Tag Archives: tony Ortega

Going Clear Movie, Part 7 – Propaganda re IRS and Scientology

Going Clear Movie Part 7, Propaganda re IRS and Scientology

transcript

Mark Rathbun

Tony Ortega Propaganda on IRS and Scientology

At 1:05 they hit the IRS and they kick it off with Tony Ortega who says “there were 2,400 lawsuits, no only against the IRS but against individual IRS employees.” And so, the impression you get is that this was for harassment purposes because we’re doing this to hit the pocket books of individuals.  Wrong.  Federal law dictates the way you have to plead your lawsuit in the types of lawsuits dealt with. Freedom of Information Act, Privacy Act, etc.  Under certain statutes you must name the agents individually. That doesn’t mean the guy has to go off and defend the lawsuit. He is defended by the government lawyers.  But, he makes it sound in his tonality, like it is some important distinction (suing agents by name). No, it isn’t.  It is a distinction with no difference.  It is dictated by statute and it is meaningless.  It doesn’t create any further inconvenience or expense for the individual who gets named. 

Tax Exemption and Question of Religion

Lawrence Wright says at 1:09:20 says “this all leads to the question, how do you define religion?”  It is a total non-sequitur because it is not even a question to be resolved in the tax exemption proceedings. That issue had already been dealt with for twenty years by the courts.  Lawrence Wright says this, “the only organization entitled to make those distinctions is the IRS.”  Lie. Any agency anywhere, state, federal, local has to make that distinction all the time.  It is not just taxation. There are labor laws, there are ordinances  in cities. It is common throughout the woof and warp of government from the lowest level to the highest federal level.  The IRS does not have some special mandate from Congress that says, ‘you are the determiner of religion.’  And that is what Larry said here, and it is just an invention. It is a lie.  He goes on, “its an agency very poorly equipped to do that. I mean, they are mainly accountants and lawyers.  They are not theologians.”  I just note an irony, nor is Larry Wright a theologian, right?  But, he can riff all he wants to and he can set the anti Scientology narrative and the accepted narrative in the public’s mind as to religion in America.  But, according to Wright, the IRS can’t and they are not equipped to make that determination.  But, he goes on, “but, it’s the only opinion that matters.”  He’s talking about the IRS.  Untrue, the IRS’ opinion has not mattered since 1967 when they lost in Federal Court in the Hawaii Church of Scientology tax case and there has been an accumulating number of court precedents from Federal District Courts to Federal Appellate Courts to the United States Supreme Court to Supreme Courts in many lands that have made that question moot. It has been decided.  They are like the regressives they want to roll this back to 1950.  That’s what he is trying to do here.  It is done. You can’t undo it. You can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube.  The IRS’ opinion is meaningless now (as in 1992/3) on whether Scientology is a religion or not.  It is meaningless. It is res judicata.  It has already been decided.  And then Wright goes on, “Once the IRS has decided that you are a religion, then you are protected by the vast protections of the First Amendment.”  False! And he’s sitting there like he’s taking the audience to school, because he is the expert and he knows it; yet everything he is saying here is just absolutely false.  And he knows it is false, because I spent hours going through this with him and showing him and citing to him the decisions that I am talking about here. 

Alex Gibney piles on like a three stooges skit

So, with that profundity, Alex Gibney piles on with, at 1:10:30 “the war ended (between the IRS and Scientology) because the IRS surrendered.”  Like they literally got in their bunkered and waved a white flag.  I went through this for days and gave Wright tomes of material, and specific facts, and the whole timeline to show that this was utter and complete horse shit.

