant deceptions in media as part of “information warfare”; Pro-Ukraine deceptions would be tolerated to maintain “morale”; Russian media was blocked officially in Europe and quasi-officially here; individual posts of Americans were routinely removed or deamplified, sometimes at the behest of Ukraine; and leaks of true information running counter to our own state media narratives would be harshly punished. We banned foreign state media, and essentially mandated fealty to our version at home.

Less formal campaigns denounced anyone who advocated a “diplomatic solution” as a spewer of Russian talking points, on par with the Russian diplomats who were now described as “disinformation warriors.” It did not take much digging to figure out that many Ukrainian news operations denouncing figures like John Mearsheimer or Robert F. Kennedy were funded by the American State Department. The U.S.-Ukraine Foundation that ran a piece saying Kennedy furthered “Russian talking points” had a DOS award, and others with detailed schematics of Ukraine’s informational enemies were done up spiffily by USAID contractors. One is a perfect metaphor for what this war turned into: a way for European contractors to get paid by Americans to correct Americans.

On September 20, 2017, a company called Peregrine Technical Solutions, LLC which specializes in “customized cyber offense and defense,” was awarded $101,917 by the U.S. State Department. The funds were for a transaction described as “ACS CALL CENTER SERVICES — MONTERREY, MEXICO.”

The sub-awards for Peregrine (a company “associated” with other names like Goldbelt and CP Marine) included a $2.43 million outlay for a British firm called “Zinc Network.” That contract featured a similar start date of September 27, 2018, and ran through 2023. Like Peregrine, Zinc is linked to at least three names, including Breakthrough Media and Camden Creative. The description of its award from Peregrine says it aimed to “mitigate the effects of Russian disinformation and engage online audiences primarily in the east of Ukraine by amplifying trusted local voices” to “present a positive, democratic version of a unified Ukraine.”

Following just this one group of contractors reveals the United States spent hundreds of millions of dollars on “social media influence” all over the world. In Ukraine, much of the money went to European middlemen who created dummy Internet personalities to sell the war. They put this in writing! Zinc was obligated $1.23 million from the State Department’s Office of Acquisition Management for two contracts, each of which would “identify, train, and engage 25 to 40 social media influencers” who’d “produce and publish their own social media content in line with U.S. Foreign policy objectives.”

When I called Peregrine, they were shocked to hear a request for a public relations office. The London-based Zinc office seemed similarly unprepared for public inquiry. It’s too bad, because it would be good to know why an American contractor like Peregrine at the outset of a Ukrainian social media campaign needed to hire a call center associated with a U.S. embassy in Mexico. From Zinc, it would be nice to know identities of its social media influencers (did they “engage” Americans?). Also, what did it do for its $500,000 USAID “Pro-Vaccination Campaign” in Georgia, or its $911,613 State Department award for “social media management services for Hindi/Urdu”? What does an “information integrity” services contract entail?

I generally have sympathy for people like Zelensky. The former Soviet Union is a place where success is mostly reserved for men of violence, and anyone outside that club who manages to rise usually needs a big bag of other extraordinary qualities. But this politician allowed his persona to become just another legend “in line with U.S. foreign policy objectives,” forgetting that voters decide what those objectives are, not contractors who don’t answer the phone, or Keir Starmer, or Jens Stoltenberg, or any of a hundred other officials who think they know what wars we must support. I’m tired of being lied to about why this mess can’t get fixed and just want to move on. Is there really anyone left who doesn’t feel the same way?

The Deep State and Scientology

In recent posts – Government Censors Are Losing Their Minds and Elon Musk and the USSA – we described how prominent US citizens have been transformed from corporate media darlings to heinous villains instantly. All they had to do initially was publicly object to deep-state censorship strong arm tactics and begin to peek behind the deep state curtain of Oz.  

This deep state is the creation of and the protector of the American plutocracy. Over the past ten years more concentrated effort has been put into creating an all-powerful plutocratic ruling class than in any other ten-year period in American history.  The new unconstitutional 4th branch of government (the sprawling, permanent bureaucracy or deep state) has actively enforced an unprecedented transfer of wealth from the many to the few. In no commensurate period has income inequality increased so rapidly; have censorship measures been more prevalent; has state propaganda been so dutifully churned out by corporate media; has government control and regulation of powerful corporations (including but not limited to media) been so complete; has the entire justice apparatus been used to hunt down, prosecute and persecute populists designated as domestic enemies of the state. Unfortunately for the younger generations, the level of neo mania (all that matters is the now, modern, and unthinking) is so great they have no frame of reference to even notice such fundamental, repressive changes.

