Tag Archives: l. ron hubbard

The Deep State and Scientology

In recent posts – Government Censors Are Losing Their Minds and Elon Musk and the USSA – we described how prominent US citizens have been transformed from corporate media darlings to heinous villains instantly. All they had to do initially was publicly object to deep-state censorship strong arm tactics and begin to peek behind the deep state curtain of Oz.  

This deep state is the creation of and the protector of the American plutocracy. Over the past ten years more concentrated effort has been put into creating an all-powerful plutocratic ruling class than in any other ten-year period in American history.  The new unconstitutional 4th branch of government (the sprawling, permanent bureaucracy or deep state) has actively enforced an unprecedented transfer of wealth from the many to the few. In no commensurate period has income inequality increased so rapidly; have censorship measures been more prevalent; has state propaganda been so dutifully churned out by corporate media; has government control and regulation of powerful corporations (including but not limited to media) been so complete; has the entire justice apparatus been used to hunt down, prosecute and persecute populists designated as domestic enemies of the state. Unfortunately for the younger generations, the level of neo mania (all that matters is the now, modern, and unthinking) is so great they have no frame of reference to even notice such fundamental, repressive changes.

Because of the populist landslide results of the 2024 Presidential election we are likely to learn that all of the maladies above – those indicia of the unquestioned plutocrat hegemony being visited upon us – are not new. Such efforts at smashing the Bill of Rights have been part of the ‘deep state’ agenda for many decades. This could soon become more clear, even if only by Trump’s promised release of the JFK, RFK, and MLK assassination files. The long duration of this erosion of rights is not understood by many. That in part is due to the neo-maniacal trend in this society. That is all attention by the plutocracy is driven to the present and ever-present future “threats”; the idea being to keep people distracted and unaware of the gradual erosion of their rights. In order to overcome the Orwellian neo-maniacal erasure of history from the collective consciousness, some study of history is in order. 

One history I am intimately familiar with is that of the relationship between the church of Scientology and the US deep-security state. It so happens that that history provides a helpful backdrop against which to better appreciate the recent Bill of Rights cancellation craze in America. Virtually all tactics we are witnessing of late have been applied with force and passion against Scientology for several decades.

Scientology’s founder L. Ron Hubbard came into American consciousness in 1950 with his bestselling book Dianetics; The Modern Science of Mental Health. It was a handbook for regular people to straighten out their own minds and lives through a prescribed self-help regimen. Prior to Dianetics, regression type therapy (that is, resolving one’s past through revisiting it) was practiced mainly under the auspices of the government (to wit, WW II PTSD cases) and almost always with the ‘aid’ of mind-altering drugs. Hubbard introduced the idea of freeing the mind without the use of drugs, which he viewed as exacerbating the conditions meant to be relieved. He was immediately set upon by the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, The American Psychological Association, The Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Association, the Food and Drug Administration and virtually every federal law enforcement and intelligence agency. It took several decades of liberal use of Freedom of Information laws and coast to coast litigation in order to a) survive the attacks and b) learn of its extraordinary extent and intensity.

Paradoxically, the hundreds of thousands of subsequently revealed documents were really unnecessary to understanding why Ron Hubbard seemed to pose such an earth-shaking threat to the keepers of America’s deepest, dark secrets.  Instead, a short passage in Hubbard’s second major book on the mind told one all he needed to know about why the deep, security state mustered all its forces against him.

In 1951 Hubbard’s Science of Survival: The Prediction of Human Behavior hit the market. The book expanded on Dianetics counselling techniques and provided a manual for predicting human behavior. In the course of doing so, Hubbard revealed something that – in spite of his efforts – the world at large would remain ignorant of for more than two decades.  

The offending passage:

There is another form of hypnotism which falls between the surgical operation and straight hypnotism without physical pain. This form of hypnotism has been a carefully guarded secret of certain military and intelligence organizations. It is a vicious war weapon and may be of considerable more use in conquering a society than the atom bomb. This is no exaggeration. The extensiveness of the use of this form of hypnotism in espionage work is so wide today that it is long past the time when people should have become alarmed about it. 

It required Dianetic processing to uncover “pain-drug-hypnosis.”  Otherwise pain-drug-hypnosis was out of sight, unsuspected and unknown.