Going Clear Movie, Part 3 – Tony Ortega, anti Scientology propagandist

 

Going Clear Movie Part 3, Tony Ortega – Anti Scientology Propagandist, transcript:

Mark Rathbun:

At 25:30 of the film, Tony Ortega shows up.  I participated in a documentation that happened a year or two earlier that dealt a lot with my thoughts and perspectives about Scientology.  I was being relatively objective about it. The one thing that bothered me about it was they used this technique of interjecting Tony Ortega into it. The technique was they would press me on things – like the IRS, like there was something untoward about Scientology’s tax exemption, and I am not going to say that because it wasn’t true. I did say, “hey, we fought fire with fire, and we won, to get to the table; and then we were treated like a normal citizen. And we passed with flying colors.”  But they want me to say, no, no, you coerced it or you did it fraudulently.  And I won’t say it. So, they get me saying something about the rough stuff that was going on when we were going head to head with the IRS, in order to get too the table.  So then they bridge it with Tony Ortega just blithely saying, “Oh, yeah, they fraudulently got the exemption and – all this stuff that Marty is talking about, intimidated them into doing it (granting exemption).” So, he was used as bridge to get me to say all the false things I wouldn’t say throughout the movie. So, Alex Gibney, the great auteur – he is a lot like Mike Rinder, I don’t know if he has had an original thought in his entire life – because he used the exact same technique.  Tony Ortega’s name does not appear in Lawrence Wrights book and yet he is the most quoted people throughout the documentary. (Holds up book) He is not in this book!

Ortega will say whatever the anti Scientologist wishes

Tony Ortega comes in and makes any statement you need him to make in order to keep your false narrative flowing.  That they had to go to him, when he didn’t even appear in the book… I phoned Gibney after the fact and said to him, “you know what,  you are going to get all these accolades because it is very popular to jump on Scientology right now, but in the long run that was the biggest mistake you ever made, bringing this guy in.  And he didn’t deny it.  He just said, “well, I can’t throw him under the bus.”  And I said, “I’m not asking you to throw him under the bus. I am just telling you, I’m just informing you.”  And the context in which this came up was, Gibney wanted me to come to New York to the big international press day where they had this whole convention set up with every media under the sun, moon and stars. And I said, “ok, sure”, initially. And then I find out because Tony Ortega is all over it the he and Mike Rinder are going to be there.  And I told Gibney, “I don’t want to be an exhibit in a freak show. If somebody wants to talk to me, I want to have mature conversations about Scientology.  If you have something like that I’ll do it.”  So, I took Alex Gibney to school on Tony Ortega and why I wouldn’t want to associate or be involved with him.  Because it was a big juvenile delinquent style trolling game for Ortega.  And Mike Rinder was steadily becoming one of Ortega’s acolytes.  I told him “I don’t want to get into arguments and mess up your movie premiere; and I don’t want to have that type of juvenile discussion, game playing.”    And of course, I was right. 

Leah Remini and her Troublemakers, Part 13

Cybercult Formation

 

How do warlike tribes resembling cults form up in cyberspace?  Pankaj Mishra offers historical, psychological, and sociological answers in Age of Anger (2017).  A short passage from that book provides food for thought and self-reflection:

The current vogue for the zombie apocalypse in films seems to have been anticipated by the multitudes on city pavements around the world, lurching forward while staring blankly at screens. Constantly evolving mobile media technologies such as smartphones, tablets and wearable devices have made every moment pregnant with the possibility of a sign from somewhere. The possibility, renewed each morning, of ‘likes’ and augmented followers on social media have boosted ordinary image consciousness among millions into obsessive self-projection. The obligation to present the most appealing side of oneself is irresistible and infectious. Digital platforms are programmed to map these compulsive attempts at self-presentation (or, self-prettification), and advertisers stand ready to sell things that help people keep counterfeiting their portraits.

Meanwhile, in the new swarm of online communities – bound by Facebook shares and retweets, fast-moving timelines and twitter storms – the spaces between individuals are shrinking. In his prescient critique of the neo-liberal notion of individual freedom, Rousseau had argued that human beings live neither for themselves nor for their country in a commercial society where social value is modelled on monetary value; they live for the satisfaction of their vanity, or amour propre: the desire and need to secure recognition from others, to be esteemed by them as much as one esteems oneself.

