Tel Aviv, 3 December 2012
To: My friends of 30 years,
Scientologists in Israel and world-wide
I discovered Scientology in 1979. I progressed steadily on the Bridge and today I am an OT5. I apply Scientology every day and in all areas of my life.
In the years 1986 to 1993 I lived 7 years in Norway and Denmark where I opened a branch of U-Man, a company for testing personnel which operated under a WISE license. My company gave services in Norway and Denmark. During those years I was on lines at AOSH EU and did my OT5. In 1991 I went to Flag where I did L11.
In 1993 I returned to Israel and a year later joined staff at the Tel Aviv Org where I served as the Public Relations Officer for two and a half years. At the same time I worked with children with study and behavior difficulties, applying LRH Study Tech. Today I work as an educator, continuing to apply successfully the Tech.
I came to Scientology in 1979 following a friend of mine whom I have not seen half a year. I observed in him amazing changes. His communication improved tremendously, he became effusive and full of affinity, bright, well-spoken. I wanted this too. He took me to the Scientology “Shalom” Center on Ha’Yarkon Street in Tel Aviv. A small place, packed full with people, busy and happy. People were smiling, coming and going.
“What is this?” I asked. They said, “Scientology.” “And what is that?” I continued. They answered, “It’s a philosophy to make the able more able.” I listened, I looked, I came and I won … The Communication Course was amazing. The tiny course room was packed full … if I did not come on time, I’d have to sit on the window sill. And the wins were accordingly huge.
Every piece of Tech, even the smallest, changed me into another being, more able – just like LRH promised. “What is true for you is what you have observed yourself.” This sentence alone rehabilitated my whole beingness. And since then, no person could ever enforce upon me his reality or his “truths”, if I did not observe them myself.
“Look, don’t listen” – Wow! This was an acknowledgement to my existence. From that moment on, no teacher, parent or leader, could tell me, using authority of age, experience or education, something that I have not seen or experienced myself and forced me to agree with him. That was a life-changing win!!! That was one sentence that I really understood.
And since then, there were quite a few things I did not agree with – even when reading Scientology materials. I never hesitated to go to the Course Supervisor or to the Ethics Officer at the Org or to any Tech Terminal, and express before him my disagreement. Knowing that his response will be: listening to me and showing me the proper materials, LRH references, asking me to look at more data. Usually I could see things from a new viewpoint and then agree (or not…) because I saw or realized. No one forced his views on me, no one showed me phrases out of context, no one threatened me and I was never afraid to talk … I am still not afraid! Back then, I did not have to calculate how much my thoughts will cost me in hours of “ethics investigation” before my next step on the Bridge.
When I studied ARC, I really understood the truth of life. I realized that I have arrived at the most sane and intelligent place on this planet. For what is intelligence if not an understanding of the reality of life? And what is communication, if not an understanding of the realities of others and of life? … And affinity was everywhere …..
When I learnt about the suppressive personality, what it really does, what are its intentions and what motivates it, I could easily spot Suppressive Persons. You certainly remember the datum, “They suppress their fellow men because all are Martians intending evil and destruction …,” right? How many such people did we spot? Oops … not 30 a month, right? Because there aren’t such quantities of SP’s being made or born.
Here I am today, more that 30 years later, observing that for many years the amount of affinity around me is declining, the number of people with an independent viewpoint is shrinking. Seeing that people are afraid to talk or to even listen – because somebody might find out and then, exhausting Ethics Investigations, menacing and expensive, lurking around the corner.
And the reality – I am demanded to accept a reality that is not mine. Suddenly, there are lists of Suppressive Persons, people I have known for many years. No matter how much I examine their actions, I cannot find one suppressive act and usually the opposite is true.
Is it not true, then, that the person who today establishes the criteria for declaring SP’s, is himself inflicted with the idea that, “all are Martians intending evil and destruction …,”?
And so I set out to look for my old friends, intelligent and happy. Those who do not seek impressive buildings, plastered with expensive wallpaper. The environment around me was no longer my group. This is not what I came for, yet since my wins were really great and stable, they could not be shaken.
And so I started to look for my old friends. One by one I found them in other places. Here’s what I found out: I agree with everything written in Debbie Cook’s letter, in Luis Garcia’s letter, in the letters of Renata and Claudio Lugli, in the letter published by Dani Lemberger.
With great sadness I remove myself from the Church of Scientology. At the same time, I am happy to discover that there is a large group of my former friends, people who are free thinkers. Those who are not willing to be led by writings that were not written by LRH, that do not even resemble the spirit of his true writings.
I salute their courage in being pioneers. I join with joy the Independent Scientologists and am proud to see that again, we the Israelis are bold, innovative trailblazers. I am happy that I have an independent organization, DrorCenter, which is busy, in communication, full of affinity and caring.
Dror’s purpose is to set Man free and to build a truly “Ideal Org,” one that is not vain and ostentatious. (A suggestion – maybe we should all sit down and demo in clay the concept “Ideal”, this could be interesting …). At DrorCenter, the Advanced Levels are available for me and for all, standardly. Again I have a group!
I have to thank Tami and Dani Lemberger who were there ready with the only Advanced Org in the Middle East. They made it possible for me to return to the place that I was missing for almost twenty years.
This letter is sent with love and with hope that many more will realize that Scientology can no longer be identified with an organization headed by a man who is terrified. A man obsessed with the idea that he must suppress others and the whole organization he heads so as to preserve his own survival.
Tsipi Andersen
Posted in acknowledgments, black dianetics, Debbie Cook, ethics, healing, independents, Israel, justice, l. ron hubbard, miscavige crimes, policy, the future, the Reformation, Uncategorized
Tagged "mark rathbun", Dani Lemberger, Dror Center Haifa, Independent Scientologists, l. ron hubbard, marty rathbun, scientology, Tami Lemberger, Tsipi Andersen
1. Letter to All Scientologists.
15 November 2012
From: Don Schaul
Ex- Qual Sec Malmo Ideal Org
Class V Auditor & C/S
A MESSAGE TO ALL MY SCIENTOLOGIST FRIENDS AND OTHERS
DOUBT CONDITION ANNOUNCEMENT
Dear Scientologists and friends,
I am writing this letter to you after a long period of silence from my side. Most of you did not know what is happening with me or what am I doing in present time.
The following is my story. A part of you already know it. It is worth telling to those who are not familiar with it.
As of now, I am 18 years old only and I am a Class V Auditor & Case Supervisor (Validated). I have also completed many other courses, such as different OEC Courses, the Hubbard Data Series Evaluator’s Course, etc.
My passion with Scientology started already at the age of 6. A few years later I represented Scientology as a very young Human Rights activist which created huge outflow for Scientology, LRH and Human Rights in Israel. I appeared a few times on all three national TV channels in Israel. Most of you remember me as that little kid.
At the age of 12 I already knew that LRH’s tech was what I wanted to work with, in this life.
I convinced my parents and they allowed me to study and acquire Scientology training. I did most of it at the Johannesburg Org, South Africa.
At the age of 14, I was the youngest trained Case Supervisor on the planet.
I returned to Israel as soon as I completed my training. I started auditing my family and brought both my parents up the Bridge, all the way to New Era Dianetics.
When I returned to Israel, many staff tried to recruit me to be a staff member at the Tel Aviv Org. I refused as I wanted to audit my family so as to maintain high exchange with them for all they’ve done for me.
When there was a big need to open the new Ideal Org in Malmo, Sweden, the pressure to join staff became very strenuous. What really tempted me to join, finally, was: 1. I could really contribute to the expansion of Scientology organizations as I always wanted, 2. I would be the Senior Case Supervisor, and 3. That all of my expenses would be taken care of by Malmo Org. Just to remind you – at that time I was still a minor and a foreigner in Sweden so I could not support myself financially, legally. The third point was the most crucial of all, as it concerned my immediate survival.
I joined staff when I received, in writing, a signed CSW, noting that the Org will take care of all of my expenses.
As I started working as a Senior C/S, it soon became clear to me that Malmo Org will not keep its promise to pay for all of my expenses. I had to get my parent’s financial support, again.
However my parents were not at their best financially, to say the least, and they had a hard time supporting me financially. Following that, I asked HCO Malmo to relieve me of my staff contract and let me return home.
My request hit a huge wall of resistance and their way to handle me was trying to ruthlessly change my mind and also give me an aggressive Sec Check that took about 11 intensives of auditing. In order to make it even harder, I was made to do humiliating jobs such as cleaning toilets in front of public and staff. I was threatened with SP declares, not to mention an insane lack of sleep situation I was put in.
I wrote up all that was happening with me to RTC, only to receive an “ack”, yet absolutely no action.
My parents were worried about my future in Scientology and so took the burden of paying for all my expenses for the rest of my contract. I gave up and decided to stay until my contract was finished.
I was later promoted to the post of Qualifications Secretary in Division 5. Acting on this post, I noticed the lack of application of the Tech, and many actions which were off-policy. I reported on whatever I saw. I have come to realize that almost every time I reported on such an action, the result I got was punishment and being sent to ‘Cramming’.
The attempts align with the actions of management took their toll, and in my turn I have put that pressure on other staff members.
I hereby apologize to those who have suffered from that pressure. This was off-policy and pure idiocy. I take full responsibility for it.
Towards the end of my staff contract, I got onto the Staff Leaving Routing Form.
As part of that Routing Form I was supposed to receive a Staff Leaving Sec Check. I did not resist getting one, quite to the contrary – I demanded it over and over as to prevent the prolongation of my stay in Malmo. 3 months passed since I routed onto that Routing Form and I still did not get this Sec Check. The last day came but there was still no possibility of going in session – so I left the Org and returned home, to Israel.
HCO Cope Off Malmo, Mr. Dor Levi, was sent after me to Israel to bring me back to Malmo like I was some sort of a criminal. I did not agree to come back as I fulfilled my contract. The Org did not fulfill its part of the promise, to be precise. However, as I wanted to handle the situation, I flew to AOSH UK and got my Staff Leaving Sec Check in complete. To return to Malmo? No way!
Obviously, Management and Malmo Org did not like this.
From all I’ve seen and experienced myself, I came to the conclusion that something in our way of operation as Scientologists, Staff Members and Management, departed from LRH’s writings both Technically and Administratively.
For example, the Staff Leaving Routing Form does not state that you are supposed to Sec Check a Staff Member for 10 intensives because he wishes to leave, but it should be a maximum of 5 hours (Ref: HCO PL 28 March 1962, TERMINATION FORM).
As a Qualifications Secretary, I encountered a hidden data line when auditors and supervisors who came from Flag did not agree to talk about the “New Bridge” as they were made to sign a million-dollar bond.
Of course, all this creates the following –
A. A hidden data line opposing to LRH’s statement on the fact that there is none, and that all he discovers he also publishes. (Ref: HCO PL 16 April 1965, Issue I, KSW Series 22, “THE HIDDEN DATA LINE”), and;
B. Technical degrades with the label of “old”. KSW #1 is being placed in the beginning of every Scientology course pack for a reason. The Technical Degrades HCO PL states that labeling technology as “old” or “historical” is a High Crime.
More examples? There you go:
– Staff member named E.P., received 11 intensives of Sec Checking. The Sec Check was stretched over a period of 3 years. Its purpose (stated on the program) was to “handle her illness”. This is a program that was under the supervision of the Senior C/S Europe, Mr. Alberto Bussolin. The program was delivered by Flag trained auditors V.R. and E.G.