Because of the populist landslide results of the 2024 Presidential election we are likely to learn that all of the maladies above – those indicia of the unquestioned plutocrat hegemony being visited upon us – are not new. Such efforts at smashing the Bill of Rights have been part of the ‘deep state’ agenda for many decades. This could soon become more clear, even if only by Trump’s promised release of the JFK, RFK, and MLK assassination files. The long duration of this erosion of rights is not understood by many. That in part is due to the neo-maniacal trend in this society. That is all attention by the plutocracy is driven to the present and ever-present future “threats”; the idea being to keep people distracted and unaware of the gradual erosion of their rights. In order to overcome the Orwellian neo-maniacal erasure of history from the collective consciousness, some study of history is in order. 

One history I am intimately familiar with is that of the relationship between the church of Scientology and the US deep-security state. It so happens that that history provides a helpful backdrop against which to better appreciate the recent Bill of Rights cancellation craze in America. Virtually all tactics we are witnessing of late have been applied with force and passion against Scientology for several decades.

Scientology’s founder L. Ron Hubbard came into American consciousness in 1950 with his bestselling book Dianetics; The Modern Science of Mental Health. It was a handbook for regular people to straighten out their own minds and lives through a prescribed self-help regimen. Prior to Dianetics, regression type therapy (that is, resolving one’s past through revisiting it) was practiced mainly under the auspices of the government (to wit, WW II PTSD cases) and almost always with the ‘aid’ of mind-altering drugs. Hubbard introduced the idea of freeing the mind without the use of drugs, which he viewed as exacerbating the conditions meant to be relieved. He was immediately set upon by the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, The American Psychological Association, The Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Association, the Food and Drug Administration and virtually every federal law enforcement and intelligence agency. It took several decades of liberal use of Freedom of Information laws and coast to coast litigation in order to a) survive the attacks and b) learn of its extraordinary extent and intensity.

Paradoxically, the hundreds of thousands of subsequently revealed documents were really unnecessary to understanding why Ron Hubbard seemed to pose such an earth-shaking threat to the keepers of America’s deepest, dark secrets.  Instead, a short passage in Hubbard’s second major book on the mind told one all he needed to know about why the deep, security state mustered all its forces against him.

In 1951 Hubbard’s Science of Survival: The Prediction of Human Behavior hit the market. The book expanded on Dianetics counselling techniques and provided a manual for predicting human behavior. In the course of doing so, Hubbard revealed something that – in spite of his efforts – the world at large would remain ignorant of for more than two decades.  

The offending passage:

There is another form of hypnotism which falls between the surgical operation and straight hypnotism without physical pain. This form of hypnotism has been a carefully guarded secret of certain military and intelligence organizations. It is a vicious war weapon and may be of considerable more use in conquering a society than the atom bomb. This is no exaggeration. The extensiveness of the use of this form of hypnotism in espionage work is so wide today that it is long past the time when people should have become alarmed about it. 

It required Dianetic processing to uncover “pain-drug-hypnosis.”  Otherwise pain-drug-hypnosis was out of sight, unsuspected and unknown.

Hubbard claimed that agents of the agencies so exposed made attempts on his life later in 1951.  Their methods of course made proving such impossible. And the public brushed it off since the leading lights of American corporate media (including Time Magazine, the New York Times and CBS) went to extraordinary lengths at the behest of their deep-security state masters attempting to paint Hubbard in as unfavorable a light as possible.

In fact, it was not until the mid-1970s that Pain-drug-hypnosis (PDH) received any significant attention. That was when Senator Frank Church’s Intelligence Oversight Congressional Committee probed the dirty work of the CIA. That committee (and subsequent Congressional investigations) released documents and testimony proving that what L. Ron Hubbard stated as fact in 1951 was indeed irrefutable fact. The Church committee revealed that at the time (1951) of Hubbard’s revelations US Naval Intelligence and the CIA had been working for at least eight years on enhancing interrogation and torture techniques with drugs and hypnosis. In the early 50’s the CIA formally took the lead in all such operations under the rubric MK (Mind Control) Ultra.  1952 documents labelled Project Bluebird, a part of MK Ultra, spelled out the aims of their then ongoing experimentation with PDH:

“Can we obtain control of the future activities (physical and mental) of any given individual, willing or unwilling by application of SI (sensory isolation) and H (hypnosis) techniques?”

“Can we in a matter of an hour, two hours, one day, etc., induce an H (hypnotic) condition in an unwilling subject to such an extent that he will perform an act for our benefit? (long range)”

“Can we create by post-H (hypnotic) suggestion an action contrary to an individual’s basic moral principals?” 