But, as Kierkegaard pointed out, the seeker of individual freedom must ‘break out of the prison in which his own reflection holds him’, and then out of the ‘vast penitentiary built by the reflection of his associates’. He absolutely won’t find freedom in the confining fun-house mirrors of Facebook and Twitter. For the vast prison of seductive images does not heal the perennially itchy and compulsively scratched wounds of amour propre. On the contrary: even the most festive spirit of communality disguises the competitiveness and envy provoked by constant exposure to other people’s success and well-being.

As Rousseau warned, amour proper is doomed to be perpetually unsatisfied. Too commonplace and parasitic on fickle opinion, it nourishes in the soul a dislike of one’s own self while stoking impotent hatred of others; and amour propre can quickly degenerate into an aggressive drive, whereby an individual feels acknowledged only by being preferred over others, and by rejoicing in their abjection – in Gore Vidal’s pithy formulation, ‘It’s not enough to succeed. Others must fail.’

Leah Remini and her Troublemakers, Part 10

Leah Remini and her Troublemakers, Part 7

Leah Remini, Part 5 – Propaganda Techniques

Leah Remini, Part 5 –  Propaganda Techniques

Transcript:

Mark Rathbun:

Leah took me to school on how unreal reality tv is. Watching the second reality series – the Aftermath series – I see it takes it to a whole different level.  It is so obviously scripted, rehearsed, acted and dramatized every step of the way it is a whole new level of false impression.  I spoke earlier about how Alex Gibney pirated from Roast Beef Productions in the UK – he pirated this format they used in his documentary. Which is to say they came up with this idea of ‘well get the witnesses to say things, but if they won’t go far enough, we’ll bring in Tony Ortega who will say anything for a handout, and he can make it sound like the previous person said something else.”  And so they used him (Ortega) interspersed throughout, and Gibney did the exact same thing.  Tony Ortega who didn’t participate in the book – it was supposed to be a documentary about the book – is throughout the documentary because he is going to create the premise. In the Aftermath they compound the felony because they use the exact same technique except that the producer, director, talent, actors Leah and Mike Rinder are doing it throughout. They introduce a concept with a bunch of generalities. Then, they have someone say something.  Then Remini and Rinder jump back in and interpret and throw out more generalities. And (what was said by the interviewee) is completely and utterly altered, the reality of what the person’s experience was. In other words, the people who participate do not even have to have a story – and to date through Season One not one of them has a story worthy of news.  How do I know? Because I knew these people nine years ago when the news was reporting some of the stuff that was going on during the previous ten to twenty years when the media was interested. They did not make the cut then. But, they make the cut now (on Leah’s show) because they’ll say what they are saying, but as introduced by Leah and Mike and interpreted afterwards, and then bridged to their next comment, it all the sudden becomes this nefarious, scary thing. And that is the technique that is used, episode after episode. 

Leah Remini Part 4 – Remini and Tony Ortega, Blackmailers

Leah Remini, Part 4 – Remini and Tony Ortega, Blackmailers

Transcript:

Mark Rathbun:

Remini asks Rathbun to join the Anti Scientology Cult (ASC)

Talking about hypocrisy.  After I rejected the producer role where I can write my own ticket with Leah Remini (see Leah Remini, Parts 1-3) several months later Leah gets a hold of me and literally wants me to make a commitment to be in the ASC (Anti Scientology Cult).

Rathbun tells Remini he doesn’t want to join a cult

And told her, “look, I am not a joiner.  I’m not a sheep. I’m not a follower.  If you haven’t figured that out in the two or three years you have observed me…” And Leah said, “no, no, no it’s if you are against them, we’re together.”  And I said, “the problem is, you want me to join a group of people that have experience with who are demonstrably, obviously far more unethical, disloyal, criminal than any Scientologist I ever deal with in 27 years I was within it.”

Rathbun schools Remini projection

I told her, “And, yet as much as you rail about it, you want me to act in the very way you accuse Scientology of acting.”  In other words, “forget about all that stuff, if you are against them, you are with us. It’s use vs them.  And so if you are not with us, you are for them, basically.”  I told her, “no.”

