Tag Archives: scientology

Going Clear, Part 12 – IRS and religion invention

Going Clear, Part 12 summary

Wright invents the ‘fact’ that the IRS in 1992 settlement negotiations was making a determination of whether or not Scientology was a religion, a task he adjudicates the IRS was ‘ill-equipped’ to do.  Rathbun, recounts how he had explicitly, long prior to publication, demonstrated to Wright that his was not only not the case, but could not be the case.  Scientology had won that determination in court in 1967, after years of the IRS attempting to challenge it.  Since then, Rathbun told Wright, dozens of courts had reconfirmed that finding. It was such settled law that even the IRS wanted to make such an adjudication in 1992 they were powerless to do so.  Yet, Wright alleges the “unqualified” IRS set out to do so in 1982.

Going Clear, Part 11- IRS, fraudulent deceptions

Going Clear, Part 11 summary

Wrights weaves an invention-laden narrative that is false in sum and substance about Scientology’s history vis a vis the Internal Revenue service.  Wright literally invents the origin of the problem with the IRS – an event that Rathbun demonstrates never occurred and could not have occurred. Wright lies about the Church’s alleged IRS liabilities.  Based on these two inventions Wright dramatically concludes “The Founder had placed Scientology’s head on the executioner’s block.”  Rathbun notes, “he literally invented two statements and then from them invented a conclusion.”  Wright was informed that his misinformation that the church investigated the private lives of IRS agents was false, yet he published it anyway – with no source. His only source said it didn’t happen and he published it anyway.  Rathbun details a dozen facts that Wright was informed were incorrect, yet Wright published anyway.

Going Clear, Part 10 – Cult Awareness Network

Going Clear, Part 10 summary

Cult Awareness Network.  Wright laments Cult Awareness Network being sued by individual Scientologists.  But, he intentionally omits the substance of those suits. “The substance of it was that the Cult Awareness Network was being used literally as an arm of the Internal Revenue Service to investigate Scientology and Scientologists.”  Cult Awareness Network (CAN) was serving as a propaganda arm for the IRS. And they were doing all this while enjoying tax exemption. But, by law they were required to present both sides of issues, in order to qualify as an exempt educational organization.  The lawsuits were brought after Cult Awareness Network denied Scientologists membership in order to provide the other side of the Scientology story. “Not only would it refused to be balanced, they wouldn’t even let somebody participate who would provide the balance.”  The lawsuits were meritorious under civil rights principles which CAN refused to abide. So, Wright forwards his propaganda by falsely promoting an anti-Scientology propaganda organization.

Going Clear, Part 8 Questionable Sources

Going Clear, Part 8:  Questionable Sources

Wright indicts and convicts L. Ron Hubbard and David Miscavige at the ages of 12 years old. Literally, Wright goes back that far to invent episodes in their lives to attack their characters.  In the case of Miscavige, Wright spent 4 pages utilizing a source lacking credibility to accuse Miscavige of something that allegedly occurred 40 years earlier, making Miscavige 12 years old. Rathbun provides first-hand information that demonstrates the witness to lack credibility.  Write takes innuendo, muses about, turning it into fact during the process.

Going Clear, Part 6

Going Clear, Part 6 summary: Australian Inquiry

Rathbun demonstrates how Wright ignored hard evidence in order to legitimatize what other journalists (none favorable to Scientology) described as a “witch hunt” and “kangaroo court” Inquiry into Scientology by the Australia parliament in the early sixties.  Wright reduces the fact of the Inquiry being instigated by slanderous material from US governments agencies by referring to it as an alleged delusory “belief” on the part of L. Ron Hubbard. Rathbun recounts how he went through a detailed account with Wright proving that the spreading of slanderous by the US government to the Australians was documented fact. 

Going Clear, Part 5 Dishonest Editing

Going Clear, Part 5 summary:

After establishing that 80% of L. Ron Hubbard’s time is accounted for when one reviews the magnitude and content of his thousands of lectures (Going Clear Part 2), Rathbun then examines Wright’s only significant quotation from those lectures. Rathbun demonstrates with the actual transcripts quoted that Wright liberally misquoted, mixed up the sequence of sentences so as to change meaning to smear Hubbard. Rathbun shows how Wright’s quoted passage omitted fully more than half of the text to make the lecture seem disjointed and non-sequitur. Rathbun produces the transcript and demonstrates with highlight pen the violence Wright commits against Hubbard’s words in order to put him in a bad light.  Wright even invents the ”point” that Hubbard was allegedly trying to make.  Rathbun demonstrates that invented point was very evidently NOT the point, the invented non-sequitur that Wright alleges. 

Going Clear, Part 3 Wright’s Cultic Practices

Going Clear, Part 3 summary:

Wright accuses Scientology of thought stopping – a form of mind control censorship.  However, “By the time you get 3 or 4 chapters into Going Clear, he is effectively applying that to his readers…By then he has already labelled the founder “delusional, imaginary.”  So, from that point forward there can be no “scientology side” presented, since they are already referred to as “delusional, imaginary.” 

