Let’s say:
You find out your husband has inoperable cancer and must go through months of chemotherapy and radiation.
Let’s say:
Your husband takes full responsibility for his physical condition and directs his own course of medical treatment with the spiritual aspect being assisted by an assigned auditor and CS.
Let’s say:
After months of medical and spiritual treatment, you find out in the public venue that your husband “isn’t expected to live.”
Let’s say:
You again find out in the public venue that your husband did it wrong in his handling of the financial exchange for helping LRH.
Let’s say:
You are told about documents that exist regarding the financial exchange for taking care of LRH – not by your husband – but in the public venue and verified by an executive at ASI.
Let’s say:
You know the data is false because you were present at the meeting when the exchange was set up.
Let’s say:
At no time were you ever consulted regarding the correct data which thus prolonged the false data and resulted in trouble for twenty plus years.
Let’s say:
When your husband eventually departs – in a fully cognizant condition – you are shunned by former friends and are escorted out of the organization where you have worked for the last four years.
Let’s say:
You are then contacted by the IAS Reg who thinks you should take out a home equity loan to raise your status in the IAS because COB has “a really big situation.”
Let’s say:
You “see where this is going” and decide that there’s a great deal of counter- and other-intention in your current environment, some lasting as long as twenty plus years.
Let’s say:
You decide to take matters into your own hands and relocate to a far friendlier environment.
Let’s say:
You put others in charge of the hats your husband no longer wears as well as the hats you have not been allowed to wear and new hats you refuse to wear.
Let’s say:
Even after relocating you are called, dropped in upon, sent books off account and regged by telephone; in other words, caused trouble by those who think you should be doing anything other than what you already are doing.
Let’s say:
You discover a new venue which is far more compassionate and caring than that which you have left behind, and into which you now can communicate.
Let’s say: Hallelujah!
My name is Rachel Denk. Dr. Denk introduced me to Scientology in the early seventies and we were married in the Seattle Org.
Dr. Denk departed this life on November 5, 2004. In later 2005, I relocated to Spokane WA, the city where I was raised and still have family. Dr. Denk was born and raised in Omak WA and still has family living there.
In closing, I deeply miss my husband of thirty years and the life we shared. But I lost far too much at one time at the hands of organized Scientology and, stated very simply, had to operate independently out of respect for both Dr. Denk and LRH. This is my statement.