Pc E.P. got well when the right program has been written and executed on her, by me. When the Pc folder was seen at CLO EU, I received a Cramming Order stating that her Sec Check was “quickied”. (11 intensives)
– Staff members who are prohibited from reading Pc folders regularly went into the HGC, looked at and read Pc folders, especially for recruitment purposes. If someone said in session that he is not an ‘IAS member’, session data was being used to make him donate. In this activity the following were involved: Mrs. Lucky Story (Malmo CMO Int Mission I/C), the rest of the Malmo CMO Int missionaires, Mrs. Anna Skibbe (Malmo recruitment project I/C), other recruiters and registrars, both from Malmo Org and from the Sea Org.
– The Malmo CMO Int Mission I/C, Mrs. Lucky Story, used to stand in my office or in the Senior C/S’ office, with the ED, OES, the Dissem Sec and the folder page and read out loud Next C/Ses of staff and public Pcs. This happened at least 8 times. This data is confidential and is protected by ministerial confidence, by law. No one beside the auditor or the C/S have the right to have it. We were also unable to say anything against her doing this.
– Pc C.P. received her Grades at Flag – Grade O in 3 hours, Grade I in 2 hours, Grade II in 5 hours, Grade III in 2 hours and Grade IV in 4 hours. She did those Grades in 2011. I will not go into what was actually run, but any C/S or auditor could tell you certainly that those are Quickie Grades. LRH writes about Quickie Grades in HCOBs, and their damage to Pcs and Orgs.
– Happy Clears who went to receive their CCRDs came back upset, sick and with obvious indicators of a wrong indication. There is also a hidden data line delivered on the subject of “past life Clears.” I have had at least 6 past life Clears on my lines in Malmo who were denied proper handling either by Flag, AOSH EU, AOSH UK or CLO EU. Quoting the words of the Saint Hill C/S AOSH EU: “Don’t send them for the CCRD, this is off-line”. They are not being allowed to attest to the State of Clear, period. They are simply put to redo the lower Grade Chart. This is a clear violation of C/S Series 123R, the CCRD Series, and many other HCOBs.
– During the period of 3 years, there were only 2 auditors in training at the Malmo Org. The only auditor who was fully trained at Flag up to Class V Graduate, had to be sent back to Flag for retraining. The fact that Orgs are not able to train auditors, or that training takes a very long time is a very serious, gross out-point. Take an HGC Auditor from Tel Aviv Org – T.T., as an example – 4 years of training at AOSH EU and 10 more years at Flag only to return as a Grad V, FPRD Auditor!
– An intern sent her session video to the Senior C/S FSO (who passed the video) and then to RTC for approval and final Internship pass. Her video was stuck at RTC for 3 months. It then came back with one ‘Flunk’, saying that she “did not end the session fast enough”, not referring her to any LRH reference nor sending her to Cramming. Needless to say that this intern blew from training for good.
– Student P.B., on the Pro Metering Course, was called, along with the Senior C/S, to watch his final video submission on the big screens in the RTC office. This was done so that they could measure the size of the read with a ruler and determine whether it was a “Small Fall” or a “Fall” (different meter reads). Do properly trained auditors need to take so much time to determine the size of a read? Were these actions ever done by LRH?
– On at least 20 different times – the overrun phenomena described in HCOBs, while running Objectives processes, were absolutely ignored on Pcs audited at Flag, AOSH EU or AOSH UK. In a lecture delivered by the Senior C/S Europe in the Senior C/S conference at AOSH EU in 2011, he said: “Objective processes are run with no regard to any overrun phenomena”, without referring to any LRH reference.
And the list goes on…
In light of the situations listed above and many more, I decided to do a standard Doubt Condition formula. This is because I have complete faith in LRH’s tech and in my strong willingness to support Scientology and its expansion. I have met with the Ethics Officer of Tel Aviv Org and the OSA representative of Tel Aviv Org, Mr. Sefi Fischler.
As part of this condition formula, one must acquire data with no prejudices and from any source possible: real data and real statistics.
When one tries to get the statistics of Scientology, he is being sent to watch events on video.
Unfortunately, if you will really try to go down and investigate real international figures and numbers of auditors made, the number of satisfied Preclears or the number of real active Scientologists from the data provided by those videos, all you will get is a headache. And no real data.
While investigating this as a Hubbard Data Series Evaluator, the thing that caught my attention was, sadly, the fact that those outpoints did not come from certain people in this or that Org, as I thought earlier – but that this is the way Management covertly operates, encourages and guides towards, in handling certain people and situations. As I’ve heard many times from the Malmo CMO Int Mission I/C, she and her mission was directly run by Chairman of the Board, Religious Technology Center – Mr. David Miscavige. I had to look no more to understand what the source is.
I received data from the Org along with threats of being SP declared if I do not disconnect from my friends. All of this occurs when the Church’s spokesmen assert at every chance that there’s no ‘Disconnection’ in Scientology. At certain times I decided to disconnect and at certain times I decided not to.
This is a normal thing when one is in the Condition of Doubt.
I spoke to my friends, investigated and checked with any possible means, as I wanted to see the whole picture and get out of this condition.
This step took me a long time as I realized that I have been living in the dark for a very long time. There were many things I had absolutely no clue about, or that were covered by false PR.
The Org had a big problem with the fact that I decided to look by myself on data that was not supplied by them. This is wrong as they could not show me a single reference where LRH prohibits checking up on data from different sources.
I am an upstat Scientologist, with a record of more than 4,000 Well Done Auditing Hours in the chair. Also, I did Case Supervision both at Orgs and in the field.
I decided to forward the aims of our group and did so since I was very young. I moved my whole family up the Grade Chart. I have made progress in Scientology since the youngest age possible and my purposes are similar to those of all the members of Scientology who believe in the Tech that will set mankind free.
I disagree with the fact that I cannot look at data for myself, decide for myself and believe in what is true for me. I came to Scientology in order to ‘know how to know’, to think freely and to break the chains of suppression on the freedom of thought. This is my elementary right. Furthermore, based on my training, I believe in my ability to examine data and choose sensibly what to do, without prejudices.
I believe that as a Scientologist, I have the responsibility to check on what is wrong, ask questions, get the chance to make a change, make that change, be open and be able to talk about it publicly. Please do remember that free communication is one of our elementary rights as human beings.
Remember: The End Phenomena of the Professional TRs Course and the End Phenomena of Expanded Grade O is being able to freely communicate to anyone on any subject, as uncomfortable as it may be, on all flows. This is supposed to be our virtue as Scientologists! The highest ability in this universe is the ability to communicate. Along with that we commit, as well, the most major “overt” that LRH speaks of – to be there and to communicate.
There you have a Doubt Condition – to communicate or not to?
I am an Auditor and a Case Supervisor and I will never stop being one. I will always continue to audit and move others up the Bridge, no matter what happens.
My decision is to do this in such a place where there’s no suppression on the freedom of speech or on the freedom of thought, and in which Standard Tech could be delivered. With no disturbance.
I implore you, as a Scientologist, to open your eyes.
Keeping Scientology Working is everyone’s job, and this job could never be owned by this or that management. Even though we all have word-cleared that HCO PL, we all sin in leaving its application to a “higher” body that will keep the Technology working for us.
This is the future of all of us. We have to make sure Scientology will continue to exist, cleared of false data and changes that are hard to recognize as individuals. We have to ensure that Scientology will be correctly delivered to us and to those around us.
Start looking for yourself.
Ignore the floods of false PR and ask for precise statistics.
A lot of confront is required – the confront of evil. It certainly is a hard thing to do, yet not impossible.
Take a step to a better future for us all.
Start communicating. We CAN create a change in the world of Scientology. It takes REAL Scientologists to do it.
Scientology and the CHURCH of Scientology are two different things.
I choose to be an Independent Scientologist. I am independent and free from suppression.
I am here to get you up the Bridge on both sides. I am going to work hard so that we will all have a Bridge to travel on.
I will be glad to answer any question and communicate with each and every one on the things that brought me to this decision.
Lots of ARC,
Don Schaul
Class V Auditor & Case Supervisor (Validated)
Fully Hatted Qualifications Secretary (Gold Sealed)
Hubbard Data Series Evaluator
Independent Scientologist
2. Letter to Independent Scientologists.
14 November 2012
An open letter to all Scientologists from the former Qual Sec of Malmo “Ideal Org”
Hello everybody,
My name is Don Schaul. I am an Israeli, I’m 18 years old. In this lifetime I trained up to Class V C/S. I have been the youngest C/S on the planet at the age of 14. I have also been a staff member at the new building of Malmo Org in Sweden, as a fully hatted Qual Sec.
There is a little story that I’d like to share with you today. Many do not know it.
After getting trained at the ages of 12-13-14, all on my own, as a public, my biggest passion was to join staff and help the planet as much as I can with the tools I have just acquired.
I was recruited by two Sea Org members who toured around Europe on a mission to recruit for the new “Malmo Ideal Org” that was about to open.
As I was a minor, unable to support myself financially, I was promised (in writing) to have all my expenses covered by the Org while being on staff. This unfortunately did not happen and I had to lean on my parents (who were in Israel), to financially support me.
The first months in Malmo were indeed hard, I wanted to leave, but as I was the only C/S around I was being kept there on an HCO Sec Check at the CLO Europe which was 9 intensives long (!). At the end I gave in and somehow worked out a solution to stay there until my contract would be completed.
I have received a one man Qual Division when I came. When I left, I have expanded this Qual Division to 5 people and 10 more on the TTC (Technical Training Corps – In training for a Technical post such as Auditor, C/S, Supervisor, etc.).
I have used my time in that Org to get myself trained on Admin Tech as well. And that is when I started to open my eyes and see the glaring outpoints.
Malmo “Ideal” Org has been a dead Org since its opening. This Org had its stat of “Bodies In the Shop” at 50 at almost all times throughout those 3 years, with no change.
This Org is being directly run by “CMO Int”. In one of many conversations with those CMO Int missionairs, I have been told that they have all been taken off post (and so is the rest of CMO Int) to be part of the ‘Ideal Org Unit’ and run all the Ideal Orgs on the planet.
As I have audited both of my parents on their entire Grade Chart up the New Era Dianetics, and wanted to continue with their auditing, I had to get them both to Malmo and audit them on my free time.
My mother, who has never experienced the vibe of the Church’s Management, came to Sweden for 3 weeks, left her job and was very stressed on time to get the auditing done and go back to Israel. As the CLO Mission I/C, Mrs. (un-) Lucky Story found out that my mother is coming to get “free auditing” from me, she decided to send me to CLO EU (which is near Malmo) for Cramming and take me “off the chair” as an auditor and C/S because she looked at a pc folder (!!!!) of my Pc and saw some “outpoint” (needless to say that Lucky is not trained in Tech and it’s absolutely none of her business to look at Pc folders).
My mother had to wait for 5 days until I got through “Ethics and Cramming” and could take her in session. She finally got in session and I managed to create a safe environment for her as much as I could.
While my mother was there she was also on course. As she wanted to leave back to Israel she wanted to rout out of the Org. She went to see the ED as part of this and while going to the ED (who was standing outside of the Academy), she saw Lucky shouting at the ED, telling her that she’s downstat. This was in front of all public in the class and in front of my mother. My mother was shocked. Lucky came later to my mom and said that she is sorry it was done in that forum. However, this kind of behavior by an Int Executive was shocking to her.