Hubbard claimed that agents of the agencies so exposed made attempts on his life later in 1951.  Their methods of course made proving such impossible. And the public brushed it off since the leading lights of American corporate media (including Time Magazine, the New York Times and CBS) went to extraordinary lengths at the behest of their deep-security state masters attempting to paint Hubbard in as unfavorable a light as possible.

In fact, it was not until the mid-1970s that Pain-drug-hypnosis (PDH) received any significant attention. That was when Senator Frank Church’s Intelligence Oversight Congressional Committee probed the dirty work of the CIA. That committee (and subsequent Congressional investigations) released documents and testimony proving that what L. Ron Hubbard stated as fact in 1951 was indeed irrefutable fact. The Church committee revealed that at the time (1951) of Hubbard’s revelations US Naval Intelligence and the CIA had been working for at least eight years on enhancing interrogation and torture techniques with drugs and hypnosis. In the early 50’s the CIA formally took the lead in all such operations under the rubric MK (Mind Control) Ultra.  1952 documents labelled Project Bluebird, a part of MK Ultra, spelled out the aims of their then ongoing experimentation with PDH:

“Can we obtain control of the future activities (physical and mental) of any given individual, willing or unwilling by application of SI (sensory isolation) and H (hypnosis) techniques?”

“Can we in a matter of an hour, two hours, one day, etc., induce an H (hypnotic) condition in an unwilling subject to such an extent that he will perform an act for our benefit? (long range)”

“Can we create by post-H (hypnotic) suggestion an action contrary to an individual’s basic moral principals?” 

“Can we devise a system for making unwilling subjects into willing agents and then transfer that control to untrained agency agents in the field by use of codes or identifying signs or credentials?”

“Can we obtain control of the future activities (physical and mental) of any individual, willing or unwilling with a guarantee of amnesia?”

“Can an individual be made to perform an act of attempted assassination?”

And finally, for some comedic relief, the CIA asked a question indicating their Keystone Kops level of incompetence:

“Can we detect SI and H by use of SI an H (regression)?”

Link to original CIA document

As noted above L. Ron Hubbard had already been regularly ‘detecting’ SI and H (or pdh) through the decidedly drug and hypnosis free Dianetics. He’d even published the fact in a widely distributed book – and their own agency along with several others were pursuing Hubbard with considerable resources and ardor for having done so. I personally have so detected and uncovered SI and H (and PDH) application – along with relieving the damage originally done – by use of Dianetics and Scientology techniques. 

Hubbard’s 1951 revelation would make him and his creation Scientology a “national security risk”, a priority target for discrediting and destruction by the government-friendly corporate media and numerous federal agencies.

While having some measure of success in getting the public to disbelieve such claims, they failed to stop Hubbard and his techniques. He and Scientology became long-terms targets of what we today call a “whole of society” approach to undermining Hubbard and his work. That is numerous federal agencies set out to frame and prosecute Hubbard and Scientology by any means necessary, all flanked by coordinating smears by corporate media and non-governmental organizations such as the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Association, and the American Medical Association. Having been a front-line defender against such techniques for years, I too was targeted by a US Department of Justice FBI sting operation. When confronted with Freedom of Information Act documents proving the attempted frame up, the FBI agent in charge sheepishly admitted, “we tried our best, but you didn’t take the bait.”

The anti-Hubbard/Scientology propaganda campaign required authoritative figures to provide the ‘proof’ of their smears. Who were the leading lights utilized to smash Hubbard and Scientology? The heads of the American Psychiatric Association and the World Psychiatric Association. They and their minions presented themselves as the preeminent experts on ‘Mind Control”.  They testified publicly in the media, legally in courts and parliaments, doing everything possible to make Hubbard appear disreputable and to position Scientology as a “cult.” Their expertise was accepted and forwarded by literally every corporate media outlet and every intelligence and law enforcement agency in the western world. For forty years.

After all these decades later, after much smoke has cleared, after many relevant characters have long since passed and their papers became available, and tomes of classified government files have lost their classified status, let’s revisit who the authorities on Mind Control Cults  – and the basis of their authority – were. In short, they were the epitome of the APA affliction known as “projection” (that is accusing others of your own sordid intentions and actions). 