Remini does what she accuses the church of doing

Remember, the narrative that Remini and the troika has been capitalizing on for the past three years, central to the whole thing which they go on and on about, is ‘disconnection.’  In other words, because in Scientology, to the extent that someone acting anti-socially can’t be reformed or lived with people will disconnect from them.  That that is such a ‘greivous crime’ to family and humanity that it justifies creating a cult to combat Scientology.  So, when I won’t join her group, Leah Remini literally disconnects from me.  And I mean in a way they don’t even accuse Scientology of doing.  She told me “not only are not to be in communication with me again, you must destroy all my contact information, because I am destroying yours!”  

It is not just a command that you are not to communicate with me, it’s “we’re going to make it impossible for us to communicate again.”  So, it could not have been a more explicit disconnection. And that was the response to me for refusing to say I will give love, devotion and surrender to this ASC cult of yours. 

Worse than Scientology

Now, after Leah Remini disconnects from me after I refuse to join the cult…Here is where the parallels come in with the narrative “Scientology disconnects from you, and then if you keep defying they ruthlessly attack you.”  So, I do a couple essays on my blog that are sort of time to time neutral on the subject of Scientology.  I always felt it was important that you attained some sort of objectivity about your experience in Scientology. Even if you felt it was negative to have it continually reinforced on you that it is negative, you are going to get sicker and worse.  Like Scientology, or virtually any self-help philosophy or like any religion, it is far more healthful to recognize that you are responsible for your own condition and move along and take the positive from your experience. So, I do a few posts and the troika (Remini, Rinder, and Ortega) goes crazy.

Tony Ortega Cult Hatchet Man Attempted Blackmail

Tony Ortega launches this smear campaign and he runs it for six months non-stop, about me and my family.  They attempted to infiltrate my family.  They attempted to drive wedges between my wife and me.  When that failed, they took up a collection to hire a private investigator to spy on and harass us.  And when that failed, they attempted to blackmail me. I literally received a blackmail threat. (and it was from the number one source of funding of Tony Ortega’s Underground Bunker operation).  “If you keep talking about the ASC, if you keep talking about our side of the story or about our laundry, we are going to expose all the crimes that you failed to disclose about your scientology experience.”  And I laughed at that because unlike them, I am the one person whose life has been an open book and there is nothing I ever held back. So, I said “go ahead.” My response was “make my day.” 

Ortega makes good on the blackmail threat

I didn’t hear anything for several months until the very day before Leah Remini’s January 2017 ABC 20/20 Special. I hear from ABC 20/20 asking me, “do you know a guy named Sergio?”  I said, “no, I’ve never known a Sergio in my life.”  Simultaneously, I receive an email from Tony Ortega, saying “Sergio Lame (or whatever his name is) says that he got raped by an old male when he was a teenager inside Scientology and that you found out about it and covered it up.”  So, I got what was going down. This was the payback on the blackmail threat.  They literally made it up.  So, I looked up this Sergio guy. He’d been going on for 3 or 4 months in the ASC troll farm.  The guy was so incredible, he would say some stuff one day that three days later he would absolutely contradict.  I mean his lack of credibility was so apparent just on the face of what he was saying without any refutation.  It was that bad.

The Tony Ortega Slander Laundry

So, Tony Ortega as he’s waiting for my response, blogs “watch 20/20 tomorrow; there’s going to be explosive, and I mean, explosive stuff.”  Then, it was clear to me it was going to be the Segio Lan “cover up.”  So, I wrote back to 20/20 and said “I never heard of this guy in my life.  But, now that I’ve heard from Tony Ortega I understand what is going on.  He’s running the same op he is running all the time.  Mike Rinder has explained it to me.” It goes like this, Tony will run anything because he has nothing to lose because he’s a nobody with a blog.  Scientology and nobody else is going to waste their time suing a guy who can never make good on whatever damage he does in the first place; and can blog from a shopping cart in an alley as well as he can from whatever apartment he is living in now. So, he’s got immunity in that respect from libel.  He’ll put out the sleaziest, most criminal innuendo with little grains of truth mixed in and keep repeating enough, with the intention that a tabloid at some point will start to pick it up. The intention is to keep feeding the tabloid with the intention that ultimately – in this degraded age of infotainment, click-bait news we live in – “legitimate media” will pick up on it.  And that is the only reason the blackmail didn’t run, because I called ABC out on it.