There were violations of Policy, Tech and Ethics Tech, left right and center, but I was able to do my best and keep producing as I have had another person in my Division who was thinking the same way I was – the Senior C/S, Phil Bruemmer.
We have fought together against suppression whilst on staff. It was much easier to do this when we were a team. However, we were being attacked over and over and over.
You can see some of the situations we have encountered in the reports attached. We have always ended on the top of things whether people decided to suppress us or not.
At the end of our contracts we have both left. You can see the story of Phil’s leave cycle at the attached report. I have simply disappeared when my contract ended as I knew nobody would EVER let me go.
I had to open my eyes and realize that all these outpoints that I see lead up to a very big WHY or a WHO. I realized that the fact that you can’t talk, you can’t question and you can’t look is NOT Scientology. And those are the characteristics of an implant.
At the moment I realized this, my world changed a 180 degrees and I started confronting.
The way the Church keeps people enslaved is by keeping them ignorant. And you do that by NOT training them. The bad thing is that even when the Church trains people, they get the training in an environment that they are not allowed to fully use what they have learned – and they cannot even see it! That is exactly what happened with all of my young “friends” who have trained as auditors within the Church. They are not auditors and needless to say, not real Scientologists.
So there is certainly a big future ahead of us. And as we are bringing real Scientology to the new generations of Earth, the most important thing to do is to TRAIN AUDITORS and give them the right to USE WHAT THEY HAVE LEARNED.
I might have been a little more perceptive as this is not my first Lifetime in Scientology and I was already highly trained before I took this body, but this only shows that training is what will protect you and keep you out of the traps of this world.
I am now declaring my independence of the suppressive group of the Church of Scientology and I am starting to do real Scientology as a free being. I see it my responsibility to bring Scientology to the new generation and into the future.
Lots of love,
Don Schaul
Class V C/S
Hubbard Data Series Evaluator
Fully Hatted Qualifications Secretary (Gold sealed)
3. Reports
Here are a few written reports which concern some of the situations I have encountered:
Some of the following reports were written by Phil Bruemmer, ex-Senior C/S Malmo and my junior as the Qual Sec. We were in those situations together.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUQTNZX01DU3JBZ3c
2. Knowledge Report written by the Senior C/S on the LRH Comm Malmo, concerning her protecting that same Flag trained auditor from getting corrected. Their common agreement was that me and the Senior C/S “weren’t standard” because we are not “Flag trained”.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUZ2xQQ0stWDd6d0U
3. Another Knowledge Report on keeping the same flubby auditor in the auditing chair, written by the Senior C/S.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUNzd3VFVEdlVNeHc
4. Knowledge Report written by me on the LRH Comm Malmo for condoning a severe injustice on me.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUenJQbENhbWIzUG8
5. A report written by me concerning the misapplication of the EstO Tech. Note: There has been a long debate on this subject with the CMO Int Missionaires, terminals from CLO EU, etc. I have been Crammed on the subject, and was literally told in Cramming by the CTO EU Cram Off: “That is how it is being done today. I understand it’s not per the policy but there’s nothing much you can do about it”.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUaVp0MzBaeTRoUTQ
6. A report written by the Senior C/S, concerning the misapplication of the EstO Tech.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUdk02TGtBQVZQcEk
7. A Knowledge Report written by the Senior C/S concerning a squirrel Exec EstO (who was put on the post with the minimum training level of Staff Status II and BSM, by the CMO Int Mission).
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUTmlZczdaR2tUT00
8. An Evaluation done by me on Public Courses in Malmo Org. This should give a clear picture on the fact that only NEW programs are being pushed by management, forgetting the old. (The new Dianetics Rout Program over the rest of the “old” Public courses.) The Malmo CMO Int Mission I/C, Mrs. Lucky Story said on this eval: “It only fault-finds management and is a complete brush-off”. Well…
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUTXhacmJUUldlc28
9. A Knowledge Report written by the Senior C/S concerning a 3rd Party situation in the HGC.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UURXVYbEZBNC1taE0
10. Knowledge Report written by the Senior C/S, concerning a scene in the HGC:
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUSURvbUdiZWV6N2M
11. A’ Things That Shouldn’t Be Report’ written by me to RTC, a few days after leaving staff.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUbmNWX3JXT2p4TzQ
12. A Knowledge Report written by me as a Field Auditor, on privacy invasion, 3rd Party, and simple cruelty. It also shows the Churches views on the subject of homosexuality, which in my eyes has caused many Pcs, students and staff a great amount of suffer.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUTTVuZ1pZR2dSTmc
13. A report written by me to RTC on Phil Bruemmer’s SP declare. I have obviously received no answer on that one, yet I am still was at that time in “good standing” with the Church.
https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUc3pGbGhzdHZkQTA
If you wish to share my letter with any of your friends in the Church or outside of it, here’s a link for you: https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B50LxZIhC0UUZ1d1dXllemlpWTA
Posted in acknowledgments, black dianetics, David Miscavige, ethics, FLAG, healing, independents, justice, l. ron hubbard, miscavige crimes, Orgs, policy, propaganda, regging, squirreling, tech, tech alterations, the future, the Reformation, training, Uncategorized
Tagged "mark rathbun", David Miscavige, Don Schaul, Idle Orgs, Malmo Scientology, marty rathbun, scientology
What follows is a detailed insider view of the Flag Land Base (Scientology Inc’s Mecca is Clearwater Florida) of late. Former RTC and Flag Auditor, Silvia Llorens gives a credible state of the dis-union of Scientology Inc.
TO INDEPENDENT SCIENTOLOGISTS:
Posted in acknowledgments, black dianetics, celebrities, David Miscavige, Debbie Cook, ethics, FLAG, golden age of tech, healing, independents, l. ron hubbard, mexico, miscavige crimes, policy, propaganda, regging, squirreling, tech, tech alterations, the Reformation, Tom Cruise, Uncategorized
Tagged "mark rathbun", Clearwater Florida, David Misavige, Debbie Cook, Flag Land Base, marty rathbun, Scientology Inc, silvia Llorens, Tom Cruise
Dear friends and fellow Scientologists,
Some of you may have noticed that I haven’t been too active or visible at OTC meetings, OT Ambassador activities (I have been an OT Ambassador since 1995), Int Events, Ideal Org fund raising meetings, Ideal Org openings, etc. over the past many months. I haven’t been back to Flag for about a year.
Some of you may have wondered what’s happened. Well, the truth is, I have been wondering that myself. I have pondered this and even concluded that my withdraw must be caused by my own overts and withholds. I’ve originated this to Tech Terminals at Flag, D of P, Flag MAA, to my FSM and even to close friends (that I must have O/Ws causing withdraw). I have been in session at Flag several times over the past year or two and in metered interviews with MAA. I have also written up OWs. Still, I found myself not really reaching or wanting to participate in these church activities including my own Bridge progress. (And yes, I did complete The Basics about 4 years ago and had good wins).
There just seemed to be these nagging considerations of outpoints that would not as-is, go away. As of this date, my Ethics File at Flag is very empty with the exception of many dozens of Commendations as an OT Ambassador for 17 yrs., Power FSM and Front Lines Disseminator in the WISE Sector for the past 29 years. I’m not saying here that I am some perfect little angel, but those of you who know me, know that I have been an unwavering, staunch supporter and defender of our church, Scientology and LRH for 35 years.
Why am I communicating to you?
“We of the Church believe … that all men have inalienable rights to think freely, to talk freely, to write freely their own opinions and to counter or utter or write upon the opinion of others…” The Creed of the Church of Scientology, 1954.
Hung-up at Doubt. “But if he’s PTS, he’s stuck in a problem and is unable to come to a decision. When a person is faced with suppression…The first manifestation of and the first consequence of a problem is indecision…FALSE DATA.
False data can also cause a hang-up on the Doubt Formula…stuck with this suppressive false data.” – HCO PL 18 DECEMBER 1982 ETHICS CONDITIONS: HANG-UP AT DOUBT
Did I have “false data” was I under “suppression”?
I’ve realized in recent weeks, that I have effectively been in sort of a state of indecision and silent protest for many months, even several years now. And that I have had some major and basic considerations that I just couldn’t reconcile.
Precept # 7 TWTH: “Seek To Live With The Truth. False data can cause one to make stupid mistakes. It can block one from absorbing true data.”
I also know as a trained Data Series evaluator, that behind Out-points there is a Situation and below that a Why.
“Personal integrity is knowing what you know – what you know is what you know – and to have the courage to know and to say what you have observed. And that is integrity.” -LRH
There is a tag line message in Church Promo that states: “think for yourself.” I personally think this is good advice.
LRH states this another way: “Look, don’t listen.” HCO PL 7 February 1965 KSW Series 1, Keeping Scientology Working
“A true group must have a management which deals in affinity, reality and communication, and any group is totally within its rights, when a full and reasonable examination discloses management in fault of perverting or cutting ARC, of slaughtering, exiling or suspending that management. ARC is sacred.” Essay on Management
“[People] learn to keep their mouths shut, and it’s the wrong lesson. When in doubt, talk. When in doubt, communicate… you’ll be very successful all the way along the line if you just remember that.” The Phoenix Lectures 1954
“What would happen if all men were free enough to speak? Then and only then would you have freedom.” HCO PL 8 February 1960 Honest People Have Rights, Too (OEC Vol. 0, p. 461)
“There is no slightest advantage in getting somebody to believe some fundamental truth uninspected. …and when he can inspect without fear, he can know the truth of things. And the odd part of it is that once you know the truth of something, it can’t bite…”, excerpt from London Congress, TRUTH AND FREEDOM 23 June 1960
“Any management which operates as a censorship or a propaganda medium will inevitably destroy itself and injure the group.” HCOPL 9 Jan 51 An Essay On Management (OEC Vol. 7 p. 567)
Okay, so I’m speaking freely and speaking out. If my observations and comments are just lies, and I’m only attempting to rabble rouse, then how can reading this harm you or anyone?
“There is an ironbound rule in handling things: WHERE YOU FIND OUTPOINTS, YOU WILL THERE ALSO FIND A SITUATION.” SITUATION FINDING, Data Series 30
Below are just a few of the outpoints and situations that I have been attempting to understand or to think with. The outpoints and situations I’m listing here have become increasingly impossible to ignore. This is of course my data and observations; you will need to think for yourself and decide for yourself based on your own observations and your own data. “Look, don’t listen.”
New definition of Floating Needle at Flag. About 2 years ago, I was given an interesting indoctrination by a Word Clearer in the OT VI course room at Flag. The Word Clearer insisted on me agreeing that the definition of “rhythmic” as in “…rhythmic sweep of the dial…” was that the needle had to swing three times before it could be called an FN.
Here is LRH’s definition: “A floating needle is a rhythmic sweep of the dial at a slow, even pace of the needle. That’s what an F/N is. No other definition is correct.” HCOB 21 July 1978 What Is A Floating Needle? (Tech Vol. II, p. 204) this definition of FN is also in the Tech Dictionary.
I also noticed over the past few years at Flag, in the AO HGCs, that at the after session examiner, the examiner would consistently sit there after I picked up the cans and stare at the meter, wait and wait. This was very odd (outpoint) as in each case I obviously had FNed at the end of session and here I was having trouble FNing at the examiner.