Dr. Winfred Overholser was the first ‘authority’ to strike out at Hubbard. Overholser was President of the APA 1947-48.  Decades of research were required to finally prove that from 1949 through the early fifties, L. Ron Hubbard and his Dianetics presented a clear and present danger to Overholser personally. Just after Overholser’s stint as APA President Hubbard presented Dianetics to a group of psychiatrists at the Overholser-led Washington D.C.  St Elizabeth Hospital. Hospital psychiatrists there eagerly adopted Dianetics methods as they experienced initial success. That was only until Overholser caught wind of it. He prohibited its use and denounced Hubbard and his techniques as a “fraud.”  That would be its original, official branding. Why was Oversholser so intolerant in the face of his underlings’ successes? Decades later it was learned that throughout the forties and fifties Oversholser was experimenting on unwitting patient-victims with LSD, electroshock treatment and hypnosis (yes, PDH) at St Elizabeth’s. Oversholser was one of the founding CIA shock/torture doctors furthering Mind Control experiments in America; the same line of experiments begun in Nazi Germany under the infamous Dr. Joseph Mengele. 

Dr. Ewen Cameron was an Overholser successor as  President of the American Psychiatric Association during the critical years 1952-1953, a year after Hubbard published his expose on government Pain-Drug-Hypnosis practices. They were also the same years the CIA formalized years of such practices under the rubric MK Ultra (Mind Control Ultra); the program quoted from above. Those were also the years when the APA became the lead grand inquisitor against Hubbard and Scientology, a duty it carried out for another 30 years, until the APA’s condemnation became more like a badge of honor as far as decent people were concerned. Cameron was also the head of the World Psychiatric Association from 1961-67, the years it worked hand-in-glove with the CIA to instigate attempted bannings of Scientology internationally, from the U.K. to Australia.

 What we learned from the 70s (from the Church Committee, and subsequent committee, hearings) to the present is that Cameron was a leading MK Ultra experimenter throughout the 1950’s and 1960’s.  He was in direct communication with MK Ultra’s American Mengele, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, poisoner and torturer in Chief of the CIA.  The most thorough treatment on the sinister nature of the mass tortures Cameron personally performed and directed can be found in Naomi Klein’s best-selling book The Shock Doctrine (2007, Knopf Canada). After exhaustive research from extensive Freedom of Information Act releases over thirty years, Ms. Klein demonstrated with ample fact references that while Cameron’s organization was condemning Hubbard and Scientology for alleged “mind control” Cameron himself was regularly drugging, poisoning, electroshocking, erasing the memories of, planting false memories in, and implanting commands into the brains of hundreds of unwitting human guinea pigs. Cameron’s victims were drugged beyond consciousness without their consent and then tortured and hypnotized, some for months on end. All hidden behind the cloak of the literal head of national and international institutions responsible for the betterment of human mental health. That is what made him an “expert” on Mind Control.

This is only the beginning of a story that would defy belief for many decades – until sufficient documentation could finally be obtained to prove it. Hopefully, it gives you some context from which to process the mind-numbing attacks, nullifications, brandings, and targeting being meted out by the deep state/corporate media cartel of late (witness Trump, Musk, Patel, RFK Jr, Tulsi Gabbard, to name a few).  There is more TO THE SCIENTOLOGY STORY. And at least one of the central characters makes Overholser and Cameron look like choir boys by comparison.

Going Clear, Part 20 Wright’s Straw Man

Going Clear, Part 20 transcript:

Mark Rathbun: Wright sets up a couple of straw men. They are related. The first straw man is the idea that Scientology is all predicated on the idea that Hubbard cured himself from being crippled and blinded and that this all happened at the Oak Knoll Naval hospital.  First of all, and I went through this in spades with Wright, demonstrating that that is a straw man.  It is a false premise.  The representation does not really exist, number one.  And number two, what actually happened at Oak Knoll didn’t involve L Ron Hubbard. And I gave him all the lectures where Hubbard covered it.  Hubbard did not say that he cured himself at Oak Knoll Naval hospital. He said he discovered the fundamental techniques of Dianetics by engaging in two-way communication therapy of sorts with people who were recovering from illnesses there.  And he talks about it at length and in detail. If you know anything about Dianetics and Scientology you can see. I gave him all the materials and explained it to him for days and gave him the primer so that he could understand it.  It makes perfect and logical sense.  Wright’s invented theory is based on a straw man. 