“Can we devise a system for making unwilling subjects into willing agents and then transfer that control to untrained agency agents in the field by use of codes or identifying signs or credentials?”

“Can we obtain control of the future activities (physical and mental) of any individual, willing or unwilling with a guarantee of amnesia?”

“Can an individual be made to perform an act of attempted assassination?”

And finally, for some comedic relief, the CIA asked a question indicating their Keystone Kops level of incompetence:

“Can we detect SI and H by use of SI an H (regression)?”

Link to original CIA document

As noted above L. Ron Hubbard had already been regularly ‘detecting’ SI and H (or pdh) through the decidedly drug and hypnosis free Dianetics. He’d even published the fact in a widely distributed book – and their own agency along with several others were pursuing Hubbard with considerable resources and ardor for having done so. I personally have so detected and uncovered SI and H (and PDH) application – along with relieving the damage originally done – by use of Dianetics and Scientology techniques. 

Hubbard’s 1951 revelation would make him and his creation Scientology a “national security risk”, a priority target for discrediting and destruction by the government-friendly corporate media and numerous federal agencies.

While having some measure of success in getting the public to disbelieve such claims, they failed to stop Hubbard and his techniques. He and Scientology became long-terms targets of what we today call a “whole of society” approach to undermining Hubbard and his work. That is numerous federal agencies set out to frame and prosecute Hubbard and Scientology by any means necessary, all flanked by coordinating smears by corporate media and non-governmental organizations such as the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Association, and the American Medical Association. Having been a front-line defender against such techniques for years, I too was targeted by a US Department of Justice FBI sting operation. When confronted with Freedom of Information Act documents proving the attempted frame up, the FBI agent in charge sheepishly admitted, “we tried our best, but you didn’t take the bait.”

The anti-Hubbard/Scientology propaganda campaign required authoritative figures to provide the ‘proof’ of their smears. Who were the leading lights utilized to smash Hubbard and Scientology? The heads of the American Psychiatric Association and the World Psychiatric Association. They and their minions presented themselves as the preeminent experts on ‘Mind Control”.  They testified publicly in the media, legally in courts and parliaments, doing everything possible to make Hubbard appear disreputable and to position Scientology as a “cult.” Their expertise was accepted and forwarded by literally every corporate media outlet and every intelligence and law enforcement agency in the western world. For forty years.

After all these decades later, after much smoke has cleared, after many relevant characters have long since passed and their papers became available, and tomes of classified government files have lost their classified status, let’s revisit who the authorities on Mind Control Cults  – and the basis of their authority – were. In short, they were the epitome of the APA affliction known as “projection” (that is accusing others of your own sordid intentions and actions). 

Dr. Winfred Overholser was the first ‘authority’ to strike out at Hubbard. Overholser was President of the APA 1947-48.  Decades of research were required to finally prove that from 1949 through the early fifties, L. Ron Hubbard and his Dianetics presented a clear and present danger to Overholser personally. Just after Overholser’s stint as APA President Hubbard presented Dianetics to a group of psychiatrists at the Overholser-led Washington D.C.  St Elizabeth Hospital. Hospital psychiatrists there eagerly adopted Dianetics methods as they experienced initial success. That was only until Overholser caught wind of it. He prohibited its use and denounced Hubbard and his techniques as a “fraud.”  That would be its original, official branding. Why was Oversholser so intolerant in the face of his underlings’ successes? Decades later it was learned that throughout the forties and fifties Oversholser was experimenting on unwitting patient-victims with LSD, electroshock treatment and hypnosis (yes, PDH) at St Elizabeth’s. Oversholser was one of the founding CIA shock/torture doctors furthering Mind Control experiments in America; the same line of experiments begun in Nazi Germany under the infamous Dr. Joseph Mengele. 

Dr. Ewen Cameron was an Overholser successor as  President of the American Psychiatric Association during the critical years 1952-1953, a year after Hubbard published his expose on government Pain-Drug-Hypnosis practices. They were also the same years the CIA formalized years of such practices under the rubric MK Ultra (Mind Control Ultra); the program quoted from above. Those were also the years when the APA became the lead grand inquisitor against Hubbard and Scientology, a duty it carried out for another 30 years, until the APA’s condemnation became more like a badge of honor as far as decent people were concerned. Cameron was also the head of the World Psychiatric Association from 1961-67, the years it worked hand-in-glove with the CIA to instigate attempted bannings of Scientology internationally, from the U.K. to Australia.