After this happened a couple of times, I learned to sit there and review in my head or in some cases verbalize my wins and cogs in session, and even in some cases, when that didn’t work, begin thinking about just some win in life to get the meter to FN. This experience was very odd (outpoint), as in all my 30 + yrs. of auditing, I’ve never experienced having trouble at the examiner. I just sort of thought, oh well, I guess it’s just me.
Now, looking back on this over the past few months, I have also realized that maybe I wasn’t the only one experiencing this as I’ve noticed consistently long lines at the examiner. I had the same experience at the Success Examiner, trouble FNing. The last time at Success I was red-tagged, sent to Qual and told by the Qual Sec after she watched the video, that I in fact did FN and then I proceeded to attest. Recently, I was able to confirm with other Flag Public that they have had the same experience and observations.
LRH: “One often wonders why people are so ‘reasonable’ about intolerable and illogical situations. The answer is very simple: they cannot recognize outpoints when they see them and so try to make everything seem logical. The ability to actually see an outpoint for what it is, in itself is an ability to attain some peace of mind. …The human reaction is to react to an outpoint. And then get ‘reasonable’ and adopt some explanation for it, usually untrue.
You can safely say that ‘being reasonable’ is a symptom of being unable to recognize outpoints for what they are and use them to discover actual situations.” HCO P/L 30 September 1973 Issue II Data Series 30, Situation Finding (Management Series Vol. 1, p. 128)
“A lot of people are on a stuck flow of being sensible and sane — and that winds up in stupidity. So they get reasonable. Their confront of evil isn’t up to it — basically, their confront of outpoints.” HCO P/L 18 March 1977RA Data Series 43RA, Evaluation and Programs (Management Series Vol. 1, p. 167)
“It is horrifying to behold how easily people buy dub-in. This is because an illogical sequence is uncomfortable. To relieve the discomfort they distort their own observation by not-ising the outpoint and concluding something else.” HCO P/L 18 May 1970 Data Series 7, Familiarity (Management Series Vol. 1, p. 29)
Back to this new definition of FN. Was there a Hidden Data Line?
“The first goof relating to Releases is the one done for fifteen years — running past a free, floating needle on any type of process. THIS is the goof that held back all Scientology. And if it continues to be done, known as well as it is now that you mustn’t, one can only consider it suppressive — not just ignorant — as who now doesn’t know you wreck a Release by running past the floating needle?” HCOB 2 August 1965 Release Goofs (Tech Vol. VII, p. 631)
“But how would one, who has not studied policy or is not very far advanced in his tech training know when he was being given an off-policy or out-tech order?
1. If it seems kind of stupid it is probably off-policy or out-tech…
2. Require that one be shown in the exact issue or book what the policy or tech actually is.
3. Read it for yourself and don’t listen to any interpretation that seems far-fetched.” HCO P/L 13 January 1979 Orders, Illegal and Cross (OEC Vol. 0, p. 145)
“Some students have believed there was a “hidden data line” of tech in Scientology, a line on which Scientology tech was given out by me but not made known to students.
… There is no such line. The whole of technology is released in HCO Bulletins and HCO Policy Letters and tapes I do and release. I don’t tell people anything in some private way, not even Instructors. ‘…If it isn’t written, it isn’t true…’ Somebody says ‘Ron said to — ‘ and on a veteran staff you hear the rejoinder ‘Let’s see it…’ So we have learned the hard way — ‘If it isn’t written, it wasn’t said’. HCO P/L 16 April 1965, Issue I KSW Series 22, The “Hidden Data Line” (OEC Vol. 4, p. 347)
“A ‘hidden data line’ is a pretense that certain data exists outside of HCOBs, books, and tapes.” HCOB 1 September 1971, Issue I C/S Series 57, A C/S as a Training Officer—A Program for Flubless Auditing (Subject Vol. 1, p. 214)
IS THIS NEW DEFINITION OF FLOATING NEEDLE BEING IMPLEMENTED BY RTC AT FLAG? – read on or go to the attachment here and read 31 Factors for Scientologists to Consider.
I discovered that “Since this redefinition of F/Ns was first incorporated into the Pro Metering and Solo courses, students have been referred to sources as far-fetched as the Art Series, the Marketing Series, a physics text, and The Encyclopedia of Music, in order to understand it.” www.friendsoflrh.org Friends of LRH web-site.
Incorporated into SOLO COURSES?
“Psychotics deal with doing people in. Their whole mission in life is destruction.
They inveigh against lower levels gains and seek to discredit them since these run contrary to their aberrated purpose.
But when it gets to Clears and OT levels, psychos go berserk!”
…OT LEVELS HCO BULLETIN 10 MAY 1982
The above (re-defining FN) is JUST ONE example of gross corruption of the Tech, Policy and KSW.
“ANY PERSON FOUND TO BE USING VERBAL TECH SHALL BE SUBJECT TO A COURT OF ETHICS. THE CHARGES ARE GIVING OUT DATA WHICH IS CONTRARY TO HCO BULLETINS OR POLICY LETTERS, OR OBSTRUCTING THEIR USE OF APPLICATION, CORRUPTING THEIR INTENT, ALTERING THEIR CONTENT IN ANY WAY, INTERPRETING THEM VERBALLY OR OTHERWISE FOR ANOTHER, OR PRETENDING TO QUOTE THEM WITHOUT SHOWING THE ACTUAL ISSUE. ANY ONE OF THESE CATEGORIES CONSTITUTES VERBAL TECH AND IS ACTIONABLE PER THE ABOVE.” HCOB 15 February 1979 KSW Series 24, Verbal Tech: Penalties (Tech Vol. XI, p.447)
“So we can assume that people who are a bit inclined to malign, knock apart and shoot the human race, and have that as their only goal, can get into Scientology and can remove things from the technical line, or pervert or alter things in the technical line, which then makes Scientology unworkable.” “And the higher on a command line the power is drawn from, the wider area the alter-is covers.” Class VIII TAPE 1 “An Introduction To Standard Tech” 24 September 1968
CHURCH MANAGEMENT (RTC):
It has been very perplexing to me why so many high profile senior execs (most on post for decades and are now “blown” or declared), have resorted to talking to the media about alleged injustices and human rights violations occurring at the very highest level of our church.
I couldn’t think with this approach. I considered this an obvious violation of Church policy …reflecting badly not only on The Church, but worst of all, dragging Scientology and LRH’s name through the mud.
This has been very upsetting to me and I’m sure to you too. My consideration has always been, if there are disagreements of church policy and programs or injustices, then, the thing to do is handle it on the correct lines and within the group using Scientology Ethics and our Justice System.
As I began to check into this, I discovered that these terminals did in fact attempt with great persistence and personal sacrifice, to handle these outpoints on the correct lines. And in many cases their efforts extended over many years and even decades.
Church management’s response has been to discredit them by asserting they suddenly “went bad” and so have declared them as SPs. The church has even gone further by proceeding to call them apostates, heretics and squirrels and have orchestrated Black PR campaigns to affect their destruction.
Apparently, each had concluded that there was no justice available and no change/correction forthcoming under current church management. But instead of keeping quiet as ordered, they eventually resorted to going public in the media and courts rather than just letting it go, or going away—silenced.
This situation of course has made it increasingly difficult for me as a front lines disseminator in the WISE Sector over the past 29 years to do my job and contribute to our mission of a cleared planet – it makes it hard, really, near impossible for all of us to forward our purpose. Currently the public’s perception of the Church of Scientology is the worst it’s been in our history! This is from my personal experiences of having done thousands of Handle Steps on Raw Public over these many years, and still do in PT as a front-lines disseminator and Power FSM.
It has become a glaring outpoint of the obvious disappearance over the last several years at international events of our senior church leadership/executives. For example the many senior and veteran Int Execs and WDC members, and CMO Execs including our President, Heber Jentzsch, Ken Hoden, Norman Starkey, Janet Light, Guillaume Lesevre, Ray Mitoff, Mark Yeager, Greg Wilhere, Karen Hollander, Diana Horwich – Hubbard, and even David Miscavige’s brother and father Ronnie Miscavige Jr. and Ron Miscavige Sr. and so many more. Oh yes, Guillaume Lesevre did speak at an event some months back but not as ED INT, and is now absent from the scene once again.
Ever increasingly, veteran SO staff who have served faithfully for decades seem to disappear for years and then curiously re-appear; out, off staff and in many cases declared and now resorting to telling their horrific stories of physical abuse and injustice to the media.
Interestingly (outpoint), the attacks through the media (even the ones we hear about in Europe) in recent years and months are not coming from the real SPs on this planet, the international bankers and their government agencies, the CIA, Interpol, etc and their lapdog controlled media they use to forward their Black PR. NO, the attacks are coming from the Media, but with who’s data? Mostly from ex-church staff, especially SO members and high profile public Scientologists who have had to resort to the media and to the courts for the purpose of seeking justice and correction, but mainly to expose the crimes of top leadership in our church, namely David Miscavige.
Why do all the attacks in the media seem to be coming from within; ex-members and ex-SO staff members? What/who is creating this horrific out-PR situation and poisoning the church’s image? Why is the public perception of Scientology at an all-time low, even though we are supposedly doing more public outreach programs than ever before? Why is the media and the entertainment industry incessantly and increasingly making a mockery of and holding up to public ridicule Scientology celebrities, our Church, Scientology and LRH?
Scientology is now a household word, not because of its good works publicized but is sadly now because of the human rights violations and atrocities being committed and condoned at the very top level of church management.
There comes a time when allegations of Senior Sea Org Management Terminals who were speaking out could no longer be ignored. SO terminals who I respected and admired over the past 35 years, including Mike Rinder, CO OSA, Debbie Cook, CO FSO, Mark “Marty” Rathburn, Inspector General RTC, Vicki Aznaran, ex Pres. & COB, RTC, Marketing Execs: Steven Hall, Jeff Hawkins, veteran FSO registrar, Hy Levy, LRH Trained Class XII, Karen de La Carriere Jentzsch and many more including former FSO CL XIIs and CL VII Auditors & CS’s have come forth and told their experiences of outrageous suppressive behavior from Int Execs including mostly David Miscavige.
There are many more senior execs at the highest level of our church who have “blown” and have been effectively silenced. There are many high profile celebrities including Paul Haggis, film producer/director, Lisa Marie Presley, Larry Anderson (orientation film) Michael Fairman, Dianetics TV Spokesperson, Jason Beghe, actor and many more who are “out” – some silent but many others blowing the whistle.
ARE ALL OF THESE PEOPLE REALLY SPs??
HCOPL 15 March 1977, DS 41, Evaluation: The Situation
A few relevant excerpts from this policy:
a) – “Back of wrong data you will normally find an impure intent.”
b) – “Now any time you find thirty people on staff being removed because they were suppressive, you know they had the wrong Why, because the percentages are wrong. … I can assure you they’ve left the suppressive on the staff and I can also assure you the guy that did it was suppressive.”
c) – “CLOUDING UP A SITUATION – Occasionally you’ll find a scene wherein a person’s or area’s PR is greater to him than production – PR, personal PR, means more than production. And that is a characteristic of a suppressive. He’ll fog the situation up with big PR about how good it is so it can’t be handled.” -LRH
You might ask yourself; Who is causing all this Internal Strife, creating all these enemies, all this hate that the media loves to report on? I know I have asked myself these questions. If any of this concerns you (and it should) go to my attachment and read 31 Factors for Scientologists to Consider.