Going Clear, Part 13 Lawrence Wright’s actual malice re IRS

Going Clear, Part 13 summary:

Rathbun details the two years of ‘living hell’ the IRS put the Church of Scientology through before deciding there was no remaining grounds by which they could deny it tax exemption.  The IRS thoroughly examined every entity even marginally related to the church, including examining ten years of Founder L. Ron Hubbard’s taxes long after his death, including settlement of his estate.  It was only after the IRS exhausted every lead through all of the books and activities of every entity that they concluded, “Ok, they’re all exempt.”  It wasn’t that the church asked for or demanded every entity receive exemption; it was that the IRS insisted upon examining them.  Wright was informed of all this. Not only did he not report it, he wondered aloud in his book how it was that the IRS ‘caved’ to the church’s alleged demand for across the board exemptions.  Per Rathbun, Wright “never let the facts get in the way of his narrative.”  Wright asserts it was odd the IRS granted exemption when the “courts had repeatedly ruled in its favor” against Scientology. In fact, Rathbun shared dozens of more then-recent decisions the church had been racking up against the IRS, decisions that put the IRS in an legally untenable position should it not afford Scientology a full consideration for exemption for the many years which had yet to be adjudicated.  Rathbun details some of those decisions. None of it was mentioned in Wright’s book to maintain the fiction there was something untoward about the IRS’s 1993 tax exemption recognition of Scientology churches.  Clearly, Wright was setting up an “authoritative” book to use for the purpose of attempting to have Scientology’s tax exemption removed. That later proved to be the case when Wright, his film Director Alex Gibney, and paid witness Mike Rinder strenuously campaigned to have exactly that done – on the basis of the book Going Clear and its movie adaptation.  “I went through all of this with Wright, all of it, for many hours, including many follow up phone calls.”  None of it made it in the book.

Going Clear, Part 6

Going Clear, Part 6 summary: Australian Inquiry

Rathbun demonstrates how Wright ignored hard evidence in order to legitimatize what other journalists (none favorable to Scientology) described as a “witch hunt” and “kangaroo court” Inquiry into Scientology by the Australia parliament in the early sixties.  Wright reduces the fact of the Inquiry being instigated by slanderous material from US governments agencies by referring to it as an alleged delusory “belief” on the part of L. Ron Hubbard. Rathbun recounts how he went through a detailed account with Wright proving that the spreading of slanderous by the US government to the Australians was documented fact. 

Going Clear, Part 5 Dishonest Editing

Going Clear, Part 5 summary:

After establishing that 80% of L. Ron Hubbard’s time is accounted for when one reviews the magnitude and content of his thousands of lectures (Going Clear Part 2), Rathbun then examines Wright’s only significant quotation from those lectures. Rathbun demonstrates with the actual transcripts quoted that Wright liberally misquoted, mixed up the sequence of sentences so as to change meaning to smear Hubbard. Rathbun shows how Wright’s quoted passage omitted fully more than half of the text to make the lecture seem disjointed and non-sequitur. Rathbun produces the transcript and demonstrates with highlight pen the violence Wright commits against Hubbard’s words in order to put him in a bad light.  Wright even invents the ”point” that Hubbard was allegedly trying to make.  Rathbun demonstrates that invented point was very evidently NOT the point, the invented non-sequitur that Wright alleges. 

Tony Ortega – The Underground Bunker

Mark my words.  Tony Ortega and his unnamed sources will rue this day when they declared Monique Rathbun as fair game and subjected her to intentional libel.

 

Interview with Esquire.com

 

Marty Rathbun Is Scientology’s Public Enemy No. 1.  And He’s Okay with That.