 What we learned from the 70s (from the Church Committee, and subsequent committee, hearings) to the present is that Cameron was a leading MK Ultra experimenter throughout the 1950’s and 1960’s.  He was in direct communication with MK Ultra’s American Mengele, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, poisoner and torturer in Chief of the CIA.  The most thorough treatment on the sinister nature of the mass tortures Cameron personally performed and directed can be found in Naomi Klein’s best-selling book The Shock Doctrine (2007, Knopf Canada). After exhaustive research from extensive Freedom of Information Act releases over thirty years, Ms. Klein demonstrated with ample fact references that while Cameron’s organization was condemning Hubbard and Scientology for alleged “mind control” Cameron himself was regularly drugging, poisoning, electroshocking, erasing the memories of, planting false memories in, and implanting commands into the brains of hundreds of unwitting human guinea pigs. Cameron’s victims were drugged beyond consciousness without their consent and then tortured and hypnotized, some for months on end. All hidden behind the cloak of the literal head of national and international institutions responsible for the betterment of human mental health. That is what made him an “expert” on Mind Control.

This is only the beginning of a story that would defy belief for many decades – until sufficient documentation could finally be obtained to prove it. Hopefully, it gives you some context from which to process the mind-numbing attacks, nullifications, brandings, and targeting being meted out by the deep state/corporate media cartel of late (witness Trump, Musk, Patel, RFK Jr, Tulsi Gabbard, to name a few).  There is more TO THE SCIENTOLOGY STORY. And at least one of the central characters makes Overholser and Cameron look like choir boys by comparison.

CBS – Censorship Broadcasting Network

You probably didn’t see it in the news if you are reliant on deep-state controlled corporate media (and their hundreds of dependent feeds such as Apple News, Yahoo News, AOL news, MSN, etc). Our Vice President just lowered the boom on an alarmingly authoritarianism headed Europe. He let them know that America would no longer be participating in or supporting ANTI-FREE SPEECH CENSORSHIP. Here is the original. Watch the whole thing if you care about YOUR future right to freedom of speech, expression and of the press:

Predictably, the deep state-controlled US corporate media came out with long-knives to stab Vance right in the back. The New York Times headlined “Vance uses half-truths to lecture a European audience well aware of the threat of authoritarian rule“. CNN headlined “JD VANCE TELLS EUROPEANS STOP SHUNNING PARTY DEEMED EXTREME”. CBS (variously known as Censorship Broadcasting Service and Communist Broadcasting Service because of its continually leading the charge with ANTI-AMERICAN attacks on anyone promoting American values) took it several steps further.

First, its Sunday morning talking head actually tried to foist off on the American people that Adolph Hitler was driven and empowered by ‘free speech’ to execute the holocaust. Fortunately, Secretary of State Rubio was alert enough to correct her on the spot.

On the same day CBS doubled down with a 60 Minutes puff piece promoting current German authoritarian censorship extremism. Here is a clip with the comments of the Vice President persisting in countering the promotion of cancellation of the Bill of Rights:

Your Mind Has Been Captured

If you principally rely upon corporate media (including its hundreds of spin off sites from yahoonews, to msn, to AOL news, to Apple news who primarily regurgitate them) to inform your views of the world, your mind is not your own. Your mind has been captured. Your mind is captive.

The proof of that is contained in this post.

Yesterday one of the most consequential and powerful congressional committees, the House Judiciary Committee, held a hearing. It highlighted unrefuted documentation and testimony that your tax dollars have been used to force corporate media to interfere in U.S. Presidential elections, target and frame a sitting President for impeachment, and otherwise run continuous psy ops directed at you and your family through the corporate media.  Here is a very short highlight of the type of matter examined:

Now, go find this in your corporate media (and/or dependent spin offs) of choice. It isn’t there. Instead, you will find wall to wall nasty attacks (including incitements to violence and assassination) on those who are bringing this evidence to light.

And even if you attempt to escape the madness through ‘comedy’ every network late-night host will implant you with the same mind numbing, government issued distractions.

Wake up. 

Elon Musk and the USSA

reference: Government Censors Are Losing Their Minds

First, USSA stands for what has become of America over the past thirty years of leftist grooming of a new fourth – and most powerful – branch of government: the federal bureaucracy. United Socialist States of America: USSA.  As we have witnessed over the past three weeks, its purpose seems totalitarian in nature. That purpose has become stark of late: resisting all expressed intentions of the electorate. In other words, acting as the avowed enemy of DEMOCRACY; all while projecting on its critics the title “threats to democracy.” USSA’s lapdog corporate media has degenerated into a cesspool of senseless, baseless, and ill-intended smears against the most high profile representatives of the people’s will to return the USSA to the United States of America. 