Summary

They blackmailed me, I told them bring it, they had nothing to bring so they literally manufactured something. They literally manufactured accusations of criminal conduct that never happened.  Accusations that were so unfounded that no media would run with it. But, they came within an inch from broadcasting it nationally. 

Now, take my experience and you get a better idea of how the ASC and troika (Remini, Rinder and Ortega) works vis a vis Scientology – they run the same gig as above day in and day out over a seven year period.

Leah Remini, Part 2 – Three Card Monte

 

Leah Remini, Part 2 – Three Card Monte

Transcript:

Mark Rathbun:

Rinder explained to me that they had literally had it worked out that – they, the three of them, the troika (Rinder, Remini and Ortega) – an operation, where Leah’s departure from Scientology would be orchestrated and be reported in a way that they would manipulate people into reporting it. It was an act. In other words, this is an active troll job. Leah would act as if she were being persecuted by Scientology for disagreeing with it and having all this “scandalous” information about it. All the while, she was having her agents create the story of her leaving.  And it was done in such a way as to try to create a reaction on the part of Scientology.  It was a string operation to try to get Scientology to reach out to try to salvage her, to get Scientology to have people disconnect from her.  All it would be part of an ongoing story.  It was all going to be a roll out to increase her profile and create this mystery and create this figure – this ‘warrior princess’, his innocent warrior princess.  She’d be this innocent princess who was turned into a warrior because she was hunted down and persecuted by Scientology.  That was the story.

As it rolled out Scientology never played its part.  And they just acted like it did. She never did get persecuted, she never did get hunted down, she never did get people begging her to come back. None of that stuff happened.  But, Rinder and Ortega just keep spinning the ball giving the impression that it did.  The reason I refer to Rinder, Remini and Ortega as a ‘troika’ – this cluster at the top of this thing (the Anti Scientology Cult, ASC) – is they have this penchant for having one of them act like ‘Mickey the Dunce’ when something happens. That is how they rolled out Leah Remini in the first place. Tony Ortega literally reported as if he were onto a hot tip from a “tipster.”  The ‘tipster’ was Leah Remini.  Ortega made it look like someone else, like an insider who was leaking. And Ortega literally quoted Leah’s husband – he reported that he called Leah’s husband and said “hey, we heard your having a big break up with the church of Scientology,” and her husband was reported as saying, “oh, no, not at all, we get along just peachy keen. And if we ever did, we would resolve it with the church.”  And Ortega goes as far as writing, “and we thanked  him for being so candid.”

News is created

Well, the whole thing was scripted by Leah Remini, her husband, and Mike Rinder and Tony Ortega. So he literally made up this ‘news.’  That is how the whole thing rolled out and started.  They continue that who op until today where one of them does something and the other one says “I don’t  know anything about that.”  Example. In the last episode of Remini’s first year of her series on Scientology, they spent the entire episode over Scientology accusing Leah of disaffecting and inspiring this kid Brandon Reisdorf to commit a hate crime by throwing a brick through a window of a Church of Scientology.  She was like, “hah, can you believe they have accused me?”  She is literally next to Mike Rinder as she says it. Rinder did in fact orchestrate the kid’s disaffection and inspired him into hating David Miscavige and Scientology so much that he was willing to maim somebody. And Remini spent the entire episode railing about how she was falsely accused and yet her partner Mike Rinder is sitting right next to her; the guy who executed the whole thing.  And I know first-hand that he did.

So, I refer to them as a troika, cluster for a reason.  If you do not consider them as an inseparable group, it is like a chimera, you don’t know where anything is coming from.  Because it is planned and executed that way. 