Wright uses a sophistry that is based on the “us vs. them” and thought stopping techniques he has employed.  That is, conclusions and subjective opinions of Scientology haters become logical and any subjective viewpoint from Scientologists becomes illogical.  To do so, Wright ignores any discrediting information about any anti-Scientology source, yet immediately treats a gospel any opinion or subjective slur against Scientology as fact. 

The fact alteration is remarkable in the favor the anti Scientologist.  Rathbun points out the protagonist Paul Haggis said by Wright to have come into Scientology “wanting to be a writer.”  In the movie – which Wright produces and carefully edited – Haggis said “he wanted to be a documentary film maker.”  He tells the writer he wanted to be a writer; he tells the film maker he wanted to be a film maker.  Instead of pointing out the manipulative, dishonest fellow is, Wright lets him have it both ways; because, “hey, who is going fact check and attack on scientology?” 

Introduction

BLACKMAIL

 

I felt like I was pretty much done with the ASC (Anti-Scientology Cult) awareness-education business after the post How Gullible Can One Get?  However, within a couple of days of publication I received a blackmail threat from ASC headquarters (from ASC royalty in fact).  The demand requires me to shut down the exposure of facts and thoughts I have been sharing of late on this blog. The threat was that if I continue on that subject line my most well-concealed, secret crimes will be exposed.

Those crimes were characterized as fitting the bill of what Jeff Hawkins authoritatively spoke of in My Scientology Movie. Hawkins appears there stating with an air of grave profundity, paraphrased, “Rathbun has definitely not told all; he knows where all the bodies are buried.”

While I consider whether to cave and muzzle myself as ordered or to stand and carry on with exposing hypocrisy, I thought it would help to have the ASC rank and file weigh in. I have attracted scores of ASC trolls in the past couple of months, and discussion of my posts have dominated ASC comment-message threads. Now the followers have the opportunity to contribute something meaningful to their cause.

All they have to do in order to participate is pass a pre-school level cognitive-coordination challenge. This poll is going to be a test of their attention span, self-discipline, and motor-skills faculties. That is, they can weigh in with one word, either “cave” which means stfu (and every other unkind thought they feel compelled to hurl my way) or they can say “stand” which means “go ahead and express yourself.”  You must go by your regular cyber cult handle. That way ASC leadership (the blackmailers) knows exactly where you stand. It also allows us to see which of those who regularly read here and comment on me elsewhere have the nerve to defy ASC leadership standing orders not to read and discuss my posts anymore.

I anxiously await ASC input so that I may complete this most nerve-racking decision-making process.

How Gullible Can One Get?

 

It came to my attention that some fellow gave a youtube lecture about what he called a conflict between Tony Ortega and me. When I went to the video I saw a man calling himself Chris Shelton ‘critical thinker at large.’ It would be difficult to imagine more inflated airs of self-absorbed arrogance than this fellow manages to put on; nor a mind as infected with hive-mentality.

Mr. Shelton claims in the video not to know anything about what went down behind the scenes in the terminations of Monique Rathbun’s lawyers and lawsuit – delivered with a tongue-in-cheek smirk. But, he comes to the authoritative conclusion that I have somehow overreacted to Ortega’s four-month campaign smearing my wife and me over the issue. He concludes it is a function of the damaged former Scientologist mind – a syndrome he claims to be an expert in.

I learned that before these broadcasted profundities Shelton was making the ASC (Anti-Scientology Cult) rounds swearing people to secrecy before giving them the ‘real story’ behind the terminations. He swore the story was obtained straight from Monique’s former lawyer’s mouth. Shelton’s rumor-monger account – if believed – would mean that either Tony Ortega made up and published quotes attributed to Ray Jeffrey about his former client, or that Ray Jeffrey simply lied like a flatfish throughout his ‘exclusive’ Ortega interview. That would be the ‘Quiz Street’ interview where Jeffrey swore he did not have a clue as to which way was up.

Between Ortega’s plethora of claims as to ‘inside knowledge’ and then Shelton’s, it seems they would like the ASC krew to believe that Jeffrey is more like Perez Hilton than Perry Mason.

In either event, it demonstrates that Shelton at best is not playing with a full deck. He delivers psych analyses giving knowingly false premises to support his damning conclusions.

Looking further into Shelton’s gig I learned something remarkable. He has posted dozens of videos pontificating about the damaged minds of Scientologists (current and former). They are delivered with the self-sure authority of an Ivy League shrink.  Paradoxically, Shelton’s principle support for putting out his mass psychiatric diagnoses comes from someone who purports to deliver Scientology services at the highest level of proficiency. Shelton’s benefactor also pays Tony Ortega to, among other things, regularly post Shelton’s ramblings at The Underground Bunker.

More remarkable is that some former Scientologists actually pass around Shelton’s mental-deficiency diagnoses of themselves. Brain dead, and damn proud of it.