“There are people who suppress. They are few. They often rise up to being in charge and then all things decay. They are essentially psychopathic personalities. Such want position in order to kill. …They arrived when they arrived, in charge of things, because nobody when they were on their way up said ‘No’. They are monuments to the cowards, the reasonable people who didn’t put period to them while they were still only small bullies and still vulnerable.” HCO P/L 7 December 1969 Ethics, The Design of (OEC Vol. 1, p. 483)
Every OUTPOINT or SITUATION that you or I can observe can be explained, clarified or be backed up by an LRH Reference or LRH References and this can be successfully done without taking said references out of context to apply to these Outpoints or Situations.
PLANETARY DISEMMINATION ORG:
I have been wondering about the big broad Div 6 Dissemination Campaigns that we have all been hearing about at Int Events by COB for years. These would flood the Orgs and Missions with brand new public.
Over a year ago, I was briefed (regged) by Planetary Dissemination Senior Fundraiser, Rudy Kempner. He told me that we were very close to securing a huge $1 Billion PR & Marketing Campaign, that as a complete package it was only going to cost the Church $100 Million. He just needed me to donate $5K. This all sounded great to me! Wow! This would be a dream come true and I shared my excitement by briefing many of you about this.
Of course this has never happened. Sure, I’ve seen a few of the PR ads, and PSAs, (mostly at Int Events). The problem is, even if there was big volumes of these in the media, they don’t align with what LRH says about marketing “Books make Booms…” (DMSMH), and he was not talking about all the Basic Books in raw publics hands, or in libraries. We hear about the millions of website hits, and all the “public reaches”, but why are the Orgs and Missions not flooded with New Raw Public? Don’t believe me, go to your local orgs and missions and look, and not just at existing Div 2 public on Basics. Where are the floods of New Public? Who’s stopping the Big Broad Raw Public Dissemination Campaigns that we so desperately need to boom all the New Ideal Orgs?
And besides all this, LRH clearly states, “Word of mouth is a superior form of advertising to newspapers, radio and TV ads. People tend to believe their friends.” HCO/PL PR SERIES 41
Is this (good and positive word of mouth) really possible in this current environment?
I have heard some say: “The public is out-ethics” or “PTS”, “The society has degraded and that’s why we don’t see floods of raw public…” as an explanation for why there are so few new public on lines.
LRH- “There are no dog pcs or bad students.” HCOB 25 June 1972 Recovering Students and Pcs (Tech Vol. X, p. 185)
“THE PUBLIC HATES LIKE HELL TO BE DENIED DIANETICS AND SCIENTOLOGY.” HCO P/L 25 September 1972 Recovering Students and Pcs (OEC Vol. 4, p. 269)
“It has been found that the whole reason for any lack of prosperity of an org is INTERNAL. The surrounding area of the public has very little to do with whether stats are up or down.” HCO P/L 7 March 1972R Esto Series 1R, The Establishment Officer (Management Series Vol.2, p. 3)
“The public stays away from orgs in droves which alter technology.” HCO Executive Letter of 1 September 1964 Technical Lectures by Other Personnel (OEC Vol. 7, p. 1191)
“Bad tech makes it almost impossible to get pcs or students in.” HCO P/L 29 May 1961 Issue I KSW Series 3, Quality and Admin in Central Orgs (OEC Vol. 0, p. 18)
“But the truth is that the public is with you just so long as results are achieved. As soon as they aren’t achieved, areas become upset.” HCO P/L 26 October 1971 KSW Series 6, Tech Downgrades (OEC Vol. 5, p. 97)
“I’ve learned this over the years: The entirety of our stats are internally caused. WE CAN CAUSE STATS AT WILL. External actions don’t affect them. A newspaper can write reams of entheta and it doesn’t affect our stats at all.” HCO P/L 18 March 1977RA Data Series 43RA, Evaluation and Programs (Management Series Vol. 1, p. 167)
“The public is always there. Any enemy action does not change our stats. They are changed inside the org or by higher orders only.” LRH ED 104 INT Auditing Sales and Delivery Prg #1 2 June 1970 (OEC Vol. 5, p. 258)
“It has been proven continually that orgs which function on policy deliver and prosper. Periods of decline have been preceded by gross omissions, unwarranted changes or destructive actions which obstruct or distract from delivery.” HCO P/L 29 December 1971RB, Flag Representative, Purpose of (OEC Vol 7, p. 1407)
“What destroys an organization is its own germs.” Tape: Org Board and Livingness 6 April 1965
Here are some other concerns I have: The never ending delayed Release of Super Power, The Ideal Orgs Program, All Orgs St. Hill size for the release of OT IX & X. IAS Fund Raising. What is the difference between “Command Intention” and LRH’s Intention? If any of this concerns you (and it should) read my attachment The 31 Factors for Scientologists to Consider
“If the tech/admin ratio of 2 admin to 1 tech is kept and even brought up toward 1-1, and if promotion is excellent and effective and tech service and org service is good, it is easy to lay aside enough to earn new quarters. So the image can be improved.” LRH
“If correctly reported outnesses that threaten the org are NOT corrected, then one assumes that suppression exists.” HCOPL 7 DEC 69ETHICS, THE DESIGN OF
“We can stand in the sun only so long as we do not let the deeds of others bring the darkness.” HCOPL 8 FEB 1960
“So the ogre which might eat us up is not the government or the High Priests. It’s our possible failure to retain and practice our technology.” HCO P/L 7 February 1965 KSW Series 1, Keeping Scientology Working (OEC Vol. 0, p. 7)
“All right. As far as the state of the organization is concerned, this organization of Scientologists will be as successful as it communicates, one with another – and not necessarily into a central office – but as successful as it communicates, one with another about its problems and antipathies and demonstrates these into a reality and says what’s going on and discusses it and keeps together, you might say, as an understanding. …
“So there is no barrier in Scientology to good communication. There are no fixed convictions across the boards, one way or the other. The only thing you’re invited to do is just, please, understand what is going on. Don’t make a wild guess at it and a fixed conviction and jump down somebody’s throat.
“I have, time after time, restrained the organization and parts of the organization from trying to unmock Scientologists and, just yesterday, restored the certificates of a fellow who’s evidently been quite wronged by another organizational member in Australia. Why? They’ve both got good intentions, I sent them cables and told them to talk. It’ll all work out.
“There is no organizational trouble we can’t solve. But there is a world situation that will remain unsolved right down to the last whimper unless we stay together, work together and do something about it.” LRH – 4th London ACC, The Role of a Scientologist, 27 October 1955
http://www.friendsoflrh.org/ this web-site has been created by some of the most highly trained Auditors, C/Ses and Execs on the planet.
I lay full responsibility for this gross corruption of out-tech and illegal policy development and implementation directly at the door step of RTC but moreover and specifically with COB David Miscavige.
“It is more than policy that one gets the condition he fails to correctly and promptly assign and enforce.
It’s a sort of natural law. If you let your executives goof off and stay in, let us say, a Danger condition, yet you don’t assign and enforce one, they will surely put YOU in a Danger condition whether it gets assigned or not.
Remember that when your finger falters “on the trigger.”
(HCOPL 30 Oct 67-I, CONDITIONS, HOW TO ASSIGN, OEC Vol 1, p. 566ff)
Of course, predictably, for speaking out like this, there will now be a full blown concerted effort by the church (OSA) to orchestrate a smear campaign against me and trump up all manner of false charges of “suppression” on my behalf and proceed to Declare, and Expel Me – all in an effort to silence me and disconnect me.
That’s okay. I will not be stopped from doing my Bridge or from supporting and defending LRH and his legacy – and will not be stopped from forwarding my purpose of helping people with Scientology. And one day, my sincere hope is – that sooner rather than later, we will all get our Church of Scientology back and then we can restore LRH’s legacy, and his aims and goals together.
Dear friends, please ask yourself this question: Is it really possible to go full OT and reach true spiritual freedom in this environment, when day by day the Tech and Policy that LRH worked so hard for, and devoted his life’s work to, is being chipped away, little by little, altered, perverted and even reversed (see Black Dianetics) in very subtle ways and on a very subtle gradient? This trend is not reverting but only accelerating over the years. Let’s end this madness!
After much consideration, deliberation and evaluation over the past few weeks and realizing that I can no longer support Church Management or those who support it, I have decided to withdraw my support for current Church Management and am hereby announcing my resignation and disconnection from The current Church of Scientology led by David Miscavige and all those who support him.
My Goal Finder is LRH.
Today I join the world wide group called, ‘Independent Scientologists’ where honest, on source, LRH technology is being delivered by some of the highest trained, On Source Auditors and CS’s (CLVIIs, CL XIIs) per KSW. And where exposing the out tech and criminal activities of the current Church of Scientology Management is the order of the day.
AM I PTS? NOT ANY LONGER!
Best wishes.
Steve Poore
PS: To Compare “Command Intention” policy and programs to LRH’s Policy and Programs go to Friends of LRH web-site:
Posted in acknowledgments, black dianetics, David Miscavige, golden age of tech, l. ron hubbard, miscavige crimes, Orgs, ot ambassadors, policy, Scientology, squirreling, tech alterations, the future, the Reformation, training, Uncategorized
Tagged "mark rathbun", David Miscavige, Independent Scientologists, marty rathbun, Scientology Inc, Steven Poore
A most significant advance in the cause of disintegrating DISCONNECTION (Scientology Inc. brand shunning) was announced here late last week. For those who missed it during the flurry of breaking news, you can see it here, Fairmans’ Disarm Scientology Disconnection.
In the wake of that long bomb, Renata and Claudio Lugli advanced the ball further on a Italian national TV program. (English subtitles included) They also helped in our ongoing efforts to differentiate corporate Scientology from the subject of Scientology itself and the independent movement.
Karmic vortex*. Meet spiritual juggernaut.
*term coined by J. Swift, Karmic Vortex. He posted this on 30 March 2008. Though he had no way to know it through PMR (physical matter reality) channels, at the time he wrote that Mat Pesch and Amy were just connecting up with Mosey and me – the first Scientology-related connection I had made since leaving corporate Scientology, which led to everything else.
Posted in black dianetics, celebrities, David Miscavige, Debbie Cook, disconnection, FLAG, harassment, healing, independents, italy, John Travolta, miscavige crimes, office of special affairs, ot 8, ot ambassadors, PI reports, policy, regging, the Reformation, the world, Tom Cruise, Uncategorized
Tagged "mark rathbun", Claudio Lugli, Corporate Scientology, Joy Graysen, marty rathbun, Michael Fairman, Renata Lugli, scientology, Scientology disconnection policy, Scientology Inc, Sky Fairman
Michael, Sky, and Joy Graysen Fairman have delivered a big, effective legal blow to Miscavige and Scientology Inc on the subject of DISCONNECTION.
Shortly after Michael and Joy declared independence from the church, two Scientologist doctors informed them that they and their daughter Sky were no longer welcome as patients at their medical practices.
Joy and Sky
Michael and Joy diligently attempted to obtain a rational, lawful explanation for the sudden terminations. None was forthcoming from either Dr. Benest or Dr. Thorburn.
Michael and Joy decided to take a strong stand to vindicate their civil rights and assure others were not similarly abused in the future. They retained a seasoned litigator, Bruce C Gridley of Kane, Ballmer & Berkman in Los Angeles.