Good vs. Evil

 

Choosing a side and then obsessively resisting against another side causes one mental and spiritual dissonance.  One doesn’t get relief from one’s dissonant self by changing sides and carrying on with resisting.  Agreeing to resist and then resisting is the trap.  Many a trap sells jazzed up forms of resistance.  Inspection of the salesmen on either side of most dramatic conflicts shows close parallels to those whom they invite you to resist.  Intuitive people can even perceive their similar exuded discordant wavelengths.

An easy mark for resistance recruiters is someone who has been deeply conditioned to resist.  Such folk are sitting ducks for re-enslavement by entrainment. Resisting against that which you once resisted for appeals to the denialist mind looking for return to the seeming comfortably numb stasis of two-valued thought.  It is the lazy, short-sighted condition experienced by those practicing denialism.

Both sides in denialist conflict depend upon one another for the continuation of their chosen crusade, in some cases even for their very identities.  All the while what you consider of the other side is precisely what it considers of you.  In the world of scientology this week while the post ‘Scientology’s Vortex of Hate’ was current, a prominent scientologist twittered that those interviewed in the documentary Going Clear were akin to ‘Nazis’ talking about Jews.   Meanwhile, one of those alleged ‘nazis’ publicly dropped the same ‘N’ word on scientology twice.   Two-valued logic thinking prevails: black vs. white, right vs. wrong, good vs. evil, God vs. the devil, America vs. the Nazis.

It is a game where everybody ultimately loses. Into the matrix one goes joined with and thoroughly dependent upon his nemesis for his very continued being.  One can even wind up difficult to distinguish from his enemy in terms of language and behaviors.

Transcending is often accompanied by some discomfort and some new thinking; and that requires a tad of courage.  The mechanics are similar to those employed in addiction rehabilitation.   The way out of the matrix is not paved for the pack-minded weak.  That is not to say it requires great effort.  It does require some discipline to learn the skill of letting go.

The simple minded on both extremes of the scientology ‘war’ will no doubt deal with this as denialists do with reason.  It will likely be categorized with a label convenient to stopping thought or contemplation, like ‘a call to apathy’, or ‘lack of compassion’ or ‘an apology for the enemy.’  For those perhaps capable of looking beyond the most immediate emotional impulse, and appreciating nuance and paradox, I leave you with a passage from the Tao Te Ching.

Nothing in the world is as soft and yielding as water.

Yet for dissolving the hard and inflexible, nothing can surpass it.

The soft overcomes the hard; the gentle overcomes the rigid.

Everyone knows this is true, but few can put it into practice.

Therefore the Master remains serene in the midst of sorrow.

Evil cannot enter his heart.

Because he has given up helping, he is people’s greatest help. 

True words seem paradoxical.

Scientology’s Vortex of Hate

Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard developed a complicated knack for sucking all who defied him or failed to comply with his dictates into a vortex of hate.  Virtually all of his closest associates who expressed the slightest doubt or disagreement with him were driven by Hubbard to wind up hating him with a vengeance.  A careful study of Hubbard’s history suggests the cycle was intended.  It garnered him all manner of hysterical calumny that he deftly turned into exhibits in demonstrating hate-filled ‘bias’ against  him and his creation, scientology.  And so it goes with his brainchild scientology and his successor David Miscavige.

In the early fifties Hubbard lectured to his followers that he considered that no group could survive for long absent a well-defined, hate-filled enemy.  He candidly admitted that he ‘chose’ psychiatry (generalized as ‘psychs’ to rope in virtually all mental healing arts and sciences) as scientology’s enemy out of convenience.  It worked well for a while.  Several prominent psychiatric and psychological societies worked feverishly to check or stop scientology in its tracks.  While the psychs were hard at it, scientology saw its greatest expansion, drawing close ranks to energetically fight off real (albeit largely self-created) threats to its survival.  Ironically, fifty years later scientologists came to believe as an article of religious faith that psychs are inherently evil, while psychs came to consider scientology little more than a harmless fringe cult.   Scientology sought refuge in the guise of religion and achieved a sort of immunity from the consequences of its crimes.  But it came at a cost, parking itself in time as a mid 20th Century anachronism.