Ethics of the Anti Scientology Cult

Another example. They rail about ethics. “Scientology has this utilitarian ethics system, us v. them, good v. evil.”  The funny thing is that literally is the ASC (Anti Scientology Cult) system of ethics.  It literally consists of ‘if it harms scientology, it is good. If it helps scientology, it is evil.”  Period! Mike Rinder literally said on a podcast that Scientology is ‘fair game’ and you can literally can say and do anything you want against Scientology and get away with it.  Literally promoting that idea. 

Rank Propaganda

Ortega puts it in many ways, day after day, on his blog.  One incident really encapsulates what happens here.  A woman took her car and rammed it through the front door of the Austin, Texas Church of Scientology, sped through the lobby and crashed into the Church’s nursery where there were toddlers.  When the police arrived the woman said she was disappointed when she was told she hadn’t hit anybody; that she had failed to kill anybody.  And that was her only regret, that she didn’t.  It subsequently came out that she was primarily inspired to do this by Leah Remini.  She had been reading her book or watching her show or listening to her ramblings or her productions.  And of course, Leah Remini just never says anything about it.  Instead, Tony Ortega comes in and Tony Ortega flanks for her by trying to euphemize the whole thing.  He literally characterized the admitted attempted murder as delinquency.  Ortega’s got about a couple hundred people in his sheep farm (troll farm) and they generate thousands of comments a day because that is all they do all day, sit there and comment.  Just as an exercise went through the comment section that day. Out of two thousand comments, not a single person objected to his characterization or called him out on it.  And they are all just frothing these attempted memes of hatred against Scientology, based on a woman attempting to kill somebody with her car. 

Leah Remini and her Troublemakers

Transcript:

Mark Rathbun:

Denialism

Denialism is part and parcel with the whole ASC (Anti Scientology Cult) narrative. They have to any possible benefit and 55 million written and spoken words in lectures that constitute Scientology philosophy. They have to deny that it exists in its entirety.  So their narrative can be summed real simply as, “Scientology is a group of people who have no substance; there is no substance that they are trying to protect.  And yet they do two things. If somebody breaks ranks and vociferously disagrees with the group they are ostracized and are disconnected from. And if the person then escalates that disagreement and turns it into an attack, then Scientology ruthlessly dispenses with the attacker.” And that in essence is the narrative gone over and over. It is the basis of Going Clear (book and movie); it is the basis of their blogs (the troll farms). What I learned through 5 years of interacting with ASC – these people who are the authors of the bible of the ASC, and the center of the hierarchy (the Troika cluster, literally is that that narrative that they tell is precisely a description of themselves. 

There is literally no philosophy, it is literally an anarchy of ideas. There is no solution.  There is no interconnecting philosophy or way of looking at things.  There is only ostracizing, marginalizing and attacking Scientologists.  It is ‘use vs them’ and that is the only basis upon which the group exists. 

The TROIKA of ASC

The Troika (Remini, Rinder and Ortega) of ASC considered that they had a well defined, hardbound hierarchy. The only problem with it is that all three members think that they are in charge.  The three members, Tony Ortega who runs a daily blog serving as their PR meme guy, Mike Rinder who runs a daily blog and Leah Remini who runs reality TV and spin offs on Scientology.  Every meme, every idea that emanates from the ASC emanates from those three. It may be that someone has an idea and brings it in, but clears one of those three before it gets put out there.  And they continue to churn this stuff out and they only do it because it is profitable. 

When I said they consider they have a hierarchy, I have had discussions with these people.  Tony Ortega snickers about what fools Mike Rinder and Leah Remini are and how easy it is to sucker them into making Ortega the only “scoop guy” so he gets all the “scoops.”  Mike Rinder says that Leah Remini is just a ditzy, hair brained, privileged person, who has a greatly bloated image of herself and that he has to guide her every step of the way and  hold her hand. Leah Remini says Mike Rinder and Tony Ortega are hallucinating if they don’t realize that they are her bitches.  And she is just using them.  That’s why I say it is like a cluster; they think they have a hierarchy but each part of thinks their in charge. 