They sued Charlene Thorburn, Doctor of Chiropractic, her Thorburn Chiropractic and Wellness Center and Dr. Lisa Benest and her professional corporation in Los Angeles Superior Court for:
The suits were not based on any animosity the Fairman’s held against either doctor, who were considered friends, but on the fact that they appeared to be guided by the church’s policy of ‘disconnection’, which the Fairmans’ find abhorrent.
Michael Fairman
On March 14th 2012 the Los Angeles Superior Court entered judgment in favor of Michael and Joy and their daughter Sky against Thorburn.
More recently Dr. Benest settled the Fairmans’ case against her with a stipulated judgment and dismissal.
The Thorburn case – complaint, pleadings, and final judgment – can be obtained from the LA Superior Court under case number BC474478 (2011). Those pleadings and final judgment could be used as precedent by your own counsel should you suffer any of the harms alleged in the Fairmans’ case by the application of DISCONNECTION by members of Scientology Inc.
Michael, Joy and Sky did everyone a great service.
I, for one, am eternally grateful to them for standing up for their rights and the rights of all of us.
Thanks to Michael, Joy and Sky for making things change.
Posted in acknowledgments, black dianetics, David Miscavige, disconnection, ethics, FLAG, harassment, healing, independents, justice, legal threats, los angeles, miscavige crimes, miscavige lawyers, office of special affairs, policy, the future, the Reformation, Uncategorized
Tagged Brue C. Gridley, Charlene Thorburn D.C., Dr. Lisa Benest, Independent Scientologists, Joy Graysen, Michael Fairman, scientology, Scientology Inc, Sky Fairman
The following doubt announcements were sent to me by the, until very recently, Course Supervisor of the church of Scientology Mission of Anchorage, Alaska, and her Class VIII husband. These are important documents, on the order of potential impact as A Letter from Garcia and Class XII Karen De La Carriere’s independence announcement. Please carefully read them and do everything you can to give them the furthest possible dissemination among Scientologists. Their data is fresh, and their research is remarkable. What a couple of magnificent thetans!
Forrest & Susan Crane on Kenai Penisula
Doubt Announcement 9/16/2012 by Susan Crane
I am writing you as a friend and fellow Scientologist who is concerned about the current direction of the Church of Scientology. This write-up reflects some of the discrepancies I have observed between the activities of the Church of Scientology as a separate entity to the technology of L. Ron Hubbard. I am completely dedicated to the works of LRH and the technology of Dianetics and Scientology.
Even though Scientology is being delivered in Anchorage, AK with great benefits to individuals, the group is still connected to suppressive actions of the Church of Scientology, specifically those condoned by David Miscavige. I will no longer support the direction the church has been going under his leadership with off-policy programs. I cannot violate my own personal integrity any longer.
I have been in Scientology since 1987 and have been a staff member for 15 of those 25 years, currently supervising at the Anchorage Mission. I am a Flag Interned Class IV Auditor (pre Golden Age of Tech), OT V and Patron of the IAS. I have held several positions within the church ranging from Public Service Secretary, Cram Off, Class IV Auditor, Course Sup and A/ED. While I have had personal disagreements over the years with the way management was being run, violations of LRH policy and tech, it was usually isolated incidents and I felt it best to keep the show on the road. That said, I have had a nagging “feeling” that something was not right within the church. I have done a lot of listening over the years and not a lot of looking. I’ve been told not to read the internet, listen to news, etc. as there may be entheta. I have always been a “good” Scientologist and never looked.
Recently, there have been some high ranking Sea Org members who have either been declared or have left the church. A couple of years ago I was watching a news show and Mike Rinder, a former spokesman for the Church of Scientology, was being interviewed and had left the church and was Declared. Some of you may recall Mr. Rinder as routinely being one of the presenters at the International Events. I was shocked but didn’t bother to look. Last fall, my husband had told me that Dan Koon had also left the church and been declared. If you did the ProTRs course in the 90’s, he was “Joe Howard” in the film. He worked directly with LRH filming the ProTRs film and now he was a declared SP. This just didn’t add up in my universe. Another SP is Larry Anderson who is the narrator in the Orientation film.
I decided it was time to get my head out of the sand and start to look. After all, I live in the United States and I should be able to communicate with whoever I like and not be suppressed or told not to.
HCOB 11 April 1982 SEC CHECKING IMPLANTS LRH
An implant is an enforced command or series of commands installed in the reactive mind below the awareness level of the individual to cause him to react or behave in a prearranged way without his “knowing it.”
IMPOSED SILENCE. “The simplest and most common implant – and its lightest but not least deadly form—is the command to withhold. Implants could be said to be “methods of preventing knowledge or communication: and this can extend to the point of the person himself denying himself the data. The commonest “imposed silence” is probably the threatened child – an “if you tell, you will be punished.” Or simply ordering him not to tell. This tends to occlude his own memory and can be classified as an implant.”
The church “culture” has become one of not reading entheta or negative press about the church, don’t communicate to others anything negative about the church, don’t read the internet, don’t communicate to your friends if the church is engaging in a program or activity that violates an HCOB or HCO PL. Per policy, one should write-up actions that disagree with tech or policy. However, if one does KR certain activities, my experience has been Sec Checks being order on the individual at his own expense.
On January 1st, 2012, Forrest and I were traveling back to Anchorage from visiting my mother in Georgia. He googled “Scientology New Years Eve event” in search of any releases or announcements from the New Years Eve event. Instead, what came up was an email from Debbie Cook, former Captain of the FSO for 17 years, OEC, FEBC (Flag Executive Briefing Course) and DSEC (Data Series Evaluators Course). She is now declared by the church. At the time of her email, she was not declared and in good standing. I read the email and AGREED with every single point – FROM MY OWN REALITY AND VIEWPOINT. There was only one point I didn’t agree with and it was only because I didn’t have first- hand knowledge of the events. Not only that, I was familiar with the references she quoted. I have heard comments that she violated her Nondisclosure Agreement when she left the church. I have to ask myself this question, why did she even have to sign a nondisclosure agreement to begin with? Was this to protect the church from her disclosing upper level confidential materials? Was this to protect the church from some communication about OT IX or X or some other confidential project in the works? It didn’t quite make sense to me. Because of the above outpoints, I decided to search further as to what was happening in the church.
Outpoint: The church seems to be operating as a money motivated enterprise with an insatiable appetite, more concerned with fundraising and cannibalizing its existing field rather than caring about the individual and getting them up the bridge.
What does LRH say? HCO PL 31 Jan 1983 “The Reason for Orgs” “The only reason orgs exist is TO SELL AND DELIVER MATERIALS AND SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC…THE OBJECT IS TOTALLY FREED BEINGS!” Also LRH ED 131 INT of 8 Dec 1970: Orgs have only 2 major final valuable products. One is well-trained auditors. The other is satisfied pcs.” And, “Tech and Admin policy exist only to assist making these two products IN VOLUME.” For the past 8 months, my husband and I have been following the completions for CC Nashville, Denver Org, ASHO, ASHO UK. This has not been occurring.
At every turn, one is made to ask for donations, i.e. IAS, books, Ideal Orgs, various library campaigns. From my observation, most people have a relatively fixed income. I have seen many individuals and families having to declare bankruptcy due to financial strain from regging. Maxing out credit cards, refinancing homes, increasing credit card limits seems to be the order of the day. There is complete disregard for the individual’s ability to pay back the debt. Additionally, I donate to several other causes outside of the church. I can donate a small amount, say $25.00, and I will receive the most theta acknowledgement. One would have thought I donated 1000’s of dollars. When I offer a donation to the IAS, I get a lame acknowledgment and then pressure for how much more I need to donate, frequently turning into a several hour reg cycle if I don’t give in to the demands.
In September, 2012, we had the first Maiden Voyage event at the mission. We had an IAS reg come up here from CA as well as a staff member from the Seattle Org. After the MV event, the IAS reg gave a very short briefing – 10 minutes tops- about how the church was going to get ethics in on the government and needed us to donate for this campaign. He already had the agreement of a couple to donate $2000.00 for this cause and wanted others to do the same. A couple other people offered donations. He then said he would meet with others independently. He got with me and we scheduled a time to meet the next day. I met with him and without further enlightenment as to the need for the dollars or what the IAS was planning to do with the donation, this was his communication:
How much do I make? How much does my husband make? How much do we have in our savings? What are our investments? Do we have any inheritance? Are we expecting any inheritance? How much do we owe on our credit cards? How much is available on our credit cards? Do we own gold and/or silver? Property? IRA’s? In the middle of this battery of questions, I asked him why he was asking me all of this. (Duh!) His response was to “qualify” me. I then asked him “What about enlightening me on why you need the money”? His response was “We’ll get to that”. Well, we never got to that because I made sure he knew I was not qualified to donate a large amount of money. No further enlightenment came as to the need of the money. Is this LRH? I have personally experienced multiple IAS reg cycles where the goal is 1000’s, even 10’s of thousands of dollars for the IAS. Of course all of this is for the greater good for the greater number of dynamics. After all, the third dynamic is more important than the first dynamic. The fact that I was contributing time as a staff member doesn’t even enter into the equation.
What does LRH say about the dynamics? Per Professional Auditor’s Bulletin #83, * 8 May 1956, “The Conditions of Existence”, Vol. III page 375, LRH states “There is no thought or statement here that any one of these eight dynamics is more important than the others. While they are categories (divisions) of the broad game of life, they are not necessarily equal to each other. It will be found amongst individuals that each person stresses one of the dynamics more than the others, or may stress a combination of dynamics as more important than other combinations”. I have not seen the caring for the individual in a long time. There has been so much pressure brought to bear on the public that they are unable to afford their own bridge anymore.
Concerning “Ideal Orgs”: Since when is a new building and a new church the same thing? That sounds like A=A=A to me. The PR for the church announces all of the new “churches” it has opened recently, i.e. Ideal Orgs. However, they are the same churches only new buildings. The ideal org seems to be based primarily on physical appearance, not actual production. Again, I have not read any policy where LRH says to refinance your house, empty one’s bank account or donate thousands of dollars to fund these new buildings. Is that the answer to expanding Scientology? I have read LRH policy to the contrary.
What does LRH say about fundraising? In HCO PL 24 February 1964, Issue II “Org Programming”, LRH states
“If the org slumps…don’t engage in ‘fund-raising’ or ‘selling postcards’ or borrowing money.
Just make more income with Scientology.
It’s a sign of very poor management to seek extraordinary solutions for finance outside Scientology. It has always failed.
For orgs as for pcs ‘Solve It With Scientology’.
Every time I myself have sought to solve financial or personnel in other ways than Scientology I have lost out. So I can tell you from experience that org solvency lies in More Scientology, not patented combs or fund-raising barbeques.”
We just held the three 2012 Maiden Voyage events at the mission. In one of the events, we saw the fundraising activities of the OT Ambassadors at the different orgs across the planet raising money for their new Ideal Orgs. Does this activity agree with the above quote from LRH?
What does LRH say about buildings? Per HCOPL “The Ideal Org”, “It would be busy looking, with staff in motion, not standing about. It would be clean and attractive enough not to repel its public”.
What else does LRH say about the importance of buildings?