As society itself evolved and hating lost its social acceptability, scientology lost its expansion-driving underdog, under-siege appeal and cohesiveness.  Its numbers have been gradually declining since the mid nineties when the last serious threat to its continued existence was overcome.   I use the term ‘last’ decidedly, notwithstanding the scientology infotainment blogs’ End of Days prophesying with the airing of ‘Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief.’  While the documentary will have an effect on the size of future potential new membership it will do little to change or alter scientology’s course.  (For more on that score, see Vice.com interview.)

Over time Hubbard and scientology fine-tuned their ethics system and organizational pattern to replicate its policies of hatred creation toward anyone who doubted or questioned any aspect of Hubbard or scientology.  The cycle seemed to go:  a) someone exposed scientology abuses or criticized its practices, b) scientology harassed the person to the point of driving him into a rage causing the whistleblower to become a crusader,  c) as scientology’s smears and attacks escalated in their audacity and dishonesty, the crusader naturally clustered with others similarly situated folks for support, (scientology all the while encouraged such clustering pursuant to principals set forth in Hubbard’s recommended text The Art of War) d)  as the cluster was then attacked as an ‘anti-scientology’ group,  its members developed a hate-filled culture, took scientology’s bait and started responding in kind, d) scientology then pointed to the character of hate-filled counter attacks as proof the attackers were haters.  Ultimately, haters hate, they wind up hating each other and the groups having no purpose beyond scientology’s demise accomplish little beyond steeling up scientologists to fight yet more battles.

You can see that same cycle playing out today.  Scientology forums read more and more like scientology’s propaganda sheet ‘Freedom.’  They are replete with name calling, expressing glee at every enemy faux pas, assigning evil motives to any and every enemy utterance or move, pronouncing hyperbolic end of days scenarios for the enemy, even targeting for distrust and enmity anyone who does not exhibit its own culturally devolved standards of ridicule and hate.  Their heaping praise and kudos on those mostly closely adhering to the company line verge on cult-like.  The tone, intelligence and tolerance levels are no different than scientology’s itself.  Their leaders have become as obsessed with scientology as scientology’s leading lights are.  Their sense of right and wrong becomes nearly identical (albeit reversed in vector) to scientology’s.

Scientology’s instilled ‘ethical’ values can be summed up in two clauses:  Whatever or whoever supports and forwards scientology is good; whatever or whoever detracts from scientology is evil.

Similarly, the anti-scientologists’ creed could read:  Whatever or whoever supports and forwards scientology (or, in extreme cases, is even neutral on the subject) is evil; whatever or whoever detracts from or attacks scientology is good.

Sadly, what apparently few of the former friends of Ron and ex-scientologists grasp is that when scientology successfully sucks one into its vortex of hate, one has lost and scientology has achieved its objective.

It is relatively easy to get former scientologists to go this route since they developed such simplistic denialist thinking patterns as scientologists.  They simply reverse the target and carry on as before in the comfort of a new group of like-minded pack members.

It is a regressive cycle.  It involves segregation, devolution, and descent.   It may give one an outlet for a cheap, temporary sense of relief, purpose or importance but at the end of the day it does not achieve its purported aims.   Paradoxically, it often has the reverse effect than that intended.  It winds up fueling scientology’s drive to expand numbers, resources and influence.  That perhaps is not surprising given the fact that that was scientology’s purpose for creating the vortex of hate in the first place.  Ultimately, scientology’s gloating, self-professed conquerors in fact wind up as unwitting agents of scientology itself.

Conversely, the only effective route to individual healing and growth is greater understanding.  Not surprisingly, it is the practitioners of that process that scientology attacks with the most resources and vigor.

The Active Ingredient in Scientology

The most active ingredient in scientology is not of scientology.  It was with us long before L. Ron Hubbard.  It has evolved and will continue to long after scientology ceases to attract headlines.  The seed of scientology’s rise and fall is Hubbard’s and scientology’s manic efforts and extreme measures taken to bottle and own and sell it (reference ‘Truth’).   This point is fleshed out a bit more in the latest post at the The Underground Bunker.

It is discussed in greater detail with Larry Flick on the Morning Jolt on sirius xm.  To listen to it do the following:

a. Go to the following link, Morning Jolt.

b. Go to the green bar ‘OutQ on SoundCloud.’

c. Scroll to ‘Marty Rathbun Blows The Lid Off Scientology…’