It is all about money

It always comes back to money. And Leah Remini explained it to me one day.  She asked me if I had been paid for participating  in Going Clear. I told her, “no, I never got paid for participating in any media or documentary. And that I never would out of principle.”  Remini said, “I don’t get that. I don’t  understand your thinking.  I didn’t participate because they wouldn’t pay me. I don’t do anything unless I’m paid. Nothing.”

Remini Scores Unlimited Funding to Attack Scientology

So at one point Leah Remini told me that after two years of careful work through her publicist, and Rinder and Ortega, had successfully come up unlimited financial backing to go after Scientology.  And that she was going to create a production to do so.  Leah told me that she was so well back that I could “write my own ticket” on this to participate as a producer.  So, I asked her “what are you looking at producing?”  And she told me essentially it was going to be a regurgitation of everything publicized about Scientology over the past seven years, about things that have happened over the past 40 years allegedly.  And that she would resurrect the players who were saying things about Scientology for the past seven years as somehow new and current.  My reaction was, “I have no interest whatsoever.” I’d had this conversation over two years, “if you want to do something that is educational, that is somewhat objective, that could lead to people getting on in life better, that gave some new perspective”, that was the only basis I told her I ever would participate in her stuff.  And I said, “and still stands. But, what you are proposing is essentially a cheap, tabloidesque pile on that I’m not interested in.”

And I thought that would be the last I ever hear of her.  Because, I mean that was the end of the conversation. I mean, she was like a long tailed cat in a room full of rocking chairs.  It was like Ralph Kramden, “humada, humada, humada.”  At the end of the conversation, she had nothing to say.  So, I did think that would be the end of it after I told her what my position was. But, it wasn’t. But I’ll get back to that and for now stick to the subject of financial motivation.

Mike Rinder in it for the money

Remini’s partner, Mike Rinder, since he has left the church of Scientology (2007) never had a job, was never employed, never lifted a finger to do anything that wasn’t related to Scientology work that was paid for by people who were interested in seeing Scientology’s ox get gored. I know that because for his first three or four engagements he had specifically asked me to help him get into a position where he could have such backers and I put him in that position.  So, since 2009 it has been a series of sugar daddies, one right after the others. A venture capitalist, former trader, actually there are a number of these people in that type of business. An old woman with a ton of money who is just obsessed on the subject. It has just been one after the other, and now Leah Remini.  In essence, he has followed the same philosophy as Leah Remini who – when I rejected her offer – went straight to Mike Rinder who took her up happily. 

Tony Ortega profits on misery of others

And then there is Tony Ortega, who is the third part of the troika.  Tony Ortega at one point was really sucking up to me because I was getting a lot of media attention and he wanted to get his media cred.  And he flew all the way down to South Texas to my home.  He had just got fired from the Village Voice which he had converted into this anti-Scientology platform for two years.  In rare moment when he had a moment to be somewhat candid, he told me circumstances under which he left the Village Voice.  And the circumstances he said – “you know, this can’t go anywhere,” but what happened was that the Village Voice had been accused, and in fact had been investigated by law enforcement, of human trafficking, and supporting the child sex slave industry, by way of its Back Pages ads.  And Ortega told me that Scientology had been exposing that and the problem is that Scientology was more accurate than anybody thought; and that, in fact, the Village Voice was almost exclusively by that human trafficking operation and that there were profits beyond that.  And so the owners, now that Scientology was exposing it and now that law enforcement was investigating it, decided they had to get rid of Tony Ortega because he was just obsessed with Scientology and that was keeping them focused on him and their operation. So, they needed to get rid of him.  So, in order to do that, and to extract his cooperation in keeping quiet about what he knew…which is interesting because Ortega is the first guy to accuse anyone who does go after Scientology of being bought off…Ortega literally agree to cover it up and obstruct justice for a payout of essentially a two-year buy-out deal.  They paid him enough to where he could literally do nothing for two years but go out and write a book about Scientology so he could begin with some foundation of credibility upon which to continue his career which had had turned into trashing Scientology. 

Sum up

So with all three of the troika I have had personal experience with which tells me the primary motivation is money.