In the LRH lecture “Consideration, mechanics and the theory behind instruction”, July 20, 1954 from the Phoenix Lectures, LRH says “There is no effort on the part of Scientology to own or have the allegiance of billions and billions and billions of people, or to have thousands and thousands of tons of masonry piled up, with Scientology written across the top of it, or to have certain governments of Earth giving their allegiance to Scientology or something of the sort. This is very, very dull indeed. The empire of Scientology is 100 percent the empire of wisdom; there is no other empire envisioned”. How is an individual supposed to afford his own bridge after all of the donations to the IAS and Ideal Orgs? To me, the church is putting actual Scientology out of reach to the average individual. Is that LRH’s intentions?From my observation, the church operates 180 degrees in the opposite direction of LRH’s intentions.
Where should the income of an organization come from per LRH? In HCOB 20 March 1957 Issue I, “Income Sources”, LRH lists the acceptable income sources for an organization. There are 12 acceptable income sources and an additional 10 items that are the most potent promotion factors. Among some of the acceptable sources are:
The list continues but there is no mention of fundraisers or just flat out donations from parishioners.
Outpoint: There has been an exodus from the Church of highly trained Classed auditors as well as veteran Sea Org members. Some of the most stable terminals in the church have either left or been declared. Did you know most of the following individuals are now either declared or have left the church?
Kay Rowe – 37 year veteran and former IAS Registrar
Ronnie Miscavige, Snr – David Miscavige’s father
Dror Center – Scientology Mission of Haifa, Israel has left the church. This mission had the top auditor on the planet for 2 years.
Debbie Cook – former Captain of the FSO for 17 years
Karen de la Carriere/Jentzsch – Flag Service Org (FSO) Class XII auditor and C/S; L’s auditor CS – one of only 7 Class XII CSes ever made
Mike Rinder – former chief spokesman of the Church of Scientology. He served as Executive Director of the Office of Special Affairs
What does LRH say about SPs?
In the LRH lecture “About Rhodesia”, “You should upgrade your idea of what an SP is. Man, meet one sometime! A real one! A real monster…. Well, in all the time we’ve been around here we only had one SP that I know of. One real SP that was on staff…. And I don’t know of another single SP that we’ve ever had on staff. Isn’t that interesting. You see all these SP orders and so on… Don’t throw it around carelessly, because this is an–a very exaggerated condition, SP.”’ –
Also, Tommy Davis, former spokesman for the Church of Scientology told John Roberts on CNN
“There’s no such thing as disconnection… There isn’t any such policy in the Church dictating who you can and cannot be in communication with, it just doesn’t happen.” LRH cancelled disconnection in HCO PL 15 Nov 1968, Cancellation of Disconnection.
My husband was told by the MAA at the FSO he had to disconnect from his sister because she was married to his brother-in-law who refunded. My husband did so. My husband has a very large family and it was communicated to them through this action that “Scientology destroys families”. Fortunately their relationship has been mended. But the damage had already been done to his family.
Outpoint: The new HQS course that was released by the church in roughly 2011 has the Code of a Scientologist from the Creation of Human Ability book. LRH withdrew that code and reissued it in HCO PL 5 Feb. 1969R, Issue 1 Revised 15 May 1973 Code of a Scientologist. “The Code of a Scientologist as per The Creation of Human Ability is withdrawn. It is reissued as follows:
1. To keep Scientologists, the public and the press accurately informed concerning Scientology, the world of mental health and society.” This is vastly different that the COHA code that is in the HQS pack that states: “To hear or speak no word of disparagement to the press, public or preclears concerning any of my fellow Scientologists, our professional organization or those whose names are closely connected with the science”. In light of recent events in the press, one has to ask if the church did this deliberately. Also, with the emphasis of how the Basic books are exactly as LRH wanted, how could such an obvious oversight happen?
Saint Hill Size Orgs: You don’t hear them mentioned any more. All we hear about nowadays are “Ideal Orgs,” and the square footage of each. A Saint Hill Size Org has to meet certain quotas – number of staff, number of students on course, number of auditing hours and so forth. It requires actual work. It requires real, honest expansion. An “Ideal Org” doesn’t require anything but a big, empty building – purchased with your money. The Div. 6 areas have big screen TV’s and fancy displays. One wonders, are there any orgs in the world that are really, actually, the size of Old Saint Hill that can be measured by statistics that measure true production?
Superpower: Ron’s Journal 30 1978-The Year of Lightning Fast New Tech 17 Dec 1978 The Superpower Rundown was originally announced in 1978. It is described as “A super fantastic, but confidential series of rundowns that can be done on anybody whether Dianetic Clear or not that puts the person into fantastic shape unleashing the super power of a thetan”. Here we are, thirty five years later, and it is still not released. It also states “ Super Power will be delivered at Saint Hills within the next 6 weeks as we are right now super grooming the Super Power Auditors in a special international course”. The only mention of Superpower these days is in the context of donations towards a building in Clearwater. Construction began on this building in 1998, and now, 14 years later, the building is still not open and Super Power has not been released. Per Wikipedia, it was originally budgeted to cost $24 million, but the cost has more than doubled to an estimated $50 million after repeated redesign of the interior.
The 1991 Book Re-release: With the release of “The Basics,” we are hearing all about how the books are now “fully verified as completely on-Source.” We are hearing how all errors have been verified meticulously against LRH’s original manuscripts to ensure that the books are exactly as LRH intended them to be. However, those of us who can actually remember the past recall that the exact same things were said in 1991 when all of the books were repackaged and re-released.
Here are the words you are supposed to forget were ever issued, from RTC ED 450, 6 September, 1991, “The Scope of Scientology, Auditors Day 1991,” written by David Miscavige:
“For this reason, in April of 1987 we embarked upon a strategy of making all the material of the Scientology Grade Chart standard and available to all. The plan was to:
“ Review all materials against original LRH manuscripts and handle any omissions or alter-is that had crept in through the years either by mistake or at the hand of some SP.”
He goes on to say,
“In this period, from 1987 to present time, the following has been accomplished…
All Dianetics and Scientology books were reviewed, gotten fully on-source and issued. These books were put into a form that could easily be studied and understood by anyone, with definitions of hard-to-find terms right in the book, thus preventing individuals from going by misunderstood. This has been done with all of the over two dozen books on the subject.”
Then, in 2007, there is the release of “The Basics”. In the Guide to Materials of Dianetics and Scientology, it states, “All of LRH’s books are now available in their complete and pure form, precisely matching LRH’s original manuscripts….In sum, these books are not only beautiful and enduring works of craftsmanship, but – first and foremost – each is a perfect rendition of LRH’s original.
So which is correct, 1987 or 2007? And ten years from now, will we be told to buy all the books again as “now they are completely on-Source”?
What about the “old” books?
After the release of “The Basics”, the ED at the local mission was instructed to tell the parishioners to gather their books and mail them back to the church in Los Angeles. Living in Alaska, it wasn’t feasible to do that. We were then told to “burn the books”. This didn’t feel right but we complied with this “order”. We did not apprise all of our parishioners of this fact, only the most dedicated ones as we thought that someone newer in the church probably wouldn’t “understand”. We had a book burning bon fire at our house in which we burned all of the mission’s books that were now “old” editions of the newly released Basics as well as our own personal books.
This is just a sampling of what I have discovered in my search for answers. I am only asking you to do your own research. Please check out these sites:
www.scientology-cult.com (I never in a million years would thought I would refer someone to a website with this name)
scnpeace.wordpress.com
Here is the “policy” that I applied through my search.
LRH is the Source of Dianetics and Scientology and no one else. It is to be read, word cleared and understood by the individual. Not an interpretation or suggestion from someone else.
1.On Personal Integrity
WHAT IS TRUE FOR YOU is what you have observed yourself.
And when you lose that, you have lost everything.
I am NOT Anti-LRH or Anti-Scientology. From my research, I can no longer support what I feel the organization has become under the leadership of David Miscavige. I have had huge wins in auditing and application of standard Scientology technology. LRH’s purpose was to bring spiritual freedom to man and to make him more able. I feel that the organization has become one of “mind control” and I want no part of it. It HAS become a cult and I feel the church HAS become a suppressive group. The organization has become something else that I do not want any part of. I want my church back!!!
The vast majority of the Sea Org Execs, Mission, Church and the field trust in LRH as Source and has the honest intention of improving conditions in this world through the standard application of ethics, tech and admin. They are good, decent people and I will always be their friends and willing to help direct to source (LRH) materials when desired. Per HCO PL 15 Sept. 1967, “The Supervisor’s Code”, #1. The Supervisor must never neglect an opportunity to direct a student to the actual source of Scientology data. I am willing to help anyone who is seeking answers to direct them to the LRH writings on the subject when able.
I am joining the group of individuals who follow LRH and insist upon “Keeping Scientology Working”. The vast majority of the “Independents” are in accord with the above, therefore I consider them my friends and will be joining their movement.
Susan Crane
My Doubt Formula Announcement by Forrest Crane
I’m joining the side that will KSW. This was not a Doubt Formula on Scientology. This was a Doubt Formula on the Church of Scientology. I will remain loyal to Standard Tech. Standard Tech is so powerful it still works even when fantastically alter-ised but when unalter-ised it’s priceless.
Back in 1989 I did lower conditions and I decided that my friends were those who would Keep Scientology Working. I still have that write up. At that time, I was only getting a small inkling of some that wouldn’t KSW. Since then I have observed just how insane a group will go in accepting unworkable “technology.” “By actual record the percentages are about twenty to 100,000 that a group of human beings will dream up bad technology to destroy good technology.” LRH. Back then I never thought that I couldn’t just give another Scientologist the red on white, the LRH, and not have it complied with and I never dreamt that I couldn’t write up an Alter-is Report to RTC, Snr C/S Int Off, Keeper of the Tech, etc. and not have the red on white complied with. I have been thoroughly disabused of that idea, it is shocking. Everything I have witnessed is right there in KSW #1.
HCO PL 31 MAY 1968 SCIENTOLOGY TECHNOLOGY
“There is one Tech and that is Standard Tech. Unfortunately there is other tech around. This other tech is a liability. Other tech is defined as any tech which is not Standard Tech.”
One hardly hears of Standard Tech anymore. We now have Golden Age of Tech, GAT, soon to be GAT II. Doing the GAT drills, I encountered many violations in Standard Tech and wrote up my KRs to RTRC per the instructions and also turned them in to Ethics as Technical Alter-is Reports per policy. Some of this alteration of the tech was quite serious, not minor tech points. This I did push to get hammered out of existence which only led me into being an ethics particle.
Over my history, I have written many Technical Alter-is Report on the subject of missed withholds. The subject of missed withholds is just about the most important subject there is in Scientology. Well, pcs have vanished, Missions have vanished. Overts, out-int, M-Us and PTS can all cause blows (and per HCOB BLOW-OFFS, things can be so bad one has no choice but to blow) but ONLY the MWH can make one vanish.
I’ve written this up many times only to be sent to ethics, dead filed, kicked out and it has cost me I don’t know how many 10s of thousands of dollars. I’m done M-9ing HCOB Auditing By List. I’ve lost track how many times I’ve had to M-9 it, M-2 it, M-4s, clay demos, 13 intensives of Sec Checks, you name it, Comm Ev (my request), Court of Ethics, B of I’s. And “Do NOT change the question” still reads the same to me as it did the very first time I read it.