What has this got to do with Elon Musk? He was advertised by President Trump to be his planned appointee to spearhead the dismantling of unconstitutional, national bankruptcy creating, populace stifling federal institutional power responsible for bringing America to its knees. In other words restoring the USSA to the USA. The populace overwhelmingly voted for just that. (taking into consideration the unprecedented levels of illegal alien ballot stuffing, the margin of victory for Trump in 2024 was also unprecedented). 

You might have expected the media to promote that role and its agenda. After all, less than four years ago the corporate media characterized Elon Musk as literally a super hero, a messiah, a Midas, a prophet and the Edison of our times. Here that is in black and white:

“Elon Musk, the real-life Tony Stark, is not just building electric cars or reusable rockets; he’s engineering the future itself.” – Time Magazine, 2021

“The world’s richest man is also its most visionary, a genius who dreams of Mars while revolutionizing Earth.” – The New York Times, 2020

“Musk is the Edison of our time, a titan of industry whose innovations will save humanity.” – CNN, 2019

“From Tesla to SpaceX, Elon Musk is the golden child of tech, a Midas whose every touch turns to progress.” – Forbes, 2021

“He’s not just a CEO; he’s a messiah for the tech age, leading us to a sustainable, multi-planetary utopia.” – The Guardian, 2020

CNN: “Elon Musk is the Edison of our time, a titan of industry whose innovations will save humanity.” – 2019

Bloomberg: “Elon Musk, the billionaire dreamer, is reshaping industries from cars to space, a modern-day Icarus who soars ever closer to the sun.” – 2021

The Wall Street Journal: “Musk’s vision is nothing short of biblical: a man who builds arks for Earth and beyond, a prophet of profit and progress.” – 2020

While continuing to do all that Musk was hailed for, he also restored the First Amendment to America by purchasing (at a tremendous personal loss) the most important social media platform in the world. In taking control of that entity, he exposed the USSA’s propaganda and censorship efforts through that vehicle, and restored the 1st Amendment’s freedom of speech and press by reform of the platform. That is what soured the propaganda and censorship dependent USSA.  From CNN to Washington Post, from New York Times to CBS, the corporate media started characterizing the greatest agent of restoration of democracy as a “threat to democracy.”  Despite industrial scale, coordinated corporate media smearing – only ever surpassed by what they did to Trump – the American public voted in November to have Trump bring in Musk to reform the United States Government like he had with what he turned into the most important news vehicle on the planet (X, formerly known as Twitter). 

Within a week, Musk had exposed literally trillions of dollars of taxpayer monies not only being wasted but also being used to fund programs inimical to the interests of those paying taxes.  See e.g. USAID, CIA, and the Truman Show Revealed.

His mission was made pre-school simple and clarion clear pre-election and post-election. For example:

And yet now, corporate media has become one gigantic cacophony – from CBS to CNN, from Washington Post to New York Times, from Time Magazine to Bloomberg – claiming the man they tried to convince us was the actual second coming instead is worse than a Russian Oligarch, Hitler actually.

You cannot distrust the corporate media and its USSA masters enough. The closer their gig comes to ending the more violently insane they become. 

USAID, CIA and the Truman Show revealed

Reference: The Battle For Your Mind Is On

More on USAID, the CIA black ops and DNC grift bank, that spends a great deal of your tax money on evil and waste. Yeah, the audit of which leading democrats are attempting to cause an insurrection over.

From Mike Benz, today’s foremost whistleblower/researcher on government corruption:

Before you look at the next one, reminder. Politico was the “news” outlet that Joe Biden’s people chose to release the phony-CIA-created story that the Hunter Biden laptop (documenting Biden’s multi million dollar grift in the pay of the Chinese and Ukrainians) was a creation of Russian intelligence:

and this…

For particulars on the atrocious nature of the waste (and destruction caused by) of your taxpayer dollars see the full post remarked on here:

Senator Mike Lee weighs in on why USAID is giving 68 Million US taxpayer dollars to a group of plutocrat globalists in Switzerland:

Even spending on election rigging – ala communist autocracy:

Are you seeing much of these facts in your corporate media coverage of numbskull, corrupt politicians screaming that the end of the world is neigh because we are finally going to get a US government audit? Of course not, your taxpayer dollars are going toward paying corporate media NOT to show you the facts. Here is what corporate media is showing vs. what they didn’t show you during the last three major, mishandled natural disasters:

Here’s another take on the reason corporate media is keeping its cult following in the dark:

And they are still trying to write off RFK Jr as a ‘conspiracy theorist.’ We now have the receipts.