So, if one gets himself ‘Dead Filed’, how do you handle that? Well, look it up, one has to get himself to the state of Clear. What do you do if you’re already Clear? Well, then it’s anyone’s arbitrary. I had to get Sec Checked for 13 intensives, there went my OT V. I was even given the “Truth R/D” and never in my life have I ever falsely vilified a well intentioned person. In my letter I asked, ‘are you or are you not going to hammer out of existence the incorrect technology?’ When I found out I was Dead Filed, my meter was at Gold for certification. They would not return it to me, my property. The ED at the Mission informed me she was told that I sounded like a ‘Freezoner’. I had never heard of it before! What is that? And my last communication to the MAA at AOLA was, ‘I’m in need of some answers’, which resulted in my search for answers, taking off the blinders and willing to communicate with anyone or anything and boy, did I get answers!
I believe it was in 2003, I went to do the new PRoTRs course at Flag. I wrote a KR to an RTC Rep on the violations of HCOB Auditing By Lists. I was taken off my TRs course and sent to cramming and again had to M-9 Auditing By Lists. From there I was sent to Ethics to be informed that I had to disconnect from my sister as she was A-J and I had to leave Flag. The policy that covers this is HCO PL 27 Oct 64R, which says you cut communication with an A to J till they have a change of heart. This is good Church policy, but to apply it to a brother and a sister is destructive. I left and drove to my mother’s house in Denver for a visit. My sister calls my mother every night, so when she called, my mother told my sister that I was there. Of course she wants to talk with me. I take the phone and tell my sister I’m unable to talk with her because of her relation to the Church. This hurt my sister and my mother. It was over a year before I realized no one or any organization had the right to tell me who I could or couldn’t communicate with. Ref: HCOB 2 May 85, Responsibility, Definition Of.
But the crime had already been committed. So I wrote an apology letter to my sister begging her for forgiveness. I also stated that that was not Scientology, but was Church Executives who didn’t understand Scientology. But the damage had already been done, it has gone through my family, and both my brother and sister have large families, that Scientology destroys families.
This idea of Scientology destroys families is widespread throughout our society due to the many forced disconnections, which has been cancelled since 1968, Reform Code, Admin Dict. HCO POLICY LETTER OF 15 NOVEMBER 1968 CANCELLATION OF DISCONNECTION
The PR on the Church is the worst in history. You won’t know that unless you look.
The Classification Chart And Auditing, 26 Jul 66, BC Lecture #434
Pg. 245 “What is standard technology? Standard technology is contained in HCOBs. It actually isn’t contained in any of the books of Dianetics and Scientology. Did you ever realize that? Modern technology is not contained in any of the hardcover books, or any of the other books. It’s contained in HCOBs, Hubbard Communications Office Bulletins, and they just run off one after the other. And one of these fine days I suppose we will roll up our sleeves and publish them all in consecutive order, all corrected so that nothing ever corrects anything in the bulletins and make it very, very easy. But we will have to put them probably in about seven or eight or ten different volumes, because there are quite a few of them. But that’s standard technology. They’re on white paper printed with red ink. If I haven’t signed it, it isn’t true. And that’s standard technology.
Now, because we developed something later, we didn’t lose the standard technology of something earlier. The main bugbear of the person studying Scientology was that he – the bugbear was his, not mine – was that he conceived, every time he read something new, that that wiped out all the old. And this concept was brought about on just this one point” that he didn’t understand the old that he had read, so he didn’t realize that it integrated with the new which had just been issued. And at no time, really, in HCOBs, has the new wiped out the old. There are very, very few corrections.”
I consider EM Drill 19-1, the only non LRH EM Drill to be squirrel! See my Technical Alter-is Report.
Many more tech and policy violations can be found at:http://www.friendsoflrh.org . Also one needs to look at http://savescientology.com & http://spargostory.wordpress.com
RON’S JOURNAL 30, 1978 – THE YEAR OF LIGHTNING FAST NEW TECH
In this, LRH states Super Power will be released within the next 6 weeks at St. Hills. In it he lays out the upper bridge stating: “NED for OTs can be given any time after OT III and before OT VIII and is a prerequisite for OT VIII.” But there’s all the original OT levels. The original OT levels aren’t delivered anymore. Can one make it to Clear without his Grades? Can one make it to OT without his Pre-OT levels? Some do, few can.
HCOB 23 DEC 82 C/S SERIES 73RB THE NO-INTERFERENCE AREA CLARIFIED AND RE-ENFORCED. Have you seen the ‘Greg & Debra Barnes’ video on YouTube? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n-Sh3hLn6PM. Oh my.
CL XIIs, CL VIIIs, Top Exec’s, Whistleblowers, and other Scientologists have been getting Declared. The Church has been doing everything in their power to discredit them for whistle-blowing as they will do with me. They can take every crime and overt that I have ever committed, confessed to in or out of session, as they do anyway, and publish them in the Anchorage Daily News for all to see. I couldn’t care less. I’d even get a good laugh out of some of them. Anyone thinking less of me has far worse things that they are hiding.
A 1967 filmed interview with LRH: “A suppressive person isn’t critical, a suppressive person is a person who denies the rights of others.”
Even though LRH cancelled ‘disconnection’ back in 1968, the Church has re-instituted the practice of enforced disconnection, no longer a personal decision. I’ve seen destroyed families, destroyed marriages, destroyed businesses, destroyed friendships. I’ve had my right to communicate, my right to property, my right to practice denied by the Church. And Debbie Cook was driven into the Hole (which is a double wide trailer at Int Base). It is now part of Court Records in San Antonio, under oath with penalty of perjury that Debbie Cook was Kidnapped, Beaten, Tortured and Degraded. Other Scientologists were present as witnesses of the abuses. And of course, the Church says they are all bitter defrocked apostates corroborating their lying. The Church dropped their charges and would not let the Court continue. No libel and slander suit was filed. And where are the other Int Executives? One individual suggested they’re off doing OT IX & X. Other witnesses say otherwise.
Here’s notice to me from a friend:
Subject: Joining Denver Org staff
Hello Forrest,
As the subject line suggests, I am joining Org staff. As you might guess, I have to drop my connection with you because of some declare.
I wish you all the best, health and happiness, and success in the mining business.
Above all, have fun,
Name
My wife checked on my SP Declare with Denver’s Dir I&R and the DSA who had no record of my Declare. So I emailed my friend to get a copy of my Declare and he said he was never shown the SP Declare. He stated the SO Recruiters were in Denver manning up the Denver Org. They verbally told him 2 CL VIIIs he was connected to were Declared and I was one of them. I have not seen my Declare order nor have I been Comm Ev’d. And as it turned out, he never joined staff in Denver. What he was doing at the time was the greater good.
SUPPRESSIVES AND GAE, 2 Aug 66 BC Lecture #436, Pg 23: “He has other characteristics which are quite marked, and it’s really an interesting bread of cat. If you ever got him auditing, he will only be happy or satisfied if his preclear gets worse. And he’s only sad when the pc gets better. And that characteristic was what spotted us suppressives, year and years and years ago.”
My wife and I have been following the stats of Classed Auditors made and Releases and Clears made in various Orgs and to our surprise, none to few are being produced. In 2010, my wife and I even walked into the Atlanta Org and Nashville Ideal Org and found both to be empty of public. My last Ethics handling was at AOLA in 2009. I was sent to do a clay demo in the practical course room. On one occasion, I was the only one there. On another occasion which was a Saturday, there was only one other student from San Francisco. I asked him why he wasn’t doing his Solo I at his Org. He replied he gets better service at AO. He had the Sup to himself and he was also his coach. Well trained Auditors and satisfied pcs are the product of orgs and they’re just not being made or just too few being made. If you reward a down stat you get a down stat.
My wife & I are Patrons of the IAS, even though this practice is forbidden by LRH, (LRH built St. Hill by exchanging a valuable service with the public), we’ve put in well over $45,000 to the IAS and are paying on that debt. I look back and wonder, ‘wouldn’t it had been better if we had given that money to the Church and gotten Susan onto her OT VI & VII, she could have been through OT VIII by now. I think all these programs the IAS is sponsoring are good programs and it’s the duty of Int management to fund these programs. And there would be more than enough to fund these programs provided the Church delivered Standard Tech and was On-Source, In-Ethics, In-Tech and On-Policy. We take responsibility for it as we walked into it but I wondered, how did they do it? The IAS has a few techniques, here’s one of them:
Psychosomatic: It’s Meaning in Scientology 30 Jul 64 BC Lecture #395
Pg. 68 Now, if you hit somebody with enough bad news – this is your important technical datum – if you hit somebody with enough bad news, force or duress, you can make them give you something. That happens to be a mental mechanism. Nobody ever really looks at this as a mental mechanism, but it is a mental mechanism. That’s all it is. If you hit somebody hard enough – and that would mean a blow or bad news, or you know, a blow in the field of mass and bad news in the field of significance – if you hit somebody hard enough, you can make him give you something. Blackmail is based on this. Government is based on this. Taxation is based on this.
Now, so these things can be manipulated from the other side, too. But this is a mental law – this is a mental law you should pay some attention to, because it’s the basic law which is used usually in government, extortion, blackmail, medicine, any of these things.
My wife & I will continue our spiritual journey using Scientology. I will continue to audit and I do have some VVIPs on my lineup as well as some very good friends.
Psychosomatic: It’s Meaning in Scientology, 30 Jul 64, BC Lecture #395, Pg. 66 “Now, the right to practice is based upon the ability to do. And if you ever permit that to be dropped out of Scientology, you will have a great deal of trouble from thereon. The ability to do regulates the right to practice. That’s open and shut.”
Iknow of many more Gross Auditing Errors, however the above is enough to get my point across.
Best to all,
Forrest Crane
CL VIII C/S, FPRD Aud, Purif I/C & C/S, SS II, Patron
PS: To the Golden Age of Knowledge:
A Summary of Study 4 Aug 64 BC Lecture #396
Pg. 88. “Now, you can err to the degree that you’re giving him a subject which he’s never going to do. Now, let’s take it over into Scientology. You’re giving him all the data necessary to run Standard Operating Procedure of July, Elizabeth, New Jersey and so forth. And the mistake is to give him all of it. He’s never going to use it.
All you want to know, all you want to give him is enough so he can identify it. If he collides with this thing again, he said, “Hey, that’s Standard Operating Procedure”, you know, “back there, Elizabeth”. “Early days, Elizabeth”, is about all you want to get through there. Have some dim idea where this thing fits, you see. He’s not going to do it. So therefore, if he’s not going to do it, you’ve got to strip the significance off of it. You got the idea? That’s the way these are kept in balance. If the guy isn’t going to do it, take the significance off of it. See, you’ve got to keep these things in balance. If he’s going to do it, pour it to him, man!”
My personal advice, KNOW THE TECH, skip the basics and get onto your academy levels. You’ll have plenty of time to read books if you haven’t already.
Posted in alaska, black dianetics, cover up, disconnection, ethics, events, FLAG, golden age of tech, healing, ias, independents, miscavige crimes, Orgs, policy, propaganda, regging, squirreling, Super Ponzi, tech, tech alterations, the future, the Reformation, training, Uncategorized
Tagged "mark rathbun", alaska, church of Scientology Anchorage Alaska, Forrest Crane, Independent Scientologists, marty rathbun, Scientology Inc, Susan Crane
Moving On Up a Little Higher 